Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
d:August 1799
I received your agreeable birth day tribute the day following the date of my last; since then the deadly pestilence has burst forth again with ten fold violence & every part of the City is more or less infected.1 The inhabitants are flying in every direction & not a room 543 is left unoccupied at Germantown. I go there but seldom. The Banks & other public Offices are soon expected. New York, we understand, is equally afflicted & alarmed. Another mournful Autumn menaces on all sides, & yet the weather seems favorable to an high degree of health in the Country. I shall not expose myself to fever infection, so, be of no concern for me;2
I had heard nothing of the pamphlet you mention, but am desirous of seeing it, wicked & abandoned as it is— Barloe is deep in the mysteries of modern philosophy— He is not only a deliberate plodding villain, but of slender intellect— His mind was never capable of a manly thought on subjects of government— Poets in general are the worst of politicians— they are by trade & occupation worshipers of ideal images, dealers in fiction, builders of air born castles & master workmen only in the edifices of Parnassus’ sumit. These things belong not in any manner to the Science of Government. In France indeed, under the mockery of Republicanism, the Chénier’s the Beaumarchais’s have prostituted their muses to the vile purpose of blasphemy & Atheism—3 In Republican france, Poets may be legislators, for the Republic originated in fraud, has been maintained by violence & yet exists only in imagination. All these things appertain to Poetry. Ergo a poetical form of Government is the most arbitrary, absurd & monstrous that ever prevailed among mankind. Who but a frenchman would have endured a rhyming race of governors & legislators?
The above is about on a level with the reasoning of Tom Paine in “Age of Reason part 2d:”
wherein he levels aims all the shafts of his
railery & gibes at the Bible— He dwells much on a conceit which he thinks original,
in both parts of this work, viz— That prophet, originally meant nothing more nor less
than poet, and that the prophesies are only poems in the Eastern style, which deals much
in allegory fable & parable, so that to sanctify these poems by calling them
prophesies & respecting them as authentic traditions of the word of God; is solemn
mockery.4 Well, I have proved that the
french nation have in latter days pay’d more respect than any other to these sort of
folks called poets, by admiting them to give laws to their Country, & therefore
france is incontestably more culpable in retaining a reverence for impostors than all
the world besides.
I hope Dr: Hopkins is not ranked among
the fraternity, though he is rather a visionary than otherwise in some of his opinions.
His professional reputation at Hartford is very good.5
I got a letter from JQA. dated 29 April, a day or two since— It was
544 brought by a vessel that was carried in &
detained a month in England, but was finally liberated, being freighted with a cargo for
Government.
6 The subject of this letter is business merely, on the details of which I shall write
shortly to my Mother— I have no letter from her later than the 4th: currt:.
Truxton insinuates that he has been coaxed to go out after another
Monsieur friggate— I dont believe this would have been done if the S of N— had felt
himself unconscious of promising more than he had a right to do on the subject of rank.
He is resolved to persist in his resignation. He has a right so to do, but he is
preparing chagrin discontent & torment for himself during his life, by the obstinate
exercise of it. Discipline must be established at the outset, for the vices & errors
of infancy are hard to correct in maturer age. Our Navy is the most hopeful &
promising of our Country’s offspring & I hope it will be trained up in the nurture
of due subordination to its parent authority. A really good & valua[ble o]fficer or
servant, is he that unites courage, capacity, humanity & humility, but how rare is the association complete! I wish Truxton well, but
older & abler must not be overlooked, however they may have been eclipsed by a
fortunate & well timed adventure.
Dear William you write a very slovenly hand and you spell shockingly ill— Truth is sometimes disagreeable, but ought not therefore to be disguised— She is, you know, the only female that wants no fig leaf to cover her nakedness.
I am dear William sincerely / Your’s
PS. If the Post Office does not remove it will be difficult to get letters very soon from town or to it—you must make due allowance therefore for irregularity.
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “W S Shaw / Quincy”; internal address:
“W S Shaw”; endorsed: “Germantown 23 Aug / T B Adams / rec 30th / Ansd 6th Sept”;
docketed: “1799 Aug / 23.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
Shaw’s letter to TBA has not been found.
