Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14

Thomas Boylston Adams to John Quincy Adams, 12 October 1800 Adams, Thomas Boylston Adams, John Quincy
Thomas Boylston Adams to John Quincy Adams
No 20 19 Septr: 28th: Philadelphia 12th: October 1800.

Since the date of my last letter, I have received your several favors of the 10th: June Dup: 15th: July Dup: 10th: & 16th: July, with enclosures for some of your Louisa’s family; the last of which to her brother, was accompanied by a few lines from herself to me; for which I thank her. The enclosures have all been forwarded, but I have not heard directly from her friends for many weeks— I presume they are well however. I know not precisely, whether the balance of letters between your wife & me, is for or against me, but in either case I am willing to acknowledge myself her debtor, & to promise a speedy discharge of the debt;—at present, I can scarcely find time to acknowledge the receipt of your valuable & interesting communications.1 Qur annual elections are at hand, and all good folks are exerting their utmost, to keep things in order, & as they should be; which is a very difficult and laborious task. The darling priviledge of Election, is so constantly recurring in this Country, that the people are kept in a continual political ferment, and from every repetition of the exercise, they become more bewitched and infatuated with it. The 14th: currt: is the day for chusing members of Congress & of the State Legislature here; Electors for President will not be chosen, on account of the disagreement of the last Legislature upon the mode of election; so that Pennsylvania will probably have no vote in the College of Elector’s.2 We are so completely democratised, that I have no confidence in the success of any men or measures, which are advocated by the friends to the federal Government.

You may possibly be ready to suppose, that a pretty correct judgment might, at this moment, be formed, as to the probable result of the ensuing election, for chief Magistrate of the Union. I have as much information upon this subject, perhaps, as can be collected from the public prints; private, I have none, or very little; and I can very honestly declare, from the documents I have, that no positive 418 or confident opinion can be drawn from them. The Southern States are uncertain; the middle States, suspicious or decidedly wrong; and the Nothern, though, in some degree, to be calculated upon for consistency of behavior, on this occasion, are, in some respects, less stedfast than heretofore. I need not explain to you what an Essex junto, is capable of attempting, when it has any particular object in view, which is thwarted or opposed in the execution. Like the chief of the rebel angels described by Milton, it would assail the Almighty ruler of the Skies, to drag him from his throne, though sure to fall, by failing in the attempt.3 The grievances, which have alienated their affections from the chief Magistrate of the Union, so far as I have been able to trace them, are first; the appointment of Mr: Gerry to go to France; his conduct on that occasion, and the non-renunciation of him after his return. This circumstance, they say, had nearly made him Governor of Massachusetts in opposition to Mr: Strong. Secondly—The third mission to France; contrary to the wishes & opinions of all the federal party; by which the strength of the democratic party, has been encreased and the hopes of the federalists totally blasted. Thirdly, the pardon of Fries, the traitor and two others who were convicted of the like treason. Fourthly & lastly—The dissmission of the two Secretaries. I might add to the catalogue; the disbanding of the provisional army, which the junto attribute to the President, notwithstanding the law of Congress, which prescribed it. You may judge for yourself from these data, whether sufficient offence has been given to justify, personal abuse and deadly animosity against the President, from men, who have known him, in public & in private life, for thirty or forty years; who have acted with him in a variety of public capacities, and with some of whom he has been for many years in habits of friendship. Not only, have they abandoned his acquaintance but vilified his character; opposed the measures of his administration; and so far as their influence extends, exerted it to prevent his re-election to the Presidential chair. Such is the patriotic devotion of this combination of characters & personages, whose names have hitherto added weight & respectability to the cause of good government; but whose rancorous and illjudged accrimony will at this time, do singular injury to their Country.

I am vexed to hear how stupidly Mr: Treat behaved in the management of the letters &ca: committed to his care. As to the circumstance of the french Officer’s inspecting my letter, it gives me no concern; but all the other part of the charge was quite as awkwardly managed. private hands are sometimes trustworthy, but general 419 experience would most recommend public conveyances— I am glad you got the pamphlets at any rate.4 Your comments & observations upon some of them arrived here so seasonably that I took the liberty to lay them before the public, being the first communication, for many months, from your pen. Tom Cooper was released from Jail, the very day on which the extract from your letter appeared in print; several other squibs were fired off against him about the same time, which have already provoked an insulting & threatening letter from him to the Editor of the Gazette of the United States; which was delivered into his hands by one of Coopers friends, who has since attacked the Editor, in his own house, for some observations made on this occasion in his paper. The Assailant was overpowered in a little time and in his turn received a drubbing; but the business will not stop here—5 Cooper cannot live in smooth water, nor indeed do I think him entitled to go at large; he is now under a recognizance to keep the peace & be of good behaviour, and yet he has manifestly provoked this riot. I have an Office in a very convenient part of the City, but having the front room only, the house has lately been taken by one of the United Irishmen who has hitherto kept a tippling house, where the whole fraternity of renegadoes & outcasts rendezvous every day— Cooper lodges in the house— Dr Reynolds, Lloyd & others diet here, and a sett of the vilest blackguards haunt the house, that ever I beheld—6 They treat me with respect however, hitherto, and I am unwilling to forego the benefit of my station, for the sake of being out of sight and hearing of these people—

