Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
No 20
r:28th:
th:October 1800.
Since the date of my last letter, I have received your
several favors of the 10th: June Dup: 15th: July Dup: 10th:
& 16th: July, with enclosures for some of
your Louisa’s family; the last of which to her brother, was accompanied by a
few lines from herself to me; for which I thank her. The enclosures have all
been forwarded, but I have not heard directly from her friends for many
weeks— I presume they are well however. I know not precisely, whether the
balance of letters between your wife & me, is for or against me, but in
either case I am willing to acknowledge myself her debtor, & to promise
a speedy discharge of the debt;—at present, I can scarcely find time to
acknowledge the receipt of your valuable & interesting
communications.1 Qur
annual elections are at hand, and all good folks are exerting their utmost,
to keep things in order, & as they should be; which is a very difficult
and laborious task. The darling priviledge of Election, is so constantly
recurring in this Country, that the people are kept in a continual political
ferment, and from every repetition of the exercise, they become more
bewitched and infatuated with it. The 14th:
currt: is the day for chusing members of
Congress & of the State Legislature here; Electors for President will
not be chosen, on account of the disagreement of the last Legislature upon
the mode of election; so that Pennsylvania will probably have no vote in the
College of Elector’s.2 We are
so completely democratised, that I have no confidence in the success of any
men or measures, which are advocated by the friends to the federal
Government.
You may possibly be ready to suppose, that a pretty
correct judgment might, at this moment, be formed, as to the probable result
of the ensuing election, for chief Magistrate of the Union. I have as much
information upon this subject, perhaps, as can be collected from the public
prints; private, I have none, or very little; and I can very honestly
declare, from the documents I have, that no positive 418 or confident opinion can be drawn
from them. The Southern States are uncertain; the middle States, suspicious
or decidedly wrong; and the Nothern, though, in
some degree, to be calculated upon for consistency of behavior, on this
occasion, are, in some respects, less stedfast than heretofore. I need not
explain to you what an Essex junto, is capable of attempting, when it has
any particular object in view, which is thwarted or opposed in the
execution. Like the chief of the rebel angels described by Milton, it would
assail the Almighty ruler of the Skies, to drag him from his throne, though
sure to fall, by failing in the attempt.3 The grievances, which have
alienated their affections from the chief Magistrate of the Union, so far as
I have been able to trace them, are first; the appointment of Mr: Gerry to go to France; his conduct on that
occasion, and the non-renunciation of him after his return. This
circumstance, they say, had nearly made him Governor of Massachusetts in
opposition to Mr: Strong. Secondly—The third
mission to France; contrary to the wishes & opinions of all the federal
party; by which the strength of the democratic party, has been encreased and
the hopes of the federalists totally blasted. Thirdly, the pardon of Fries,
the traitor and two others who were convicted of the like treason. Fourthly
& lastly—The dissmission of the two Secretaries. I might add to the
catalogue; the disbanding of the provisional army, which the junto attribute
to the President, notwithstanding the law of Congress, which prescribed it.
You may judge for yourself from these data, whether sufficient offence has
been given to justify, personal abuse and deadly animosity against the
President, from men, who have known him, in public & in private life,
for thirty or forty years; who have acted with him in a variety of public
capacities, and with some of whom he has been for many years in habits of
friendship. Not only, have they abandoned his acquaintance but vilified his
character; opposed the measures of his administration; and so far as their
influence extends, exerted it to prevent his re-election to the Presidential
chair. Such is the patriotic devotion of this combination of characters
& personages, whose names have hitherto added weight &
respectability to the cause of good government; but whose rancorous and
illjudged accrimony will at this time, do singular injury to their
Country.
