This being the day fixed for the delivery of the Eulogy of La Fayette by Mr. Everett, Mr. Brooks, my Wife and I went to town in the Carriage. The day was very fine and the town seemed to be all in motion. I went to my house where I found my father, mother and Walter Hellen who had come from Quincy for the occasion. Thence to the State House. Being a member of the Committee of arrangements I enjoyed its privileges, though it must be confessed I have not troubled myself much with its pains. We were kept waiting for nearly two hours, but at last started upon a very long procession, the length of half the town. This took us until two o’clock. We reached Faneuil Hall and obtained seats not far from the Speaker—Being within one on his right. The Hall was appropriately decorated and the ceremonies effective.

Mr. Everett fulfilled the public expectation. It is now many years since the last time I heard him in the House of Representatives. He has gained in manner by throwing off the formality which still remained to him from the pulpit and by perfect ease and self possession. His modes of hitting the audience remain the same, brilliant contrasts, happy allusions, striking anecdotes, but there is no depth or maturity of thought, no greatness of view, no ingredients that make the Statesman or the Philosopher. As a popular festival Orator he will be unrivalled, but I doubt his success as a name for futurity. He appeared very much exhausted by his effort to speak, and closed sooner than he had intended.1

At four o’clock the ceremonies were through. I joined my father and 381father in law, and Walter Hellen to go to Mr. Frothingham’s to dine. My Mother and Wife, Edward and Sidney Brooks with his wife made up the company. We had a tolerably pleasant time and returned home quietly to Medford. But I was so very much fatigued that I could not remain long up.

The standing and walking and hearing and seeing in such a day fatigue me more than the hardest work. I am not fond of this overturn of life, not all the distinction in the world could make me think it more than a heavy tax one pays to society. The happiness of life is the quiet enjoyment of the pleasures of the world—The moderation of man’s desires, the peace of his conscience, the blessedness of his social relations. I hope that my aim will be good, that I shall be seduced by no jack a’ lantern to injure so much of those ingredients of happiness as I already possess.

The day was cloudy with so much rain that in the afternoon Mr. Brooks did not attend Church. We went in the morning and heard from Mr. Stetson a Sermon from 1 John 3. 2. “Beloved, now are we the sons of God and it doth not yet appear what we shall be; but we know that when he shall appear we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is.” He discussed as his subject for one half the day the question what we are, and how the sons of God; leaving the residue for the afternoon.

I read a Sermon by him preached lately upon the outrages at Charlestown. Text from 1 Peter 2. 13 to 16. “Submit yourselves unto every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake, whether it be to the king as supreme or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evil doers and for the praise of them that do well. For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men; as free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness but as servants of God.” He maintained the doctrine of Christianity to be a submission to the law, violence more especially to be foreign from it. Governments were either of men or of Laws, those of men were dangerous and despotic, those of law peaceful and moderate. Nobody here ought to complain of government for he 382had a right to a voice in changing it if unsatisfactory. The doctrine is sound but man is made blind by prosperity.

The remainder of the day I passed in reading German. This novel grew so interesting I could not leave it until after reaching the crisis.