After sporadic reports of yellow fever in Philadelphia and New
York City in early summer, the Philadelphia American Daily
Advertiser, 23 Aug., reported that fever was widespread in the city and printed
a letter from New York that said cases there had prompted an exodus to the country. By
the time the epidemic was over in late October, 1,000 had died in Philadelphia and 76
in New York (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 5
July; New-York Gazette, 2 Aug.; New York Mercantile Advertiser, 25 Oct.; Albert H. Buck and Thomas
L. Stedman, eds., A Reference Handbook of the Medical
Sciences, rev. edn., 9 vols., N.Y., 1900–1908, 9:719).
Marie Joseph de Chénier (1764–1811), who served on the Council of
Five Hundred, embraced the perception that his tragedy Charles
IX and other works helped inspire the French Revolution. Pierre Augustin Caron
de Beaumarchais’ Le mariage de Figaro, for which see vol.
6:52–53, 224, was interpreted by French revolutionaries
as a call for 545 radical change, though Beaumarchais was a
moderate who narrowly escaped execution. He died on 19 May (Hoefer, Nouv. biog.
générale
).
Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason: Being an
Investigation of True and of Fabulous Theology, Part II, Paris, 1796, was a
continuation of the deist philosophy espoused by Paine in the first part of the work,
for which see vol. 10:229,
230.
Dr. Lemuel Hopkins as one of the Connecticut Wits was accused of
advocating an unorthodox religious philosophy before positioning himself as a firm
Calvinist. He specialized in the treatment of tuberculosis in his Hartford medical
practice (
DAB
).
The ship Prosper, Capt. Williams,
was bound for New York from Hamburg with German muskets purchased by the United States
when it was detained on 7 May by the British frigate Latona. After a month in Yarmouth, England, the vessel was cleared by the
Board of Admiralty and sailed on 15 June, arriving in New York on 20 Aug. (Philadelphia Gazette, 20, 21 Aug.). For Joseph Pitcairn’s
role in the purchase of the muskets, see TBA to Pitcairn, 17 Sept. 1798, and note 3,
above.
th:August 1799
I have no letter from you later than the 4th: which I mention only because the interval is a little longer than usual
between your communications and lest any you might have written may have miscarried.
From William I got a packet on Saturday, after my letter of that day was sent to town,
otherwise, I should have acknowledged its receipt.1 In J Russells paper of the 15th: which he enclosed me, I perceive a very handsome letter
addressed to Peter Porcupine by a New England man, on the
subject of expunging from the new edition of his works which he proposes to publish by
subscription, the illiberal, accrimon[ious] & unprovoked attack upon the character
of Joseph Priestly. I co[ncur] so fully in the sentiments of this writer on that
subject, that I hope [. . .] may take the whim of inserting the letter with his
“Observations on the Emigration” &ca: if he will not
adopt the advice of the writer in the other particular, which there is little reason to
think he will. Can you guess who the New Englandman is?2
I have received the letter on the subject of my brother’s affairs,
which he refers to in his last to you.3
It is very explicit & intelligible as a letter of instructions and I have the
satisfaction of having anticipated compliance with a great part of the injunctions. His
letter is dated April 29th: at which time he had received
only my two first numbers, which contained little of the detail of my transactions in
his affairs; my two next letters were filled with little else. From one of your letters
he had collected information, which detected a considerable error in the account
rendered by his Boston Agent in July 1798, in which the instalments on the shares in the
Middlesex Canal are charged to my brother as paid; that is,
the 30th: instalment fell 546 due 18th: July and is charged—no payment was made subsequent to that
and the time of his delivering up the papers, but instead of two hundred dollars only
one hundred could have been due for four month’s assessments on five shares, of course
payments for four months prior to July must have ceased and yet they were charged as
paid— How to repair this mistake would puzzle wiser heads than mine, unless the
extremity of the law were put in force.
