Diary of Charles Francis Adams, volume 2

343 Friday. 6th. CFA

1829-02-06

Friday. 6th. CFA
Friday. 6th.

Morning at the Office. Received very pleasant letters from my Father and Mother. The first was full of interest, being in his peculiar style. The second was very pleasant and disclosed more of the plans than usual. I am glad some of the servants are coming on. It will be a great advantage. On the whole, my spirits were more elated than usual. I was busy in copying the Paper on the Middlesex Canal. Dined at Mr. Frothingham’s with the family and Henry Brooks. He is very pleasant. Abby was not in very pleasant humour, so that I did not have a very agreeable afternoon. This is a candid confession but I am never disposed to make concealments. All I wish to do is to make allowances. Busy, the remainder of the afternoon. In the evening, called for Abby at Mrs. Warren’s. She is an old lady and a very coarse one. The family to whom Julia Gorham is connected are attentive to Abby, so she returns, but excepting the Gorhams, they are my aversion. Returned at ten, perfectly tired out.

Saturday. 7th. CFA

1829-02-07

Saturday. 7th. CFA
Saturday. 7th.

Morning at the Office. Engaged very busily in an answer to my father’s letter of yesterday. The famous pamphlet came out this morning, and I read it previous to my writing.1 It serves only the purpose of declaring the war. And I presume that in future we shall have no communication between the parties. I was exceedingly engaged with this letter and my Middlesex Canal Paper. It occupied me all the morning and until four o’clock in the afternoon, hard and constant labour.2

I then went to see Abby as usual and passed the afternoon pleasantly. The death of William Carter which had raised her sympathies very much for her friend Miss Carter was passing over, and she felt less sensitive than yesterday. My only fear about her is that upon entering the world she has too much to learn. Some mortification to experience and some sorrow to bear. In the evening I attended the Debating Society. The subject was the character of Napoleon as given by Dr. Channing.3 Although I had not expected at all to engage in the debate, yet as the question was interesting and my feelings gradually engaged, I hazarded a few words and did better than I expected. I am inclined to believe that I may yet succeed in improving my qualities as a speaker when I wear off the timidity which embarrasses me so much.

1.

The eighty-page pamphlet was titled Correspondence between John Quincy Adams, Esquire, President of the United States, and Several Citizens of Massa-344chusetts concerning the Charge of a Design to Dissolve the Union Alleged to Have Existed in That State, Boston, 1829. It reprinted the earlier documents in the controversy over JQA’s charge that New England Federalists had conspired to divide the Union, along with a detailed reply, dated 28 January 1829, from the “thirteen confederates” which claimed that JQA had failed to present any proof of his accusation. CFA thought that Harrison Gray Otis was the author (CFA to JQA, 7 Feb. 1829, LbC, Adams Papers).

2.

CFA’s “A Paper on the Middlesex Canal,” bearing the present date at the end, attempted to examine the income and expenditures of the corporation and to predict its future revenue and dividends. He concluded: “it is only a Property fit for Capitalists—Men who have no immediate necessity for revenue” (M/CFA/21, Adams Papers, Microfilms, Reel No. 315).

3.

See entry for 11 Nov. 1827, and note, above.