I am vexed to hear how stupidly Mr: Treat behaved in the management of the letters &ca: committed to his care. As to the
circumstance of the french Officer’s inspecting my letter, it gives me no
concern; but all the other part of the charge was quite as awkwardly
managed. private hands are sometimes trustworthy, but general 419 experience would most recommend
public conveyances— I am glad you got the pamphlets at any rate.4 Your comments & observations
upon some of them arrived here so seasonably that I took the liberty to lay
them before the public, being the first communication, for many months, from
your pen. Tom Cooper was released from Jail, the very day on which the
extract from your letter appeared in print; several other squibs were fired
off against him about the same time, which have already provoked an
insulting & threatening letter from him to the Editor of the Gazette of
the United States; which was delivered into his hands by one of Coopers
friends, who has since attacked the Editor, in his own house, for some
observations made on this occasion in his paper. The Assailant was
overpowered in a little time and in his turn received a drubbing; but the
business will not stop here—5
Cooper cannot live in smooth water, nor indeed do I think him entitled to go
at large; he is now under a recognizance to keep the peace & be of good
behaviour, and yet he has manifestly provoked this riot. I have an Office in
a very convenient part of the City, but having the front room only, the
house has lately been taken by one of the United Irishmen who has hitherto
kept a tippling house, where the whole fraternity of renegadoes &
outcasts rendezvous every day— Cooper lodges in the house— Dr Reynolds, Lloyd & others diet here, and a
sett of the vilest blackguards haunt the house, that ever I beheld—6 They treat me with respect
however, hitherto, and I am unwilling to forego the benefit of my station,
for the sake of being out of sight and hearing of these people—
In my last letter I informed you, that I had sold your
Bill upon England at 3 ⅓ per ct: above par, and
advised him of my draught. I have already taken measures to invest the
proceeds in 8 per cent stock although I was obliged to give 8 per ct: advance— Should my arrangements necessitate a
sale some months hence, I have little doubt of obtaining the same or a
better price.
I shall pay due attention to the authority given me to
draw for £500 st more, by your letter of July
15th:—7 I only wait a few days for a
better market than the present.
If upon consultation & calculation, I should conclude to purchase an house for you, in Boston, I shall probably make a jaunt thither towards the Spring; mean time I will do the best I can with your funds.
With best love to Mrs: Adams
and all my former friends at Berlin; for some
of whom, I entertain much affectionate remembrance / I remain Your’s
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “J
Q Adams Esqr:”; endorsed: “20. T. B. Adams.
12 Octr: 1800. / 14 Decr: 1800 recd: /
20 Do: Ansd:.”
TBA’s letter to JQA of 28 Sept. has not been found but was forwarded to JQA by Joseph Pitcairn on 28 November. For JQA’s letters to TBA of 10 June and 15 July, see JQA to AA, 12 June, note 7, and to TBA, 16 July, note 1, respectively, both above. LCA’s letters to TBA and her family have not been found (JQA to Pitcairn, 9 Dec., OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters).
For the dispute over the selection of electors in Pennsylvania, see TBA to JQA, 25 Feb., and note 8, above.
Milton, Paradise Lost,
Book I, lines 37–45.
For the French inspection of mail being carried to JQA by Robert Treat, see JQA to TBA, 10 July, and note 1, above.
Dr. Thomas Cooper was released from jail on 8 Oct.,
the day after the extract of JQA’s 10 July letter to
TBA was printed in the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States. Articles in
the same newspaper on 8 and 9 Oct. attacked Cooper, and the issue of the
11th included his responding charge that the newspaper had made him “an
object of personal attack.” In accompanying commentary, editor Caleb P.
Wayne said that Cooper’s letter was delivered by Dr. James Reynolds and
“a Foreigner” who hinted at violence. Wayne
wrote that he would not deviate from his “line of … duty” to “expose”
Cooper. On the evening of the 11th, Wayne and his clerk were assaulted
by attackers who broke into his house. The Philadelphia Gazette, 13 Oct., speculated whether “theft or assasination, or both were intended” and reported that the
attack ended only when Wayne’s friends intervened (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 13 Oct.). For
Cooper’s trial and conviction, see
AA to JQA, 27
April, and note 4, above.
The building at 161 Chestnut Street that housed
TBA’s law office was shared with innkeeper John
Cordner, who hosted gatherings of immigrant radicals. Thomas Lloyd
(1756–1827) was a Philadelphia stenographer who later became Cooper’s
secretary (
Philadelphia Directory
, 1801, p.
90, 202, Shaw-Shoemaker, No. 1347; Jeffrey L. Pasley, “The Tyranny of Printers”: Newspaper Politics in
the Early American Republic, Charlottesville, Va., 2001, p.
291; Martin I. J. Griffin, “Thomas Lloyd, Reporter to the First House of
Representatives of the United States,” Records
of the American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia,
3:221, 236, 238 [1888–1891]).
TBA wrote to Rufus King on 29 Sept. and 21 Oct., requesting drafts on JQA’s salary of £500 each. King replied on 12 Dec., acknowledging that the drafts had been received and accepted (all NHi:Rufus King Papers).
a
r13th. 1800
By the post on the 9th
instant I intruded a hasty line upon you, upon a reference Tench Coxe had
made to me upon the subject of Mr Adam’s
political principles.1 I
wrote to Mr Coxe on the same day to demand
justice from him for the injury he had done me. His publication has been
contradicted as far as it relates to me in several of our papers. Tomorrow
an Avowal of what I wrote to you a few days ago will appear in the Aurora
with the following addition to it. “that I have uniformly heard Mr Adams say, what he has published in his works,
that our present government was best calculated for our Country.”—2
I cannot express to you the distress which I continue to
suffer from this cruel Act of Mr Coxe. I am
consoled it is true, not only by 421 a
Consciousness of my integrity towards Mr Adams,
but by the universal indignation and horror which Mr Coxe’s friends as well as enemies
express, in speaking of his Conduct. They both knew my tenderness for him.
