Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Adams, 29 January 1799 Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw Adams, Abigail
Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Adams
My Dear Sister Atkinson Jan. 29th. 1799

After many expecting, anxious hours for my dear Nephew, I am made happy by seeing his safe arrival announced in the Newspaper— The fibres of my heart cannot remain untouched, while my Sisters must be filled with joy, & gratitude— I claim a share, & feel that I am a maternal Participant— I know that you long to clasp your Son in your fond arms— When he reaches Peace-field you will think the order of nature inverted that the days are shortening, instead of 384 lengthening. Times downy foot will tread so soft, that moments will fly swift, & hours slide unperceived away—. It has been a long separation— O! how thankful that there is not a forever annexed—but that each of you after Sickness, & perils, are living monuments of sparing mercy— After you have pressed him to your fond Bosom, & viewed him over, & over a thousand times, I hope urged by affection, & inclination, I may be indulged with a visit, & partake of the rich repast—enjoy the flow of Soul—

My Friend Mrs Osgood of Haverhill has had a Son absent for ten years, doing business in the east Indies— He got home last week, & is now dead—1 This instance of mortality which I this moment have heard of, gives a severe check to my pleasing anticipations, & adds one more, to the list I am daily receiving, of the precarious tenour upon which we hold our enjoyments, & convinces us, that [“]the spiders most attenuated thread, is Cord, is Cable to man’s tender tie, on earthly bliss.”—2

We have all bad colds, John, & Abby are most sick— William, Ben & us are not so bad—

I am glad to hear of our Brother Cranch’s recovery— We want “the faithful” here upon earth— I have been thinking of writing every day to my dear Mrs Smith, & am ashamed to think I have not more energy— I am rejoiced to see in the late appointments Col. Smith’s name— Though it may not be equal to his merit, & military Talents, yet it is much better than to have them remain useless, when our Country’s exigencies call for men of worth in every department— It is quite a luxury to me to hear the President approves of Williams Services— I hope he will be careful of his health, & of every thing else that he ought—

I hear Mr & Mrs Webster are upon the road, & we [ex]pect them every hour— They bo[th le]ft Us & went on their way singing, & rejoicing last winter, but their notes now must be in the elegiac strain— at least I am sure through the medium of my ears, they cannot but have a most plaintive cadence yet with you, I must say, that a wise Providence allots my portion of happiness, & that though all is not agreeable to my short sight, yet I have more than my deserts— With the tenderest affection I am your Sister

Elizabeth Peabody

The Childeren send love, Mr Peabody his respectful love—to you, & our Brother & Sister Cranch— Louisa accept my love—3

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mrs Peabody Janry / 29th 1799.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.

385 1.

Dr. Isaac Osgood Jr. (1754–1799), Harvard 1775, was the son of Abigail Bailey Osgood (1730–1801) and Isaac Osgood Sr. of Haverhill, Mass., for whom see vol. 8:55. Isaac Jr. had been in the East Indies since 1789 but suffered from “a sudden and rapid inflammation” that led to his death on 27 Jan. 1799, a week after his return to the United States (Russell Leigh Jackson, “Physicians of Essex County,” Essex Inst., Hist. Colls. , 84:182 [April 1948]; “Bailey-Bayley Genealogy,” The Essex Antiquarian, 5:125 [June 1901]; Haverhill Federal Gazette, 1 Feb.).

2.

Edward Young, The Complaint; or, Night Thoughts, Night I, lines 178–180.

3.

The postscript was written vertically in the left margin.

Charles Adams to John Adams, 31 January 1799 Adams, Charles Adams, John
Charles Adams to John Adams
My dear Sir New York Jany 31st 1799

Mr Francis Baretto has as he informs me applied for the Consulate at Madeira and has requested me to mention you to him as an acquaintance. He is a Native of that Island though for many years a Citizen of this Nation He has been known to me for more than ten years and his misfortunes of various kinds have excited my compassion and esteem as I beleive he did not merit them.1 If I should err with respect to my sentiments of what are here called Hamilton’s appointments I hope you will not impute it to any wrong motive He has become the Universal Recommendator Many of the appointments made as I have reason to beleive at his request are spoken of as extremely improper I could mention many Daubeny for instance as first Leutt of the Navy when there is not a single Merchant who would trust him with the Command of a Sloop of Twenty tons

Nay he even went so far as to say at his own Table when I was present; that he had, in his own words “Been that day appointing a Son of the Notorious Bill Livingston’s a Midshipman in our Navy” This modest speech was addressed to Church whose reply was you have then I find weaknesses not confined to the female sex: which produced a laugh and perhaps was not thought of by any person but myself afterwards.2

We are all well and happy in the company of my brother Thomas who I think is less altered than any person who has resided so long in Europe. Little pratler Susan says, she must go to Philadelphia to see Grandpapa who loved her so much and told her to come She looks at the picture and says Grandpapa will have me go to him he told me so himself

With sincere affection and respect / I am Yours

Charles Adams

RC (Adams Papers).

386 1.

Francis Baretto (Barretto) had been working as a wine merchant in New York since at least 1790. He was not appointed consul at Madeira, although he was considered for the post in 1800 and 1806 (New York Daily Gazette, 10 April 1790; John Marshall to JA, 25 Aug. 1800, Adams Papers; Samuel Latham Mitchill to James Madison, 21 April 1806, DNA:RG 59, Letters of Application and Recommendation).

2.

Alexander Hamilton’s Dec. 1798 correspondence with James McHenry frequently offered recommendations for appointments. No recommendation for Lloyd S. Daubeny, however, has been found. Daubeny had been appointed a lieutenant in the navy by JA during the congressional recess and would be confirmed by the Senate on 5 Feb. 1799. Benjamin Stoddert wrote to Hamilton on 6 Feb. expressing his hope “that Daubeny should continue to deserve your good opinion.” William Mallet Livingston received a commission as a midshipman on 31 Dec. 1798. He was the son of Col. William Smith Livingston (1755–1794), Princeton 1772, an officer during the Revolutionary War, who had been shunned after he shifted his political allegiance away from the Federalists in the early 1790s (Hamilton, Papers , 22:378, 380, 468–469; U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour. , 5th Cong., 3d sess., p. 308, 310; