Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
st:May 1799.
Your friendly & excellent letters of the 1st: & 10 instt: have reached
me at this place, where I arrived the night before last, having passed a few days at
Baltimore & Annapolis on my way.1 My
tour has hitherto been highly pleasing to me, and should it conclude as it began, I
shall not regret having made it; indeed a more favorable moment could not have occurred,
since had I remained in Philada: my time would not have been
effectively employed, for want of an Office & a boarding place, which could not be
had to my fancy until the beginning of next month. Should you be anxious to know in what
street my dwelling is to be, I have no objection to your being informed, that the Bishop
is one of my neighbors and that I hope to see the ladies of that family the oftener on
this account.2
I am not in the humor to write you a “long excellent letter” at this time, for several reasons, which shall not here be given, nor do I promise to write you such a letter at any future period, & yet I may write you many letters.
The City of Washington, if I were in a descriptive mood, would
furnish a most captivating picture— “Cities shall grow where forrests late have stood,”
which might be parraphrazed thus—A City growing in the Midst of wood. What admiration
must it not excite on reading of the stately Capitol, the
magnificent Presidential palace, the 472 commodious Blodget
Hotel, placed equi-distant from each other, though scarcely visible by reason of that
distance—3 Here, in the language of
Geographers, is a fine champain Country, well stored with wood, abounding in various
sorts of game; a majestic river, navigable, full of fish & wild fowl; & other
natural advantages too numerous to be enumerated.
The situation of the ground on which the City is to stand is very pleasant, from different positions you are presented with very fine prospects uniting landscape with water scenes, and from almost every point a view of Alexandria mingles with & diversifies the whole.— The Capitol is in very considerable forwardness; I mean one wing of the building, and might be finished in a few months; The Presidents house is not quite so forward; and as to the rest, they are yet on the ground.
During my stay at Annapolis I received great attention &
hospitality from the first characters of the place and had an opportunity of making the
acquaintance of several gentlemen of the Bar & Bench, among the former Mr: Winchester, Mr: Luther Martin
& a Mr: Hollingsworth—all of Baltimore; Mr: Key of Annapolis & Mr: J. T
Mason of Georgetown, brother to S.T.M. of memory.4
I ought to have mentioned the family of Governor Ogle & that of
Charles Carroll of Carrollton from whom I received distinguished marks of politeness.
Madam Ogle gave a Ball, which I am almost ashamed to say, was entirely a compliment to
me.5 What a fine thing it is to have
a father when his merits are thus visited on the
child.
I intend to visit the General at the Mount on Thursday, accompanied
by Mr: & Mrs: Johnson, who
have been very kind & studious to accommodate me in every thing within their power.
Mr: Tom Johnson has resided for some time at Annapolis for
the benefit of his health and has recovered surprizingly; he enquired very kindly after
you.
Mr: Cranch is well; better I think
since I have been here—we got him into company at Annapolis & revived his spirits
wonderfully; Mrs: C— is yet confined to her chamber, though
doing very well—6
Present me kindly to my father & mother, to Louisa &
Boylston I had forgotten to notice the triumph in town meeting warfare— B——n’s remark
was in character. Poor Benj y
,
how frail we are! I do suppose the whole connection will now be ready to desert the
Government & abandon it to its fate, as Rats will a ship, just before she sinks.7
I shall write soon to my Mother, whom I now thank for her favor of
the 10th:.8
The newspapers are acceptable.
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “William S. Shaw / Quincy”; internal
address: “W. S Shaw.”; endorsed: “Washington City / 21st
May / T B Adams. / Ans 7th June.”; docketed: “1799 / May
21.”
Not found.
Episcopal bishop William White and his daughters, Elizabeth
(1776–1831) and Mary (1777–1826), lived at 89 Walnut Street (Emma Siggins White,
comp., Genesis of the White Family, Kansas City, Mo.,
1920, p. 139–140;
Philadelphia Directory
, 1799, p. 148, Evans, No. 36353).
Blodget’s Hotel was designed in Palladian style by James Hoban on
a commission from Samuel Blodget Jr. In 1793 and 1794 Blodget attempted to use the
property as a lottery prize, but the venture failed. It was never used as a hotel, and
in 1800 it became a theater (Margaret Burri, “A New View of Blodget’s Hotel,” Washington History 2:103 [Spring 1990]; Washington, Papers, Presidential Series
, 14:593–594, 602; 15:109–110).
James Winchester (1772–1806) was a Baltimore lawyer whom
JA commissioned to the U.S. District Court of Maryland during the
congressional recess and who was appointed to the position on 10 Dec. 1799. Zebulon
Hollingsworth (ca. 1762–1824) had been appointed U.S. attorney for the district of
Maryland on 21 Nov. 1792. Philip Barton Key (1757–1815) was a lawyer who served in the
Md. House of Delegates between 1794 and 1799; on 25 Feb. 1801 JA
nominated him to the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court. John Thomson Mason (1765–1824) was the
younger brother of Stevens Thomson Mason and a prominent lawyer in Maryland and
Washington, D.C. (vol. 12:535;
Doc.
Hist. Supreme Court
, 1:220; U.S. Senate, Exec.
Jour.
, 2d Cong., 2d sess., p. 125, 126; 6th Cong., 1st sess., p. 325,
327; Madison, Papers, Secretary of State Series
, 7:645;
Biog. Dir.
Cong.
; Jefferson,
Papers
, 33:380). For Luther Martin, see William Cranch to AA, 8 May 1798,
and note 4, above.
On 16 May 1799 TBA dined with Gov. Benjamin and Henrietta Margaret Hill Ogle at Jennings House and went to the theater. The following day he dined at the estate of Charles Carroll of Carrollton and then attended a ball hosted by Governor Ogle (TBA, Diary, 1798–1799).
Anna (Nancy) Greenleaf Cranch gave birth to Anne Allen Cranch (d.
1822) on 28 April (Greenleaf, Greenleaf Family
, p. 222).
On 11 March nine people were elected as Boston selectmen. The Massachusetts Mercury, 12 March, reported the results as
“another instance of the popularity of Federalism” because after the vote the service
of several outgoing selectmen was acknowledged with the exception of Benjamin Austin
Jr., causing him to call for “an investigation of his conduct as a Selectman.” A “vote of thanks” was then offered but passed only “after a struggle” (Boston Independent
Chronicle, 11–14 March).
Not found.
TBA wrote again to Shaw on 8 June, summarizing his recent travels, including his visit to Mount Vernon. Comparing the estate with Peacefield, TBA reported that he told George Washington, “If the President were to see Mount Vernon, he would be quite ashamed of his own place,” to which Washington only “smiled” (MWA:Adams Family Letters).
d1799
I have received your letter of the 16th
& the bundle of papers inclosed with a great deal of pain. The thing has not a good
appearance. Mr. Shieflin had better have addressed his letter & papers to 474 me than to you who are not the Secretary of War.
You are suspected & have been accused of improper speculations in the neighborhood
of Detroit & in connection with characters whose friendship does you no honor. These
Indian pretensions are suspected to have been excited by you and your associates.1
I send you back all the papers. If you will take upon yourself to send them to the Secretary at War, you may, I will not. If you desire the command of Detroit you must sollicit it of the Secretary at War, the commander in chief of the army or Major Gen. Hamilton. I will not interfere with the discipline & order of the army because you are my son in law
I am with usual affection yours.
LbC in William Smith Shaw’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Col Smith.”; APM Reel 119.
In his letter to JA of 16 May (Adams Papers), WSS enclosed a packet
of documents relating to JA’s Dec. 1798 meetings with representatives of
several Native American tribes, for which see William Smith Shaw to AA, 20 Dec., and note 1,
above. WSS claimed that, contrary to what James McHenry told Shaw, the
chiefs left Philadelphia “highly irritated” and no longer bearing a “friendly aspect”
toward the United States. WSS reported that Jonathan Schieffelin
(1762–1837), a land speculator and the agent of Indian affairs at Detroit, was
“apprehensive” about future diplomacy unless he was “authorised to say, that
Commissioners will be appointed, to hear and report fully, to Goverment the subjects
of their uneasiness.” WSS informed JA, “I seriously believe,
that there is an absolute necessity of holding a conference, with them or immediately
reinforcing the frontier posts.” He further noted the possibility of French or Spanish
interference along the Mississippi River “to take the advantage of the present
dissatisfied state of the Indian mind,” which WSS alleged could be
“tranquilized, by pursuing that system of benevolence, and expanded Justice, which is
due from the Civilized to the savage Man” (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 8 May 1799; Immigrant
Entrepreneurship: German-American Business Biographies, 1720 to the Present,
eds. Hartmut Berghoff and Uwe Spiekermann, www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org).