Papers of John Adams, volume 5

From John Winthrop, 17 September 1776 Winthrop, John JA

1776-09-17

From John Winthrop, 17 September 1776 Winthrop, John Adams, John
From John Winthrop
Dear Sir Cambridge Septr 17. 1776

I have received your favor of —— but it is so old a date, that I am ashamed to put it down.1 I should have answerd it seasonably, and congratulated you on the glorious Declaration of Independence which has long been the object of my wishes, as well as yours. But by all the accounts I have had, I have been expecting you here from week to week. This Declaration you have at last obtained, tho I doubt not, with infinite struggles. I do not at all wonder you are weary, tho I am heartily Sorry for it. For the sake of your personal ease, for the happiness of your amiable Family and your Friends, and for the particular advantage of this State, I should be glad of your return; but when I consider the vast importance of the department you are now acting in, and the very critical situation of this great Continent, I cannot help wishing, that your patience might hold out a little longer.

By the Papers, I find that Dr. Franklin, Judge Adams and Mr. Rutledge are appointed a Committee to confer with the two Hs. Would it not be better, to have this conference (if it must be called so) carried on in writing, than by a personal interview? Litera Scripta manet.2 I am in no pain for the independence of America, while in the hands of men whose sagacity and firmness are beyond all question, but I apprehend, the conference treaty, in whatever way it be managed, must be fruitless. I cannot suppose those Commissioners have power to treat with America as an independent State; and, till that affair is settled, which I trust the Congress will never give up, it should seem to little purpose, to treat of other matters. This grand affair must be decided by war, not by treaty. Our inveterate enemies will never give it up, till they find themselves compelled to it. I hope we shall be able to prosecute this war effectually and successfully. Our principal defect at present is in the article of cannon; which are here very scarce, and in such demand for privateers, that they have risen to an enormous price. Our privateers have met with great success; but our Bay is infested with 3 or 4 frigates, which have retaken some valuable Prizes, and interrupt our coasting trade. If the Continental ships built in New England could be furnished with cannon, and ordered upon this service, I should hope they would clear the coast of these cruisers, and perhaps take some of them. The General Court last week made 28application to Congress for such orders; and if they obtain them will supply cannon for one of those ships at Newbury, tho at the expence of stripping our Forts.3

Yesterday a Resolve passed for erecting a public Foundery,4 which I hope before another year will supply us with all the cannon we shall want. The Court has ordered near a fifth of our Militia for New York.5 I hope they will soon arrive there, and that General Washington will be able to prevent the enemy from gaining footing on the Main.

The Superior Court are now on their western circuit. General Warren, you doubtless know, has declined a seat on that bench. The place is not yet filled up; but I suppose Mr Sergeant of Haverhill will be the man.

When you return, no man will embrace you with greater pleasure than, Dear Sir, Your affectionate Friend and humble Servt

RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Dr. Winthrop Sept 17. 1776.”

1.

JA's last letter to Winthrop known to the editors that Winthrop could have received was dated 23 June (vol. 4:331). JA's letter of 4 Sept., printed in MHS, Colls. , 5th ser., 4:311, and calendared in JA, Papers, is omitted here.

2.

The written letter remains. The rest of the quotation is verbum imbelle perit—the weak word perishes.

3.

The General Court having resolved on 13 Sept. to arm one of the Continental warships, the Council on the next day selected the Boston. The General Court's letter to the congress suggesting that such ship free the Massachusetts coast of British warships is in the Council records (Mass., House Jour. , 1776–1777, 2d sess., p. 104, 108; Records of the States, Microfilm, Mass. 1.1a, Reel No. 12, Unit 2, p. 575–576, 584–585).

4.

The House had proposed a furnace on 14 Sept., the Council concurring on the 16th ( House Jour. , p. 106; Records of the States, p. 597).

5.

On 12 Sept. the General Court resolved to raise militia to aid Washington in New York, but subsequently the upper chamber successfully proposed that the militia from two of the counties, Plymouth and Barnstable, go to Rhode Island to replace a Continental battalion there. Originally, James Warren was chosen to lead the militia to New York, but upon his request to be excused, Benjamin Lincoln was named in his place ( House Jour. , p. 106; Records of the States, p. 545–549, 553–554, 586; Warren to JA, 19 Sept., below).

From Samuel Holden Parsons, 17 September 1776 Parsons, Samuel Holden JA

1776-09-17

From Samuel Holden Parsons, 17 September 1776 Parsons, Samuel Holden Adams, John
From Samuel Holden Parsons
Dear Sir post 17 September 1776

I don't wish to Complain when the Public Service will not be injurd by Silence: two Things must be attended to in the new raising Army or in my Opinion the Men will not engage in the Service; the One is that Ample Provision be made for the Sick, who the last Campaign have been Scandalously and inhumanly neglected, and made a Sacrifice to Points of Honor between Phi-29sicians of different Classes: at Times I have tho't this was designedly done to effect a general Discontent in the Army, to which it had a great Tendency and in a Measure answerd the Purpose, as very great and general Uneasiness on this Account has and Still does prevail among Us. Whither this arises altogether from the Director General1 or Partly from Him and partly from the regimental Physicians I will not undertake to determine; I know the Director has endeavord to set the regimental Doctors in a most infamous Point of Light, many of them are Gentlemen of Skill and Honor, some undoubtedly deserve a different Character; to my Knowledge in many Instances the Sick have been Obliged to purchase their own necessary food; Nothing being to be deliverd to the regimental Sick nor any Room to receive them into the General Hospital. Whilst I had the Charge of One Regiment only I expended about 30£ for their Support, my Family is now too large for me to provide for a Brigade.

