Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

Abigail Adams to Catherine Nuth Johnson, 20 May 1798 Adams, Abigail Johnson, Catherine Nuth
Abigail Adams to Catherine Nuth Johnson
my dear Madam Philadelphia May 20 1798

I received a few days past, Your obliging favour of May 7th, inclosing the Letters of my sons, and one from the God Mother of Mrs Adams, which contains a pleasing and agreable picture of the mutual regard, and affection of our Children.1 Mr Adams never writes me, but he expresses the satisfaction which he derives from his connection long may they live in the full enjoyment of those domestick attachments which sweeten the Cup of Life, and without which, Paridice itself would yeald no solid pleasures.

Mr Adams’s mission to Berlin, tho much envyed by some of his countrymen, has never met his approbation, more however from the circumstance of his receiving the nomination from his Father, than from any other cause. If it had been an advancement of him, either as it respected Rank, or emolument; he would not have been advanced by his Father, but the President conceiving that he might render to his Country more essential Service at Berlin than Lisbon thought proper to change his destination, and for this single act, he has been caluminiated and abused, with all the bitterness of Party spirit the disorganizers of our Country, have represented it, as the 42 advancement of the Presidents own son to a pecuniary office, and a Member of Congress during the present session, has written a Letter to his constituents containing the grocest falshoods which he knew at the time to be such, saying that, the President appointed his son to Prussia, before he met Congress the Jounals of the Senate prove, that the appointment took place in June near the close of the Session. he then adds that he had, had a new outfit every year since he went abroad. I inclose you the Letter as publishd if you will give yourself the trouble to read it, as one specimin amongst ten thousand others, that the Jacobinic party stick at nothing to answer their own views.2

You must have noticed in one of those Letters which I sent you, an apprehension of mr Adams’s least an honorary distinction, conferd upon him by the Academy of Arts and sciences, originated from his Father. tell him, says his Father, that I say he is a very proud young Man, but that I had no hand in, or lot or part in his Election as a member of that academy, nor knew of it untill I saw his Name upon the Books.—3

I cannot however blame that spirit of independance, which chuses to rest upon its own merrits & individual foundation.

I presume my dear Madam, that you will not consider me acting an improper part, if I mention to you, that as mr Johnson has concluded to place his son at the college in Annapolis, it will be expected by the President, and mr T B Johnsons Tutor, that some notice should be given to them of it. The Age of the University; the Respectability of its institutions, the Number of its students, and the Character of the President, the Corporation and overseers, justly entitle it, to the first Rank amongst the seminaries of Learning in the United States.

Inquiries have been made of me, knowing the connection between our Families, whether mr Johnson was not soon expected to return, as no intimation had been received to the contrary and his Chamber is still held for him.

Mr Otis who is here as a Member of Congress, to whose care your son was confided, mentiond to me that he had not received a line from your son since he left this place4

If you should wish for information upon any point respecting the usages and customs of the University, mr Cranch can inform you— Mr Johnsons behaviour and conduct whilst at Cambridge not only endeared him to his fellow students, but engaged him the particular 43 regard of the President, as I have been informd. it is natural for me to have partialities towards the university where my Grandfather, Father Husband and Sons received their Education. You will pardon me then if I regreet that your son will not finish his Education there. it must however accord more with your feelings to have him near you & with your connection—

There is a publick Letter, from mr Adams to 12th Feb’ry there is nothing to the contrary of their being well at that time.5

accept my dear Madam, my thanks for the obliging present inclosed in your Letter. it has an intrinsick value as the work of your own Hands, and on that account I shall value it much more, than if it did not possess that merit, even tho it had been ten times more costly.

your Letter to mrs smith, I forwarded to her, and I shall not fail to communicate to her, the favourable sentiments so obligingly exprest by you to me.6 The col has been unfortunate. Mrs smith has retired to a Farm about 20 miles from the city of N york— her spirits are not what they once were. her prospects are not pleasent.

alass my dear Madam, Who of us are without our troubles, and our anxieties, what ever our situation or lot in Life?

I pray you to make the Presidents and my respects to mr Johnson Mr Cranch had written us an account of Your Friendly visit, and of mr Johnsons Patronage towards him.7 I trust he will prove worthy of it. my Love to the young Ladies & to your son, from Madam your Friend and Humble servant

A Adams

RC (Adams Papers); docketed by JQA: “Adams Abigail, my mother. / To Mrs Catherine Johnson / Philadelphia 20. May 1798.”

1.

Johnson’s 7 May letter to AA, not found, enclosed JQA’s letter of 7 Feb. to Johnson, for which see vol. 12:383–386. The second enclosure was a letter from LCA of 11 Jan., not found, which AA quoted extensively in her letter to Mary Smith Cranch of 13 June, below.

