The day was a disagreeable one. I went to the Office as usual. My time was engrossed first by the usual Accounts which are not quite closed, and afterwards by writing the fourth number of my series, the rough draught of which was at last accomplished. It has cost me a good deal of labour. Went to the Athenaeum and took a very short walk.

In the Afternoon, finished the Treatise de Amicitia, and had two hours in which I completed the fair Copy of my Article. These lag on so much that if I do not make a desperate effort to finish them I shall not do it. There remains but one Number to embrace all I have to say. But this will cost me some trouble. I do not know that the profit is worth the trouble.

Evening. I went down at a Meeting of the Debating Society. This had gone on so heavily that it was considered advisable to discuss the expediency of stopping it altogether. For myself though I should have been pleased to continue a really effective Society, yet I had no manner of doubt as to what should be done with this. Eloquence is not in very great favour with us if we are to judge of the total indifference to it on the part of the young men. Returned home regretting a foolishly spent Evening. Corrected my Article and read a little of the North American Review after which the Spectator.

The day was cold and raw. I arose quite late. Attended divine Service all day and heard Mr. Frothingham preach. His Text in the morning was from Luke. 2. 32. “A light to lighten the Gentiles.” A Commemoration of the Epiphany, or manifestation of the Saviour. He considered it as giving distinction to three points of his history. The adoration, the baptism and the first Miracle of Cana. The afternoon was from John’s 1st Epistle. 3. 2. “It doth not yet appear what we shall be.” The subject the disposition of mortality to know futurity and the fortunate limit that is set to our knowledge. I cannot follow his Sermons in detail. They are hard to take in from the disconnection of the reflections.

After my return, I read a Sermon of Massillon’s upon final impenitence. Text from John. 8. 21. “I go my way, and ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sins.” His division was this—1. The impossibility of an effectual repentance at the last moment from the state of the Creature 2. from the will of the Creator.1 The state of the creature might be owing to a sudden death, to a fear occasioned by remorse or to physical inability from disease. The will of the Creature to a total alienation from the abuse of every blessing and indulgence. The Text explains more clearly than the Preacher. For the latter in the second branch of his subject imputed to the Deity so many human and unworthy passions, that a pure mind must shrink with disgust from the idea of so singular a Divinity. Indeed this is the principal fault of Massillon. His zeal and his Oratorical exaggeration present to the imagination dreadful shapes. He sketches out an avenging being full of vengeance and destruction instead of the awful image of Justice and of Mercy. One other peculiarity I noticed in this Sermon. He says distinctly that each man bears stamped on his forehead at his birth the character he afterwards assumes, and that it is seen and formed by the Deity then. If so, how is man responsible for his faults and why 217should he be eternally condemned to torment for what no act of his could foresee or prevent? Such a faith does not suit me.

Evening. My Wife wrote to Washington2 and I read Articles in the North American and Quarterly. With some of which I was pleased. Afterwards I read over the seventeenth book of Pope’s Homer containing the battle for the body of Patroclus. The translation is wonderfully spirited. I wish it would not take too much time to read the original. Finished my Evening as usual with two numbers of the Spectator.