Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

Abigail Adams to John Quincy Adams, 27 May 1798 Adams, Abigail Adams, John Quincy
Abigail Adams to John Quincy Adams
my dear son sunday Philadelphia May 27th 1798

As the vessel by which I have already written to you, did not sail yesterday, I can now inform you that the Bill for the protection of our commerce past yesterday in the House of Rep’s 50 to 40—1 it impowers our vessels of war to capture, and bring in all French cruizers and Privateers which shall be found hovering upon our Coast.— it will pass into a Law tomorrow.

We are still in the dark why our Envoys remain in Paris— we have reason to believe that they were there as late as the 8th of April, tho the Government is without any dispatches of later date than those, which I have Sent you by this opportunity

I inclose the latest paper to you. Mr dayton the speeker of the House of Rep’s, has been through the whole of this session as firm & steady as a Rock. This state appears to have had an astonishing Change of sentiment. it is in the City, more united in sentiment than Nyork2

The Levingstone aristocracy dominers there, tho according to there Education, and there means of dissipation & allurements they are apt scholors of the Orlean Faction. an insatiable Ambition devours the Chancellor. To see mr Jay stand higher in the publick estimation, and Elected Chief over him; fills him with the same sensations, which Milton puts into the mouth of the Arch fiend. “Better 59 to Reign in hell, than serve in Heaven.”3 If you wish to order your Books to America, and think it safe, I will find a shelter for them. most affectionatly Your / Mother

A Adams—

Ps To mrs Adams Love & to Thomas—

RC (Adams Papers).

1.

AA had written to JQA the previous day, noting the continuing flood of addresses in support of the president and government as well as the ongoing attempts in the House of Representatives to block defensive measures. She also recommended that JQA read John Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe. She wrote again to JQA on 29 May reporting the success of convoys in protecting American vessels (both Adams Papers). Her letters of 26, 27, and 29 May were likely all carried by the brig Peter, Capt. Hansen, which sailed from Philadelphia on the 29th and arrived in Hamburg on 7 July (Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser, 29 May; Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 5 Oct.). For the law authorizing the protection of American commerce and U.S. coasts, see AA to Cotton Tufts, 25 May, and note 2, above.

2.

The enclosure has not been found but was likely the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 26 May, reporting on the 10 May debates over the provisional army during which Jonathan Dayton gave a lengthy defense of the bill. He argued the opposition was promoting “Weakness and Submission” as a new American motto and dishonoring the legacy of the Revolutionary War. Dayton called on other members “to make their stand” and to defend the bill “inch by inch.” The newspaper also printed two articles condemning Albert Gallatin for his opposition to the administration and published a number of supportive addresses to JA.

3.

Milton, Paradise Lost, Book 1, line 263.

Francis Dana to Abigail Adams, 27 May 1798 Dana, Francis Adams, Abigail
Francis Dana to Abigail Adams
Madam Cambridge May 27th. 1798.

In my letter of the 27th. of last Decr: I took the liberty thrô you to recommend my friend Major John Hobby of Portland to some appointment in the stamp department of the revenue but I find that business has been annexed to an existing office. I have now to solicit for him one which probably will take place soon, I mean that of a purchasing & issuing commissary for the troops which are to be stationed at Portland & elsewhere in the District of Maine.1

I shall enclose you a recommendatory letter from Genl: Knox to the Secretary at War, with whom I have no acquaintance to my knowledge, which I pray you to send to him. Of the character of the Officer mentioned in it nothing need to be added by me: but it is proper to say Genl: Knox has misconceived his wishes in supposing him to be desirous of an appointment of a Field Officer of Infantry with a prospect of promotion. This he does not incline to accept, being during our revolutionary war constantly employed in the Artillery Corps, and in the Laboratory; with which he feels himself well 60 acquainted. He supposed a body of Artillerists wou’d be stationed, principally in Boston, under the command of a Majr: or Lt: Colo: Commandant, whose command wou’d be extended over the posts in the other sea-ports of this State, or at least the neighbouring ones. This was the appointment he wished to obtain, or if such an one shou’d not be made, but a Laboratory shou’d be established there, or in the vicinity, or a commissorial department for purchasing & issuing for the troops stationed for the defence of our Sea Coast, an appointment in either of these departments, thô he wou’d prefer the first, he wou’d willingly accept of— Madam, I will not again trouble you with applications of this nature, they being exceedingly disagreable to my disposition: but I shall positively decline ever making one, for any friend who shall apply for such purpose.

Suffer me to suggest to you, one matter not of the least consequence to the public interest. I mean that of displacing forthwith every officer of the United States, who in this crisis of affairs, shall refuse to come forward in support of our national Government. I have a particular reference to some in Portsmouth, whose dismission, I may venture to say, is in a sort demanded by the public voice, and whose continuance in office has become exceedingly disagreable to the firm friends of our Country. Their names & offices have been published in our Newspapers, otherwise I shou’d not have been particular in my suggestion.—2 I view our public affairs in too serious a light to admit of an indecisive line of conduct in our Administration. They will now find their measures supported almost universally. This therefore is the moment for Action, as well as Deliberation, and if not improved may be the cause of discouragement of the present active friends of Government. In my opinion, it is impossible to stand on better ground. I know who does not want the disposition to do all that is necessary or expedient for freeing our Country from foreign influence & a vile domestic faction more hateful because more wicked than all our foreign enemies, if possible.

I am with the greatest respect / Madam your obedt. hbl: Servant

FRA DANA

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Madam Adams”; internal address: “Madam Adams”; endorsed: “Judge Dana 27th / May 1798.”

1.

Dana’s letter requesting patronage for Capt. John Hobby has not been found. Hobby (ca. 1750–1802), who had served as the federal marshal for the district of Maine since 1793, was reappointed to the post in Jan. 1798 but did not receive any further nominations from JA. He continued as marshal until March 1799 but was later imprisoned for retaining monies belonging to the United States while holding the position 61 (Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 12:195–196; Jefferson, Papers , 33:375–377).

2.

On 15 May 1798 Josiah Parker of Virginia asked the House of Representatives to consider a declaration by Capt. Bernard Magnien and Lt. John Brookes and their corps of grenadiers at Portsmouth, Va. The declaration stated that the signers “view with extreme concern the attempts that are evidently making by men high in authority, to widen the breach between the United States and the French Republic.” While they pledged to fight if the country was invaded, they lamented that the nation’s highest officials “strive to involve us all in the calamities of a war with the most powerful Republic on earth.” After an extended debate, which centered on whether the address was meant as a slight to JA, the House voted 46 to 43 to refer the matter to the Committee of the Whole. The address was printed in the Boston Independent Chronicle, 21–24 May ( Annals of Congress , 5th Cong., 2d sess., p. 1707–1724).