Papers of John Adams, volume 10

To Jean Luzac, 30 November 1780 JA Luzac, Jean

1780-11-30

To Jean Luzac, 30 November 1780 Adams, John Luzac, Jean
To Jean Luzac
Sir Amsterdam Nov. 30. 1780

Your kind Favour of the 24 with the two elegant Copies of the Pensees I have received, with Gratitude.

The Republick appears to be, at this Time, in a violent Crisis. It is to be hoped, that the effect of the Fermentation will be Salutary. If it is indeed true, that the Republick has acceeded to the armed Neutrality, and the Nations engaged in that Confederation, are in earnest to make a common Cause, the commercial Interest of this 387Country, will be protected: because England will not venture to take Ships which will be redemanded by Such a formidable Combination. Reprisals ordered by four Nations or perhaps five or Six in addition to three with whom they are already at War would be too dangerous for England, or if she should be desperate enough to hazard it, the confederated Powers would easily obtain Compensation, for it may, I think be depended upon that England is not omnipotent nor infallible. England owes the Existence of her maritime Power at this moment to the Inactivity, whether accidental or political of her present Enemies. This Inactivity may not always continue. Perhaps it has been Studied on Purpose to accomplish the armed Neutrality. I can easily conceive that the Councils of France and Spain might think it, prudent to give Time to the neutral nations, to accomplish their Confederation.

If delays were necessary to compleat, the neutral System, I should rejoice in those delays, because I esteem that, an excellent Effect for the good of Mankind Springing out of the American Revolution.

The English are degenerating in the Conduct of the American War into greater and greater Degrees of Cruelty and Barbarism. But there is a kind of Consolation in Seeing that they pursue the Same Maxims towards other nations, which they pursued, first towards Us. When all Nations shall see that they have become Tyrants towards them, they will at length believe that they have been Tyrants in America.1

The Honourable Francis Dana Esq., formerly a Member of Congress, now a Secretary to one of their Legations, will do me the favour to deliver this. He has an Inclination to see Leyden, and I should esteem myself, under particular obligations to you, Sir, if you could give him an opportunity of Seeing in your City, whatever is worthy the Attention of a Traveller. I am, Sir with much Esteem your obliged sert.

LbC (Adams Papers).

1.

This paragraph was written after the closing and marked for insertion at this point.

From Benjamin Franklin, 30 November 1780 Franklin, Benjamin JA

1780-11-30

From Benjamin Franklin, 30 November 1780 Franklin, Benjamin Adams, John
From Benjamin Franklin
Sir Passy Nov. 30. 1780

I have had a severe Fit of the Gout which has confined me six Weeks; but it is now going off, and I flatter myself that it has done me a great deal of Good.

388

I have just received a Letter from Dr. Ezra Stiles, of which the inclosed is an extract. Please to communicate it to Mr. Searle, and then give it to M. Dumas if you judge it proper for Publication.1 I have also a large and particular Account of Arnolds Treachery. There is not time to transcribe it for this Post, but you shall have it per next. I have the honour to be with great Esteem Sir Your Excellency's most obedt & most humble Servant

B Franklin

Enclosed is a Letter for you which came by the same Ship.2

RC (Adams Papers).

1.

The enclosed extract has not been found, but it was from Stiles' letter to Franklin, dated 10 Oct. at Newport. An extract from this letter, containing Stiles' commentary on Benedict Arnold and his treason, appears in The Literary Diary of Ezra Stiles, ed. Franklin Bowditch Dexter, 3 vols., N.Y., 1901, 2:473–474. A somewhat longer extract, presumably submitted by JA, appeared in the Gazette de Leyde of 15 December. There Jean Luzac took issue with Stiles' characterization of Maj. John André as “the Seducer,” attributing it to the author's attachment to the American cause. According to Luzac, impartial observers mourned André's loss as a victim “des fureurs de la Guerre.”

2.

Probably Arthur Lee's letter of 28 Sept. (above), which JA answered on 6 Dec. (2d letter, below).