Papers of John Adams, volume 6

Jonathan Williams to the Commissioners, 28 April 1778 Williams, Jonathan First Joint Commission at Paris JA

1778-04-28

Jonathan Williams to the Commissioners, 28 April 1778 Williams, Jonathan First Joint Commission at Paris Adams, John
Jonathan Williams to the Commissioners
Nantes April 28. 1778

My last to your Excellencies was of the 18th Instant since which I am without any of your Favours.1

I sometime since received from Holland 13 Bales and Packages containing oznaburgs,2 Sail Cloth, Medicines &c, which the Shippers informed me were on Account of Mr. Grand, from whom I had no advice relative to the Business, I in consequence wrote to him, and have for answer that altho' the Goods were shipped in his Name they are on your Account: I beg to know how they are to be disposed of. I have also lately received 196 67 Swivels from Holland without advice, I wrote to Mr. Dean in consequence and had for answer that they were part of Mr. Merkles contract, and were paid for by the Commissioners. My Duty, here obliges me to inform you, that these Swivels altho' new, are the worst I ever saw, and I had rather see them sold for old Iron, than that any american should risque the Loss of his Hand by putting a Match to them. I have also from the same place 19 Cases and 5 Casks without advice or knowledge of their Contents. On examination I find the former to be arms, and the latter Locks and other Musket furniture. These with about 2500 Suits of Cloaths that remain, 55 Cases of Sabres, 14 Cases of Copper, and between 3 and 400 Cases of repaired arms in the Magazine form the quantity of Goods on Hand. I beg to know how they are to be conveyed to America as I find I shall be able to get but a very trifle, if any, on board of the americans that are here. I forgot to add to the quantity of Goods about 30 Tons of Anchors, that I have imported from Spain on the public Account. As Mr. Dean is absent it is necessary to explain this transaction. When I was fitting the Frigate3 I found it impossible to procure Anchors for her here. It was therefore necessary to send to Spain, from whence they come as cheap, excellent in quality, and generaly with as much expedition as from any where else; As we were in want of Ballast it was determined, with Mr. Deans approbation, to add to the quantity 2 Setts of heavy anchors for the 74 Gun Ships that were building in America, which would at once serve as Ballast to the Ship, and be a reasonable supply. Unfortunately the Vessell that was to bring these Anchors was obliged to put back having sprung a leak, she was condemned, and the anchors were then obliged to wait another opportunity; this reduced me to the necessity of borrowing a Sett for the Frigate from the Kings yard at L'orient, which the Commissary consented to spare me on my promise to replace them from the Forges in that neighbourhood. These therefore are still to be paid for. The Anchors from Spain have arrived at last and remain to be sent out, they are of a superiour Quality, and would be an important acquisition were they in America. Perhaps the Boston might take them in. You may think me tediously particular, but I had rather fall into that Error than let any transaction of mine be obscure or unexplained. When I have the Honour to appear before you I mean to pursue the same plan in everything that relates to public Service, since I have been in its employ.

68

I imagine that I shall not have occasion to draw for more than 20,000 Livres more to finish my Account on the public Account, except the above article of Anchors. As soon as my Health will permit I will submit all my Accounts to your Excellencies. I have the honour to be with the greatest Respect Your most obed Servant

Jon Williams

RC (PPAmP: Franklin Papers); docketed: “Mr J. Williams 28 Ap. 1778”; in another hand: “Wms 28 Apl 78.”

1.

No replies have been found to the letter of either the 18th or the 28th.

2.

A variant form of Osnaburg, which is a corruption of Osnabrück, a North German town. The word is used here to describe a kind of coarse linen cloth manufactured at Osnabrück ( OED ).

3.

This was the frigate Deane ( Dict. Amer. Fighting Ships , 2:248; Deane Papers , 5:443

To Samuel Tucker, 29 April 1778 JA Tucker, Samuel

1778-04-29

To Samuel Tucker, 29 April 1778 Adams, John Tucker, Samuel
To Samuel Tucker
Dear sir Passi. 29th. April 1778

I this Moment had the Pleasure of your Letter of the 22d Instant, and am much obliged to you for your kind Congratulations on my safe Arrival, and agreable Reception here.

The Commissioners have recommended a Lieut to you. Mr. Livingston, a Gentleman of good Character, as the Commissioners believe. But, altho the Hon. Commissioners have recommended him, as first Lieut. I hope he will, decline this, and be content to be made second Lieut,1 as I have a great opinion of and Esteem for Mr. Recd, I could wish him to be first. However this must be left to you. Mr. Livingston is said to be a Man of an handsome Fortune and good Connections.

You will see by your orders,2 which Captn. Palmes will deliver you that, your future Cruise and Voyage will be left to yourself—may God preserve and prosper, you and the ship and her Company.

I shall ever retain a pleasing Remembrance of, the Civilities received from you, and the agreable Hours We Spent together on Board the Boston, notwithstanding all our bad Weather and disagreable Chases.

I have written to Mr. Bondfield,3 to put a few Things on board your ship, for my family—if you will take the Charge of them, I shall be much obliged to you. I had rather they should take their Chance with you, how long soever you may cruise than by any other Vessell: because I have great Confidence in your Vigilance, Prudence and Activity, of which I have written both to Congress 69 and the Navy Board. I am, with much Affection & Esteem, Your Friend, & sert

John Adams

RC (MH-H: Tucker Papers)

1.

Muscoe Livingston agreed to serve as second lieutenant (Samuel Tucker to the Commissioners, 29 April, below).

2.

For Tucker's orders, see the Commissioners' letter to him of 13 April (above).

3.

That of 12 April (not found), but see John Bondfield to JA, 28 April, note 1 (above).