In my last letter I informed you, that I had sold your Bill upon England at 3 ⅓ per ct: above par, and advised him of my draught. I have already taken measures to invest the proceeds in 8 per cent stock although I was obliged to give 8 per ct: advance— Should my arrangements necessitate a sale some months hence, I have little doubt of obtaining the same or a better price.

I shall pay due attention to the authority given me to draw for £500 st more, by your letter of July 15th:7 I only wait a few days for a better market than the present.

If upon consultation & calculation, I should conclude to purchase an house for you, in Boston, I shall probably make a jaunt thither towards the Spring; mean time I will do the best I can with your funds.

With best love to Mrs: Adams and all my former friends at Berlin; for some of whom, I entertain much affectionate remembrance / I remain Your’s

420

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “J Q Adams Esqr:”; endorsed: “20. T. B. Adams. 12 Octr: 1800. / 14 Decr: 1800 recd: / 20 Do: Ansd:.”

1.

TBA’s letter to JQA of 28 Sept. has not been found but was forwarded to JQA by Joseph Pitcairn on 28 November. For JQA’s letters to TBA of 10 June and 15 July, see JQA to AA, 12 June, note 7, and to TBA, 16 July, note 1, respectively, both above. LCA’s letters to TBA and her family have not been found (JQA to Pitcairn, 9 Dec., OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters).

2.

For the dispute over the selection of electors in Pennsylvania, see TBA to JQA, 25 Feb., and note 8, above.

3.

Milton, Paradise Lost, Book I, lines 37–45.

4.

For the French inspection of mail being carried to JQA by Robert Treat, see JQA to TBA, 10 July, and note 1, above.

5.

Dr. Thomas Cooper was released from jail on 8 Oct., the day after the extract of JQA’s 10 July letter to TBA was printed in the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States. Articles in the same newspaper on 8 and 9 Oct. attacked Cooper, and the issue of the 11th included his responding charge that the newspaper had made him “an object of personal attack.” In accompanying commentary, editor Caleb P. Wayne said that Cooper’s letter was delivered by Dr. James Reynolds and “a Foreigner” who hinted at violence. Wayne wrote that he would not deviate from his “line of … duty” to “expose” Cooper. On the evening of the 11th, Wayne and his clerk were assaulted by attackers who broke into his house. The Philadelphia Gazette, 13 Oct., speculated whether “theft or assasination, or both were intended” and reported that the attack ended only when Wayne’s friends intervened (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 13 Oct.). For Cooper’s trial and conviction, see AA to JQA, 27 April, and note 4, above.

6.

The building at 161 Chestnut Street that housed TBA’s law office was shared with innkeeper John Cordner, who hosted gatherings of immigrant radicals. Thomas Lloyd (1756–1827) was a Philadelphia stenographer who later became Cooper’s secretary ( Philadelphia Directory , 1801, p. 90, 202, Shaw-Shoemaker, No. 1347; Jeffrey L. Pasley, “The Tyranny of Printers”: Newspaper Politics in the Early American Republic, Charlottesville, Va., 2001, p. 291; Martin I. J. Griffin, “Thomas Lloyd, Reporter to the First House of Representatives of the United States,” Records of the American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia, 3:221, 236, 238 [1888–1891]).

7.

TBA wrote to Rufus King on 29 Sept. and 21 Oct., requesting drafts on JQA’s salary of £500 each. King replied on 12 Dec., acknowledging that the drafts had been received and accepted (all NHi:Rufus King Papers).

