Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14

William Tudor to Abigail Adams, 9 January 1801 Tudor, William Adams, Abigail
William Tudor to Abigail Adams
My dear Madam Jany. 9th. 1801

It was with great Pleasure that I recognized the well known Hand writing, which it is so many years since I have seen. It was impossible not to avail myself of the Contents of the Note I found in the President’s Letter, in some prefatory Remarks which you will read in the Gazette, I have taken the Liberty to send you.1 Chagrined as I am with a late Event which has furnished so noble a Triumph to the Mad Enemies of the Constitution, I derive a sort of negative Satisfaction from it in the Mortification & total Defeat of Hamilton & the small but active & invenomed Faction which he stimulated & guided.

518

What is to become of the Government, our Finances, Commerce, Union, & Character, under the approaching New Order of Things, I shall patiently trust to the Developement of Time. But let who will command at home, I hope Mr. A. will have the Charge of our foreign Interests either at the Court of France or England.

I am with Sentiments of the most perfect Respect & Esteem / Dr Madam / your faithful Servant

Wm Tudor

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “[…] Adams / Washington”; internal address: “Mrs: Adams.” Some loss of text due to a cut manuscript.

1.

AA’s note has not been found. After a pause of sixteen months, JA and his former law student William Tudor resumed their correspondence, exchanging a dozen letters between 25 Feb. 1800 and 13 Feb. 1801. In a second letter of 25 Dec. 1800 (MHi:Tudor-Adams Correspondence), JA enclosed “authenticated Copies of the Messages” relating to the “Negotiation with france” and requested that Tudor have them published. Tudor complied and in a letter to JA of 9 Jan. 1801 (Adams Papers) noted having added “a few prefatory Observations” that were printed in the Boston Commercial Gazette, 8 Jan., along with three of JA’s letters to the Senate, dated 18 Feb. 1799, 25 Feb., and 1 June, and a 28 Sept. 1798 letter from Talleyrand to Louis André Pichon. The preface to the letters praised JA: “Mr. Adams will retire with the mens conscia recti from high and honorable toil, to a station which envy cannot reach, nor jealousy undermine. Posterity will pay what the present age has denied; and vindicate virtues, which party policy dare not, and phrenzied faction, cannot appreciate.”

John Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams, 14 January 1801 Adams, John Adams, Thomas Boylston
John Adams to Thomas Boylston Adams
My dear Son Washington January 14. 1801

I thank you for yours of the 9th and its contents, and for the pains to have taken to search Authorities upon the Collision of Treaties. The Point I think is explained and proved very fully, and So it is understood in England.

The Sixth Article however is by no means nugatory. It is of great importance to France. Our Treaty with Britain expires in two years after the termination of the present War between France and her. This Article of the Convention is intended, to secure to France a perfect equality with Britain in this particular after the expiration of our British Treaty. This matter was fully explained and understood, both by the French and American Ministers.

I wish you would tell me who Manlius is. The downfall of the federal cause, has been owing not to the Mission to France, but to the opposition to that measure: and the continuance of opposition to the Convention will serve no other purpose than to depress a certain description of the federalists Still more. The federal Party was composed of the most heterogeneous ingredients that were ever put 519 together. Their Objects were different—their means different—their Principles different. There was an Oligarchy among them as proud and despotic as the Government of Bern before the Revolution.1

I am, fully of your mind— If I had foreseen all the Consequences, I would not have refrained from the Antecedents.

A turn of Imagination to resentment and rage as Sudden as a tornado, decided the Conduct of the Old Tories and the British Agents, who called themselves the Federalists upon the first nomination of Mr Murray. Neither Principle nor reason had any share in it. Some men who had Sense and temper too, before that time, thought of nothing after it, but of defeating and if they could not defeat of disgracing the measure. They are still blindly determined on both. Is this principle or Passion? Reason or Madness? Some who were neither Old Tories nor British Agents, united with both from other motives. A long War with France, for a pretext to raise a regular Army, was desired by Some, for the purpose of Patronage and Influence, and by others to assist in forcing on the People a change of some sort in the Constitution.— I have taken some of these Phrases from the Idea of a Patriot King p. 165; when the conduct of a Party is described as very similar to this.2

I am, my dear Child your loving / Father

John Adams

RC (DLC:John Adams Papers); internal address: “T. B Adams Esq”; endorsed: “The President of the U.S. / 15th: January 1801. / 19th: Recd: / 20th: Ansd:.” FC (Adams Papers).

1.

Prior to the formation of the Helvetic Republic in 1798, the Swiss canton of Bern was governed by a sovereign council of 299 members who were appointed for life by the town’s aristocracy (vol. 12:348; Andre Vieusseux, The History of Switzerland, from the Irruption of the Barbarians to the Present Time, London, 1840, p. 183).

2.

Henry St. John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke, Letters on the Spirit of Patriotism: on the Idea of a Patriot King: and on the State of Parties, at the Accession of King George the First, rev. edn., London, 1767, p. 165.