The Minister say’s to me, “You will never think yourself entitled to betray my confidence, because I am your brother, or to ruin me, because I cannot take the law of you.” Such an insinuation would have hurt my feelings, had I been less acquainted with his character or my own— But he has had ample occasion to speak plain to those whom he entrusts with his affairs.
The fever prevails in the City to an awful degree, considering the earliness of the season—the mortality is equal to the same period of the last year. Our house is full of fugitives, but we are entirely free from danger.
I have recently become acquainted in the family of Mr: Hare, who has a pretty seat in this neighborhood. I dined
there last week and was much gratified with the conversation of the elder & younger
branches of the family. Mr: Hare told me that I reminded him
of my Father as he was more than 20 years ago, when he lodged in the same house with him
at Mrs: Yards in Philadelphia— “I
recollect your father wore his hair then much as yours is now.” Did he, indeed
Sir, said I, the information is very acceptable to me and shall not be lost, for I have
been somewhat persecuted since my return on account of the cut of my hair. Young Mr: Hare observed, he supposed because it was democratic.4 Mrs: Powell whom I saw last evening
desired me to present her best congratulations on the reestablishment of your health—
The widow looks as youthful & blooming almost as her niece Miss Hare.5 The gift of tongue
seems to pervade every branch of this family.
Present me kindly to my Father for whom the annecdote of the crop is particularly related & to whom you will
please to read it / for your Son
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs: A Adams / Quincy”; internal address: “Mrs: A Adams”; endorsed: “T B Adams / August 26 / 1799.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
Not found.
William Cobbett had attacked Joseph Priestley for his French
sympathies beginning with the publication of Observations on
the Emigration of Dr. Joseph Priestly, Phila. and N.Y., 1794, Evans, No. 26778, and continuing
547 in the pages of Porcupine’s Political Censor, for Jan. 1797, for which see vol. 12:49, 50. More recent attacks appeared in the
Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 5, 15 Jan., 13 March,
12 August. The Boston Russell’s Gazette, 15 Aug.,
featured a piece by “A New-England Man” comparing the attacks to “a wren pecking at an eagle” and
calling on Cobbett to either leave them out of his upcoming collected works or to
print the letter alongside them. Although AA disputed the information in
her 4 Sept. reply to TBA,
below, an article in Porcupine’s Gazette, 26 Aug.,
identified “A New-England Man” as John Gardner. Cobbett included “Observations on
Priestley’s Emigration” and other attacks in his Porcupine’s
Works, 12 vols., London, 1801, 1:151–215.
JQA to AA, 7 May, above.
The trend toward short natural hair that gained popularity in the
1790s and was hastened in England by a 1795 tax on powder extended to the United
States, where it was often interpreted as a political statement promoting republican
ideals (vol. 9:294; Victoria
Sherrow, Encyclopedia of Hair: A Cultural History,
Westport, Conn., 2006, p. 322, 404–405). For JA’s inconsistent use of
wigs, see vols. 9:293; 11:138, 139.
On 18 Aug. 1799 TBA recorded in his Diary that he
had had a “very sociable time” after “Charles Hare called
& invited me to dine at his father’s in a family party.” Charles Willing Hare
(1778–1827) was the eldest surviving child of Margaret Willing and Robert Hare Sr.,
for whom see JA, Papers
, 4:499. The current speaker of the Penn. senate, Hare Sr. had
resided in the boardinghouse of Sarah Yard at the same time as JA in the
mid-1770s. His only daughter was Martha (1779–1852). For Elizabeth Willing Powel, the
sister of Margaret Willing Hare, see vol. 9:168 (TBA, Diary, 1798–1799; Washington, Papers, Presidential
Series
, 10:626; JA,
D&A
, 2:115; Charles P. Keith, The Provincial
Councillors of Pennsylvania, Phila., 1883, p. 89–90, 129).
TBA wrote AA a second letter on 26 Aug. after receiving her letter of 17 Aug., above. In it he confirmed that Col. Thomas Hartley had become a supporter of Thomas McKean, downplayed Joel Barlow’s political influence, and reported the 11 Aug. birth of John Stephens Smith, son of WSS’s sister Elizabeth and her husband, John Smith (Adams Papers).