LCA did not name a godmother in her writings, and the record of her 8 March 1775 baptism at St. Botolph Aldgate, London, does not name a sponsor. The author of the letter was possibly Mrs. Court, a Johnson family friend who dined with LCA and JQA on their wedding night and hosted them in her London home to insulate them from Joshua Johnson’s creditors after he departed for the United States in Sept. 1797. She was probably the same Mrs. Court who served as godmother of LCA’s sister Nancy in London in 1773 (vol. 12:221; London Metropolitan Archives:St. Botolph Aldgate, Register of Baptisms, 1753–1797, p. 368; LCA, D&A , 1:34, 52).

2.

AA was referring to the letter attributed to William Findley that was published in the Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 12 April 1798. For JA’s nomination of JQA as minister to Prussia, see vol. 12:135, 136, 164, 212–214.

3.

For JQA’s election to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in Aug. 1797 and his comments thereon, see vol. 12:279, 353, 373.

4.

For Thomas Baker Johnson’s preparation for and attendance at Harvard College, see vols. 10:346; 12:230, 231.

44 5.

No public letter from JQA dated 12 Feb. 1798 has been found. AA possibly meant his letter to JA of 17 Feb., for which see AA to Cranch, 26 May, and note 2, below.

6.

No letters between Catherine Nuth Johnson and AA2 are extant.

7.

See William Cranch to AA, 8 May, above.

William Smith Shaw to Abigail Adams, 20 May 1798 Shaw, William Smith Adams, Abigail
William Smith Shaw to Abigail Adams
My dear Aunt Cambridge May 20th 1798

Saturday April 21st, I received yours of the 9th. I wrote to you the 1st of April in answer to yours of March 20th, which before this you must have received, and shall always esteem my letters of inestimable value, so long as they purchase yours. The excellent pamphlet you sent me I thank you. The sentiment it contains—the spirit with which it is written prove to me, that the author possesses American blood enough to feel, and American emphasis enough to pronounce the insults of a rapacious, bloody and tyrannical nation. His observations on imigration were to me pecularly pleasing, and interesting because I believe the grand cause of all our present difficulties may be traced to this source—to so many hordes of Foreigners imigrating to America.1 I believe the English government will not allow any alien to be capable of receiving any office whatever. We shall not I am afraid continue long independent as citizens and as a nation, unless we speedily enact some such law. Let us no longer pray, that America may be become an asylum to all nations, but let us encourage [. . .] own men & cultivate our simple manners. Let us, like the silk worm, weave the web From our own bowels, & leaving Europeans, their manufactures, fashions and vices to themselves, pursue our own true interest.

With or before this the President will receive the adress of the collegians. As soon as it was drawn up 170 immediately signed it as fast as we could write our names. There are about 190 students belonging to college.— the greater part who did not sign it were out of town.2 Although the address to the President is expressed in the strongest possible terms, still “words do but wrong, the gratitude we owe him.”3 We know his firmness and independance.

“Tis like a rock besieged in vain by oceans Tis like the polar ice built high to heaven On which the sun with ineffectual flame Plays For a six months day.”4

We anxiously wait For an answer5

Please to write soon.

45

I have written this letter in a great hurry, Please to excuse its errors &c. & believe my hand to be the agent of my heart, when I subscribe myself, your ever affectionate nephew

Wm S Shaw.

When does congress rise?

I have opened my letter, my dear aunt, to tell you of what I cannot bear to write, & what I still hope is not true, that Dr. Welsh is shut up.

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs. Abigail Adams / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “William Shaw 20 / May—” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.

1.

For AA’s letters to Shaw of 20 March and 9 April and Shaw’s letter of 2 April, see vol. 12:456–457, 476–478, 480. With her letter of 9 April, AA sent Shaw Joseph Hopkinson’s What Is Our Situation? And What Our Prospects?, Phila., 1798, Evans, No. 33904, in which the author claimed that the “antagonists” to the federal government met with “few proselytes in this country” but instead found “recruits on the annual supplies of imported patriots,” watching “eagerly from the wharves for the gangs of discontented and factious emigrants that flock in from all parts of the world, and catch them eagerly to their fraternal embraces” (p. 25–26). See also vol. 12:486.

2.

Harvard College students in their address to JA pledged to fight for their country against France: “Our lives are our only property; and we were not the sons of those who sealed our liberties with their blood, if we would not defend with these lives that soil, which now affords a peaceful grave to the mouldering bones of our forefathers” ( Patriotic Addresses , p. 102–103).

3.

Thomas Otway, The Orphan; or, The Unhappy Marriage, A Tragedy, Act II, scene i, line 89.

4.

Charles Symmons, Inez, a Tragedy, London, 1796, p. 95.

5.

JA’s 25 May reply to the Harvard address praised the college and the “accuracy, perspicuity, and beauty” of the students’ words. He also called upon them to preserve themselves from disgrace and concluded, “Your youthful blood has boiled, and it ought to boil. You need not, however, be discouraged. If your cause should require defence in arms, your country will have armies and navies, in which you may secure your own honor, and advance the power, prosperity, and glory of your contemporaries and posterity” (Massachusetts Mercury, 5 June; Patriotic Addresses , p. 104–105).