Papers of John Adams, volume 5

From James Warren, 23 March 1777 Warren, James JA

1777-03-23

From James Warren, 23 March 1777 Warren, James Adams, John
From James Warren
My dear Sir Boston March 23d. 1777

I wrote you last from Plymouth about three weeks ago1 after which I was detained at Home longer than I Expected and did not get here till last Tuesday. I Understand that Letter and one 125wrote at the same time to Mr. Adams went by the Post. As I wrote with some freedom I should be glad to hear of the receipt of it. Since I have been here I have had the pleasure of yours of the 17th. Feby. and am glad to find the New Govts. in the Southern States so well Established and things going so Agreably to your mind.

Your reflections on the Changes in Congress are very Natural. I have the same feelings. I love to see the same faces, and Lament the Loss of my old Acquaintance and Connections, but Changes and Vicissitudes we must Expect in the state we are now in and perhaps it is in many Instances best, if not all,2 it should be so, and in political Bodies more especially.

The New Army has been raised very slowly, and it is probable many Advantages must be lost by it, but I hope we shall Compleat it at last. If our Assembly could be kept from any New Measures I believe we should soon get ours, but they have an Unaccountable Itch to be meddleing every day, and by that means keep the Minds of the people always afloat, make them mercenary,3 and uncertain when to Engage if Inclined. We have however under all the disadvantages ariseing from the Instability of our own Conduct got as near as I can collect about 7000 Non Commissioned Officers and privates, and they are now Inlisting fast. The Idea of a Levy on the several Towns which we have I think Injudiciously and without any necessity held up has Occasioned An Immense Expence to Individuals in Addition to the publick Bounty. We have lately voted the same Bounty to A Battalion of the Train as we gave before, and are now sollicited to do the same for three new Battalions. I suppose we must Comply and Comfort ourselves with the hopes that it is but for once.

We have had no News for some time till the Arrival of A French Ship at Portsmouth4 with A valuable Cargo, and Agreable Intelligence which you will have more perfectly than I can give you, gratified for a Moment our Curiosity, raised our Spirits and gave us a subject of Conversation. I shall therefore only Congratulate you on this Occasion, and Inform you that we have three or four vessels out, to furnish the other Ships Expected here with Pilots, and orders are given to receive them with Ceremony, Salutes &c. No Attempt has yet been made upon Rhode Island which was Expected and preperations made for it long ago, and now we are not in A Condition for it, for tho the British Troops are many of them gone, not more than 2500 remaining 126ours are reduced in A greater proportion. In short there are but About 500 Men from this state in Addition to the Troops of their own State. Applications are made to us for A reinforcement, and A Committee are now Considering in what way it shall be done. Our Sea Coasts and perticularly this harbour is also in A defenceless state and must be provided for. All these things are difficulties that Interfere with Compleating our quota, and Embarrass us much. New Hampshire have got their part of the Army some time ago, but Connecticut are more behind hand than we are.

Genl. Ward resigned his Command last Thursday to Heath. What he is designed to Command I know not. I neither see or hear of any men. About three hundred men only are here besides Crafts Regiment and their time Expires in about 10 days.

But no One thing gives me more Uneasiness than the Conduct of your Fleet. The Hancock, Boston, Alfred and Cabot5 are all yet in port. It is said the Hancock is ready to sail and was to have gone yesterday but remains here yet. I fear the Consequences of their going out single, but McNeil and Manly it is said like the Jews and Samaritans will have no Connections or Intercourse. They will not sail together. I beleive McNeil is near ready for the sea. I am told that he and the Agent Mr. Cushing have had A Breeze,6 but I am not Acquainted with the perticulars or how it terminated. I have still a worse Account of the situation of your frigates at Providence.7 I dont know the Officers but Understand to say no more of them that they are not Agreable to the people and never can Man their Ships. You must fall on some New plan for Conducting your Naval Affairs at a distance from you, or be Content never to Shine in that way. Perhaps to Establish A Board in each district upon An honourable footing, and with Extensive powers or something (I know not what) else. If you should have occasion for A New Commander for one of your Ships I would venture to recommend one I think equal to the Business, and perhaps to Any you have. Capt. Simeon Samson who was lately taken in the service of this State I have A very good Opinion of as A Seaman, A Man of Judgment, prudence, Activity and Courage.8 He behaved like a Hero in the Action, but the force against him was so superiour to his that he had no Chance. He is yet in Captivity but his redemption is Expected very soon as proper measures are taken for it. Our Measures in General Court are so Complicated and various that it would take A volume to give you An Account of them.