Benjamin Rush to Abigail Adams, 13 October 1800 Rush, Benjamin Adams, Abigail
Benjamin Rush to Abigail Adams
My dear Madam. Philada Octobr 13th. 1800

By the post on the 9th instant I intruded a hasty line upon you, upon a reference Tench Coxe had made to me upon the subject of Mr Adam’s political principles.1 I wrote to Mr Coxe on the same day to demand justice from him for the injury he had done me. His publication has been contradicted as far as it relates to me in several of our papers. Tomorrow an Avowal of what I wrote to you a few days ago will appear in the Aurora with the following addition to it. “that I have uniformly heard Mr Adams say, what he has published in his works, that our present government was best calculated for our Country.”—2

I cannot express to you the distress which I continue to suffer from this cruel Act of Mr Coxe. I am consoled it is true, not only by 421 a Consciousness of my integrity towards Mr Adams, but by the universal indignation and horror which Mr Coxe’s friends as well as enemies express, in speaking of his Conduct. They both knew my tenderness for him. My connection with him began in early life. He was my groomsman when I was married, and I felt disposed to forgive his defection from his Country when a body boy, in beholding his able & successful exertions in the establishment of the general government. Since his dissmission from Office I have seldom seen him. The only hour I have passed with him for two Years, was the one from which he has taken Occasion to misapply a general declaration to him. Indeed his publication contains not a word from me upon the subject of Mr Adams’s monarchical principles. It is an artful reference only, expecting no doubt that I would be compelled if any thing had come to my knowledge to divulge it, or by my Silence give a currency to it his insinuation. My declarations have hitherto not only defeated his views, but had a contrary effect. I lament that they were necessary, for my heart sickens at the idea of taking any part in the present disputes which divide our Country. Mr Adam’s character did not require my feeble testimony in its favor.

I have called upon several of my democratic patients, and asked them to recollect whether they ever heard me utter a word, that could lead to an inference unfavorable to Mr Adam’s principles. They have not only declared they had not, but have added, that every thing I have ever said of him, was calculated to beget esteem and respect, and a Confidence in the integrity, and wisdom of his Administration. Indeed Madam since the year 1774 his name, and the independance, and happiness of the our Country have always been associated in my mind, and there is no One circumstance in my political life, that I review with half the pleasure that I do the uninterupted friendship with which he has honoured me for six & twenty years. My whole family have often heard me exult in it.

Since T Coxe’s publication I have learned, that he has harboured a secret enmity to me for not interceding with the President to restore him to his Office, or to confer some Other Office upon him. This would have been highly indelicate, for I well knew he was not dismissed on account of his democratic principles, or Opposition to Mr Adams’s election but for his disputes with Mr Wolcot.3 I am the more disposed to ascribe his publication to this cause, from having experienced similar, but more open resentment from an old School mate, whose recommendation to the President for an Office I refused to subscribe.

422

I have only to add to this long letter, that all Cobbet’s cruelties to me, were tender Mercies, compared with Tench Coxe’s.—4 Our language does not afford a word sufficiently expressive of its thier baseness.

My dear Mrs Rush who sympathizes with me in my distress, and who, better than any One else knows the Ardor and extent of my respect & Affection for Mr Adams, joins in love to you and all the family, with my dear Madam your / sincere and / Affectionate friend

Benjn: Rush

RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Dr Rush to AA / October 13th 1800.”

1.

Not found.

2.

Tench Coxe in October and November launched a series of newspaper attacks on JA, implicating unwitting accomplices such as Rush and setting himself up as a prominent critic of the Adams administration. An article by Coxe in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 9 Oct., claimed that Rush believed that JA was a monarchist. Rush wrote to Coxe on the same day, denying the allegation and demanding that Coxe retract his statement. Coxe refused, and Rush on 11 Oct. wrote a letter that was published in the Philadelphia Gazette, 14 Oct., and in the Aurora, 15 Oct., stating that JA never articulated “any other opinion upon government, than those contained in his defence of the American constitutions” and concluding, “I never heard him express a wish for a monarchy in the United States” (Jacob E. Cooke, Tench Coxe and the Early Republic, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1978, p. 382–384).

3.

A few months after Rush married Julia Stockton in Jan. 1776, Coxe fled Philadelphia for British-held New York City. He returned when the British took control of Philadelphia a year later and remained there as a merchant, barely escaping a conviction for treason in May 1778. Rush introduced Coxe to JA on 22 Jan. 1789, and Coxe served as commissioner of the revenue from 1792 until being dismissed by JA at the behest of Secretary of the Treasury Oliver Wolcott Jr. on 23 Dec. 1797. Rush told JA on 14 Aug. 1805 that he had had no contact with Coxe since this incident (vol. 12:370; Jefferson, Papers , 29:595; ANB ; Rush, Letters , 1:499, 2:903).

4.

For Rush’s dispute with William Cobbett, see AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 22 Dec. 1799, and note 4, above.