Papers of John Adams, volume 3

III. Form Letter Requesting Information on British Depredations, 19 October 1775 JA Deane, Silas Wythe, George Continental Congress

1775-10-19

III. Form Letter Requesting Information on British Depredations, 19 October 1775 Adams, John Deane, Silas Wythe, George Continental Congress
III. Form Letter Requesting Information on British Depredations
Philadelphia, 19 Oct. 1775 Sir

The continental congress having been pleased to appoint us a committe1 for collecting an account of the hostilities committed by the ministerial troops and navy in America, since last March, with proper evidence of the truth of the facts related, the number and value of the buildings destroyed, and of the vessels inward and outward bound seised, by them as nearly as can be ascertained, and also the stock taken by them from different parts of the continent, as you may see by the resolve inclosed; we entreat the assistance of the convention of your colony in this business, that we may be enabled to perform what is required of us, in the manner and with the expedition congress expects; and, to that end you will be pleased to furnish us with the necessary materials sending to us clear distinct full and circumstantial details of the hostile and destructive acts, and the captures 141or seizures and depredations in your colony, and accurate estimates of the loss and damage with the solemn examinations of witnesses, and other papers and documents officially authenticated. We are, Sir, Your obedient humble servants,

Silas Deane John Adams George Wythe

MS (PHi:Sprague CoIl.).

1.

This letter was the work of the committee formed on 18 Oct. to obtain “a just and well authenticated account of the hostilities committed by the ministerial troops and navy in America since last March” ( JCC , 3:298–299). For JA's comments on the committee and its purpose, see his letters to James Warren of 12, 18, and 19 (1st) Oct. (below). No indication of when or whether this committee reported to congress has been found.

IV. Resolution of the Congress on New Hampshire Government, 3 November 1775 JA Rutledge, John Ward, Samuel Lee, Richard Henry Sherman, Roger Continental Congress

1775-11-03

IV. Resolution of the Congress on New Hampshire Government, 3 November 1775 Adams, John Rutledge, John Ward, Samuel Lee, Richard Henry Sherman, Roger Continental Congress
IV. Resolution of the Congress on New Hampshire Government

3 November 1775. Dft not found. printed: JCC , 3:319. Based on a report (not found) from a committee appointed 26 October composed of John Rutledge, JA, Samuel Ward, Richard Henry Lee, and Roger Sherman, which reported on 3 November (same, 3:307, 319).

On 18 October the delegates from New Hampshire laid before their colleagues instructions from their province which asked the advice of the congress “with respect to a method of our administering Justice, and regulating our civil police” (same, 3:298). The congress recommended the calling of “a full and free representation of the people” and the establishment of a government that would promote the people's happiness and secure good order during the dispute with Great Britain.

In his Autobiography JA recalled that when the New Hampshire delegates presented their instructions, he took the opportunity to harangue “on the Subject at large” and to urge the congress “to resolve on a general recommendation to all the States to call Conventions and institute regular Governments” ( Diary and Autobiography , 3:354–357). The congress was deeply divided on the issue, but according to JA, some began to come around. If he spoke as he claimed, he was anticipating by some seven months his motion for independent governments offered in May 1776. Again, JA's recollection may very well have been inaccurate. At any rate, moderates saw to it that the advice to New Hampshire was to be operative only until the dispute was settled. In private correspondence, where the need for circumspection was less, JA saw more than temporary possibilities (JA to Elbridge Gerry, 5 Nov., note 4, below; see also his first letter to James Warren of 6 July, note 6, above).

printed: ( JCC , 3:319).

142