127

The regulateing Act9 has been Observed in some places, and disregarded in Others, and perticularly here where it is Constantly violated in Open day light, and has yet produced no Other Consequences but Bitterness and wrath between the Town and Country, the last of which is Endeavouring to starve the Town in return for what they Consider Ill usage from them and have succeeded so well, that the Market here is little superiour to what it was in the seige.

I ever thought this Act Impracticable in its Nature, and prophecied that it would End in bringing the Authority of Goverment into Contempt. My prophecies are likely to be Compleated. Now I mention Goverment I will tell you that one day this week is Assigned to determine in what way A New one shall be formed. I fear the determination will be in favour of A Convention.

This is designed to go by Major Ward, who was Aid de Camp to the General of that Name, by whom also I shall forward A packet received this day from your good Lady. This Gentleman I suppose is known to you, if not I beg leave to recommend him to your Notice.10 He has had the Misfortune to fall into A very Inactive department, and now to be wholly Excluded from any Appointment in the Army. I take him however to be A Sensible, worthy Man, and one very Capable of doing publick service in some way or other. I believe it is time to Conclude this long scroll. I am therefore with wishes for your happiness Your Friend &c.

My regards to Mr. Adams and Gerry. I shall write to one or both of them by this Opportunity if I can.

RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Warren March 23d 1777 ans. Ap. 6.”

1.

His letter of 22 Feb. (above).

2.

Commas supplied around “if not all.”

3.

That is, by raising bounties.

4.

The ship's arrival was not reported in the Boston newspapers, except perhaps indirectly. On 24 March the Boston Gazette reported the arrival of two high-ranking French officers, both named, and right afterward listed the cargo of a vessel that had arrived safely in one of the ports of the United States. The list included such items as 11,987 stands of arms and 1,000 barrels of gunpowder. Apparently security forbade mention of the ship's name or port of entry.

5.

The frigates Boston and Hancock and the brig Cabot, commanded, respectively, by Hector McNeill, John Manley, and Joseph Olney, had not yet been to sea. The ship Alfred, John Paul Jones captain, had returned to Boston on 17 Dec. 1776 from a successful cruise to Cape Breton ( Naval Docs. Amer. Rev. , 7:12, note 4; Hopkins to Burroughs, p. 1152, note 2; p. 330, note 3; p. 1109).

6.

A quarrel or row ( OED ).

7.

The Providence and the Warren, commanded, respectively, by Abraham Whipple and John B. Hopkins ( Naval Docs. Amer. Rev. , 7:188, note 2, and Index).

8.

Capt. Simeon Sampson of the Massachusetts brig Independence, which was captured on 25 Nov. 1776 (same, 7:271). The brig was recaptured and entered a 128safe port on 21 March (Independent Chronicle, 27 March).

9.

That is, the act to regulate prices. See William Tudor to JA, 16 March, note 5 (above).

10.

It is perhaps surprising that Warren was unaware of how frequently Joseph Ward and JA had corresponded.

To James Warren, 24 March 1777 JA Warren, James

1777-03-24

To James Warren, 24 March 1777 Adams, John Warren, James
To James Warren
Dear sir Philadelphia March 24. 1777

This Morning, a Vessell1 has arrived in this City with 6800 stand of excellent Arms and 1500 Gun Locks, belonging to Congress and 1500 more private Property. These last We have ordered to be bought.

This News you may depend on, the Letters were brought into Congress, in the Midst of a Debate concerning a Resolution to impower the General to procure Arms wherever he could find them.2

Thus, it is—on how many Occasions, when We have been unable to see any Way to help ourselves has Providence, Sent Us an unexpected Relief! Thus it has been, and thus it will be. I am, &c.

John Adams

RC (MHi:Warren-Adams Coll.); docketed: “Mr J. Adams Lettr March 77.”

1.

The vessel was the brig Sally, Capt. Stocker, from Nantes (Pennsylvania Gazette, 26 March).

2.

The Journal makes no mention of this particular debate ( JCC , 7:197).