My connection with him began in early life. He was my groomsman when I was
married, and I felt disposed to forgive his defection from his Country when
a body boy, in beholding his able &
successful exertions in the establishment of the general government. Since
his dissmission from Office I have seldom seen him. The only hour I have
passed with him for two Years, was the one from which he has taken Occasion
to misapply a general declaration to him. Indeed his publication contains
not a word from me upon the subject of Mr
Adams’s monarchical principles. It is an artful
reference only, expecting no doubt that I would be compelled if any
thing had come to my knowledge to divulge it, or by my Silence give a
currency to it his insinuation. My
declarations have hitherto not only defeated his views, but had a contrary
effect. I lament that they were necessary, for my heart sickens at the idea
of taking any part in the present disputes which divide our Country. Mr Adam’s character did not require my feeble
testimony in its favor.
I have called upon several of my democratic patients, and
asked them to recollect whether they ever heard me utter a word, that could
lead to an inference unfavorable to Mr Adam’s
principles. They have not only declared they had not, but have added, that
every thing I have ever said of him, was calculated to beget esteem and
respect, and a Confidence in the integrity, and wisdom of his
Administration. Indeed Madam since the year 1774 his name, and the
independance, and happiness of the our
Country have always been associated in my mind, and there is no One
circumstance in my political life, that I review with half the pleasure that
I do the uninterupted friendship with which he has honoured me for six &
twenty years. My whole family have often heard me exult in it.
Since T Coxe’s publication I have learned, that he has
harboured a secret enmity to me for not interceding with the President to
restore him to his Office, or to confer some Other Office upon him. This
would have been highly indelicate, for I well knew he was not dismissed on
account of his democratic principles, or Opposition to Mr Adams’s election but for his disputes with
Mr Wolcot.3 I am the more disposed to ascribe
his publication to this cause, from having experienced similar, but more
open resentment from an old School mate, whose recommendation to the
President for an Office I refused to subscribe.
I have only to add to this long letter, that all Cobbet’s
cruelties to me, were tender Mercies, compared with Tench Coxe’s.—4 Our language does not afford a
word sufficiently expressive of its
thier baseness.
My dear Mrs Rush who
sympathizes with me in my distress, and who, better than any One else knows
the Ardor and extent of my respect & Affection for Mr Adams, joins in love to you and all the
family, with my dear Madam your / sincere and / Affectionate friend
n:Rush
RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Dr Rush
to AA / October 13th 1800.”
Not found.
Tench Coxe in October and November launched a series
of newspaper attacks on JA, implicating unwitting
accomplices such as Rush and setting himself up as a prominent critic of
the Adams administration. An article by Coxe in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 9 Oct., claimed
that Rush believed that JA was a monarchist. Rush wrote to
Coxe on the same day, denying the allegation and demanding that Coxe
retract his statement. Coxe refused, and Rush on 11 Oct. wrote a letter
that was published in the Philadelphia
Gazette, 14 Oct., and in the Aurora, 15 Oct., stating that JA never
articulated “any other opinion upon government, than those contained in
his defence of the American constitutions” and concluding, “I never
heard him express a wish for a monarchy in the United States” (Jacob E.
Cooke, Tench Coxe and the Early Republic,
Chapel Hill, N.C., 1978, p. 382–384).
A few months after Rush married Julia Stockton in
Jan. 1776, Coxe fled Philadelphia for British-held New York City. He
returned when the British took control of Philadelphia a year later and
remained there as a merchant, barely escaping a conviction for treason
in May 1778. Rush introduced Coxe to JA on 22 Jan. 1789,
and Coxe served as commissioner of the revenue from 1792 until being
dismissed by JA at the behest of Secretary of the Treasury
Oliver Wolcott Jr. on 23 Dec. 1797. Rush told JA on 14 Aug.
1805 that he had had no contact with Coxe since this incident (vol. 12:370; Jefferson, Papers
, 29:595;
ANB
; Rush, Letters
, 1:499,
2:903).
For Rush’s dispute with William Cobbett, see AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 22 Dec. 1799, and note 4, above.