Adams Elected to Membership in Supporters of the Bill of Rights, 21 September 1773
Wilson, Thomas
JA
1773-09-21
Adams Elected to Membership in Supporters of the Bill of Rights, 21 September 1773
Wilson, Thomas
Adams, John
Adams Elected to Membership in Supporters of the Bill of Rights
London Tavern, 21st. Sepr., 1773
Sir
Supporters of the Bill of Rights.1
In pursuance of a Resolution of this Society, I am to signify to you that you have this Day been duly elected a Member thereof.
I am, Sir! Your most humble Servant,
Thomas Wilson Chairman.
Signed by his order, John Wilkes
N.B. Subscriptions are received by frederick bull, Esq; Treasurer to this society, at his House in Leadenhall-Street, No. 96.2
354
Printed form on folded sheet approx. 13 by 8 inches (Adams Papers); addressed: “John Adams Esqr. Boston”; endorsed on address leaf: “Jan'y 25. 74 Society of bill of rights.” For letter of transmittal on the verso, see note 2, below.
1.
Presumably at the suggestion of John Horne Tooke, the Society of Supporters of the Bill of Rights had been started in 1769 while John Wilkes was in prison to raise money for his debts and election expenses (Tooke in
DNB
). By 1771, the society, split over the issue of raising money for Wilkes, had announced a reform program that included reducing the length of life of Parliaments, more nearly equal representation, and decreasing the number of placemen in the Commons (J. R. Pole, Political Representation in England and the Origins of the American Republic, N.Y., 1966, p. 428–429). No record has been found to show whether JA contributed money to the cause.
2.
On the verso appears the following letter, endorsed at the foot, “rec'd. Jan. 25 1774”:
Sir
London, 15th Octor. 1773
I have the honor of transmitting you the inclosed Resolution of the Society of the Bill of Rights which was unanimous.
It affords me great pleasure to find so very respectable a Gentleman of America, disposed to unite with the Friends of Liberty in England for our mutual safety and Defence.
I am most respectfully your very Obedient Humble Servant,
Stephen Sayre
Sayre, whom JA may have met during his visits to New England in 1766 and 1772, credited himself with being the “chief founder” of the Supporters, but he tended greatly to exaggerate his accomplishments and importance (Sibley-Shipton, Harvard Graduates
, 14:207). For a brief sketch of Sayre and bibliographic references for his career, see
Adams Family Correspondence
, 4:264–265, note.
From Mercy Otis Warren, 11 October 1773
Warren, Mercy Otis
JA
1773-10-11
From Mercy Otis Warren, 11 October 1773
Warren, Mercy Otis
Adams, John
Plimouth October 11 1773
To Mr. Adams1
Though short! Far short my pen of the sublime,
Fate urges on and bids me write in Rhyme,
And hope my Friend the Effort will Excuse,
Nor Blame the Heart: but Chide the Niggard Muse.
Is it A Wild Enthusiastick Flame,
That swells the Bosom panting after Fame,
Dilates the Mind, while Ev'ry sails unfurl'd,
To Catch the plaudit of a Gazing World.
Is there no permanent, no steady pole,
To point us on, and Guide the Wandring soul,
Does prejudice, and passion, Rule Mankind.
Are there no springs that actuate the Mind,
Whose deep Maeanders, have some Nobler source,
Than Vain self Love; to Guide their Winding Course.
355
That Gen'rous ardor stile'd Benevolence,
Is it an art to Gratify the sense,
Or Give imagination further scope,
That aeiry queen, who Guides the Helm of hope,
Holds A False Mirrour to the Dazzel'd sight,
A Dim perspective, A Delusive light,
That swells the Bubbles of Lifes shortned span,
While Wisdom smiles at the Deluded Man,
Wrap'd in Extaticks, by imagine'd Fame,
When the next Moment, Will Blot out his Name.
Cant the Wise precepts, of A platos school,
(or shall I Name a still more perfect Rule,)
Rouze up the soul, to that Exalted Height,
To Walk by Reason, And Reject the Cheat,
Or are the Fetters that Enslave the Mind
Of that Firm Base, that Adamantine kind,
So Firmly Lock'd, and so securely Reve'd,
The more we search, the More are we Deceived,
Are truth, and Friendship, no where to be Found,
And patriot Virtue, Nothing but A sound.
Then May A Cesar Equal Honours Claim,
With Noble Brutus, Celebrate'd Name,
For the poor tribute, of a short applause,
one stabs A tyrant trampling on the Laws,
While the proud Despot, Marks his Baneful Way
With Virtues tears and triumphs or'e his prey,
Self, the sole point in which they'r both agreed,
By this Romes shackled, or by this shes Free'd,
Self Love, that stimulous to Noblest aim,
Bids Nero Light the Capital in Flame,
Or Bids H—— sell his Native Land
And his Vile Brother Lend his perjure'd Hand,2
While Fredom weeps, and Heavn Delays to shed,
Its awful Vengeance on the Guilty Head.
If such is Life, And Fancy throw the Bowl,
If appetite and Caprice Rule the Whole,
If Virtuous Friendship, has no solid Base,
But False Deception, holds the sacred place,
Then from thy Mem'ry, Race out Ev'ry Line,
Nor Recolect one sentiment of mine,
356
But Dark oblivions sable Veil Draw ore,
And I'll Forbear to interupt the more.
For if Vice Boasts, her origen the same,
With social joy and patriotic Flame,
Then I must Wish to bid the World Farewell,
Turn Anchoret, and Choose some Lonely Cell,
Beneath some peaceful Hermitage Reclined,
To Weep the Misery, of all Mankind,
Till Days and years! till time shall Cease to roll,
And Truth Eternal strikes the Won'dring Soul.
MS
(Adams Papers) in the hand of Mercy (Otis) Warren. This unsigned poem was doubtless an enclosure in a letter which has since been lost.
1.
For Mrs. Warren's relationship with the Adamses, see
Adams Family Correspondence
, 1:84, note and references there.
2.
This reference is not to Gov. Hutchinson's brother, Foster, but to his late wife's brother-in-law, Lt. Gov. Andrew Oliver (1706–1774). Oliver was first charged with “perjury” by his political enemies for statements in his depositions concerning the debates of the Council on the Boston Massacre, 1770. Oliver's good faith was impugned again, in 1773, when his letters to Thomas Whately were published in the province. Disclosure of the “Whately letters” led the House of Representatives to petition the King on 23 June for the removal of Hutchinson and Oliver (Sibley-Shipton, Harvard Graduates
, 7:405–411; Mass., House Jour.
, 1773–1774, p. 75). For a detailed analysis of the impact of the Hutchinson-Oliver correspondence with Whately, see Bailyn, Thomas Hutchinson
, p. 223–257; for JA's contemporary comments on the letters, see
Diary and Autobiography
, 2:79–80, and note at 80–81.