From Samuel Freeman, 25 March 1777 Freeman, Samuel JA

1777-03-25

From Samuel Freeman, 25 March 1777 Freeman, Samuel Adams, John
From Samuel Freeman
Sir Boston March 25 1777

Being informed that you are of a Committee of Congress, appointed to consider what further Regulations are necessary to be made in the Post Establishment1—I beg leave to recommend to your attention the present plan of riding between this Town and Falmouth2 Casco Bay (of which Place I have the Honor of being Post Master) and to propose an alteration therein.

The Post Rider from Falmouth sets out on Wednesdays and arrives at Portsmouth on Thursdays, where the Mail rests until the Tuesday following, when Noble3 takes it and brings it to this Town Wednesday Evenings so that a Letter is 8 Days coming about 120 Miles. The return is in 4 Days, thus.

Noble sets out from hence on Thursday, and gets to Portsmouth on Fridays, where Bernard,4 the Eastern Rider, takes the Mail and carries it into Falmouth Sabbath Day. Now it appears 129to me that it is a very easy matter for the Riders to conduct so as that the Mail may be but three Days coming and three returning. Bernard may leave Falmouth on Monday Morning, and get to Portsmouth by Tuesday Noon. There will then be full Time for Noble (if he is not detain'd by private Business which I imagine prevents his doing it now) full time I say for Noble to reach Newbury Port Tuesday Night—and then to Boston Wednesday night. The return might be in like manner viz, Noble may go from this to Portsmouth in 1½ Day, and Bernard from thence to Falmouth in the same Time.

By this Method, a Gentleman may write a Letter in this Town to another in Falmouth—and have an Answer in 7 Days—wheras according to the present Plan it takes 14. The Correspondence with Gentlemen at Falmouth 'tis true is not at present very great—but it doubtless increase soon.

And I think for the Dignity of the Establishment this regulation ought to take place.

I mention'd it to Mr. Hazard5 when he was here (after he had agreed with the Riders) and he referrd the matter to Mr. Libby Post Master at Portsmouth,6 but Mr. Libby for answer writes me that he thinks the Plan is impracticable as the Roads now are, because he thinks Bernard cannot take Nobles Mail (from Boston) and carry it to Falmouth and be back again to Portsmouth before Noble sets out from thence. But certainly if Noble is not tardy he can very easily come to Boston in 1½ Days, and go from hence to Portsmouth in the same time—and then Bernard can easily perform his Duty.

I shou'd be obliged to you to talk with Mr. Hazard, as also with the other Gentlemen your Brethren of this State on the Subject, and though it is not a matter of a very Public Nature, should be glad it might meet with your attention—and if you judge it reasonable that you wou'd see that the necessary Orders are given for the alteration.

I am told that Mr. Hastings the Post Master of this Town has presented a Memorial to Congress praying for an Allowance for his extra Services.7 He is a worthy faithful Gentleman, and I think the peculiar situation of his Office intitules him to a Grant in additional to his present Income. I beg leave therefore to recommend his Memorial to your Patronage.

Next Thursday is assign'd by the House to take under consideration the expediency of entring on measures for forming a New Constitution of Government.

130

I wish we cou'd have the Forms of other States to assist in case we should go upon that important Business. I have the Honour to be with respect Your Honors most obed & very huml servt

Saml Freeman8

P.S. We want much the Journals of Congress.

RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “S. Freeman Esq. ans. Ap. 27.”

1.

The committee was appointed on 17 Feb. (JA's Additional Committee Assignments, 2 Jan. – 6 Nov., above).

2.

Now Portland, Maine.

3.

Probably John Noble (Laws of New Hampshire, 10 vols., 1904–1922, 4:610).

4.

Joseph Barnard (William Willis, The History of Portland, 2d edn., Portland, Maine, 1865, facsim. edn., 1972, p. 585).

5.

Ebenezer Hazard (1744–1817), appointed in late 1776 as a surveyor general of the Continental post office, later became postmaster general ( DAB ).

6.

Probably Jeremiah Libbey (New Hampshire State Papers Series, ed. Nathaniel Bouton and others, 40 vols., Concord, N.H., 1867–1943, 13:286, 294, 295, 297, 301).

7.

Jonathan Hastings Jr.'s memorial was read on 19 March ( JCC , 7:184).

8.

Freeman was one of Falmouth's members in the House of Representatives (Mass., House Jour. , 1776–1777, 1st sess., p. 5).