Doctor Morgan seems to be a Gentleman of Learning, but little acquainted with the Manner of carrying his theoretic Plans into Execution; however this must be alterd or the Army will be ruined.

Another more dangerous Practice and of most fatal Tendancy is the general and illeberal Reflections so freely dealt out at Head Quarters, for the Misconduct of Individuals blasting the Reputation of whole States. This is the daily practice, and every Measure is Used to create a Disaffection between the Northern and Southern Colonies; when I say tis the Practice at Head Quarters, I by no Means would be Understood that tis a Practice countenanced by the General. Tis far otherwise; nor do I know any Person there but the Adjutant General2 who assiduously indeavors to make and promote this Disaffection: it has already risen to such a Height that the Pensylvania and New England Troops would as soon fight each other as the Enemy, where 'twill end I can't tell, but am certain when Officers of all Ranks are indiscriminately treated in a most contemptible Manner and whole Colonies publickly traduced and vilified as Cheats, Knaves, Cowards, Poltroons, Hipocrites and every Term of Reproach, for no other Reason but because they are Situated East of N York; is a Practice which will not be supported and in my Opinion if that Man is not removed from his Place the Army will be ruin'd and the Colonies effectually divided: Many of the 30best Officers from the North will never again enter the service if he is not removed.

Every Honor is paid to the Merit of good Men from the South. The Merit, if such be possible, from the North is not Acknowledged, but if too apparent to be blasted with Falshood is carefully buried in Oblivion, the Cowardice or Misbehavior of the South is carefully coverd over. The least Misconduct in the Gentlemen of the North is published with large Comments and Aggrevations; these are Matters Men of Feeling cannot Submit to, and are what will more tend to the Destruction of the Country than any One other Thing. I do not feel on my own Account. I have not to my Knowledge been treated amiss, if I had been Used as I know he has treated others I would plunge a Dagger in his Heart. I have never heard a Remark made and perhaps you have not on Col. Miles on Long Island who so negligently kept his Guard as to Suffer the Enemy to get 2 Miles in rear of the Guards without Discovery,3 nor have I heard a word said About the Pensylvania and New York Troops who kept the Guard on another Road who all to a Man ran Away on the first Appearance of the Enemy and let them thro' that Pass.4 Yet every Misconduct of Officers and Soldiers in the NE Troops are painted in the worst Colours. Truth has no Place in the Representations. Wittness a Paragraph in the Philadelphia Paper of the 18th. Sept.5 in which there is not a Syllable of Truth except that Genl. Putnam came out of the City with the Guards. Genl. Scott's Brigade was at the Lines when the Enemy landed: mine was never there nor orderd there, though I confess they behaved in a very improper Manner that Day, when before and since no Troops fought better. Genl. Miflin was not near my Brigade nor the Place of landing that Day and could be in no Situation to see or Judge the Conduct of any of the Troops. These Things I mention with Concern for the Influence they have on the general Cause of our Country; I write them in Confidence to you not expecting Any other Use will be made of them than for your Information of the Facts. When you know the Dangerous State we are in by such Conduct, you will take such Measures to Assertain the Facts and prevent the Evil. Your Wisdom shall direct you without Mention of my Name which for Particular Reasons I choose should at present be kept secret. I am with Esteem yr. Friend & hl Servt

S. H. Parsons
31

RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “S. H. Parsons 1776.”

1.

Dr. John Morgan.

2.

Joseph Reed of New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

3.

Col. Samuel Miles was given the responsibility of overseeing the constant patrolling of the pass on the far left of American forward positions. Parsons went into more detail in his letter to JA of 8 Oct. (below). Historian Henry P. Johnston believed, however, that Miles was given a very difficult responsibility ( Campaign around New York and Brooklyn , p. 158).

4.

On the west road along the Narrows (Parsons to JA, 8 Oct., below).

5.

The offensive paragraph included these sentences: “The brigade under General Parsons were soon obliged to retire from the waterside, and give ground for the enemy to land. General Mifflin immediately marched from Mount Washington with a thousand men, to the ground near and below this place [Harlem], where he made a stand, threw up some works, rallied our retreating troops, and in an hour after had the principal part of our army (who were stationed below us) drawn up in good order on the heights” (Force, Archives , 5th ser., 2:352, probably taken from the Pennsylvania Journal). Compare this account with that given in William Tudor to JA, 23 Sept., note 2 (below).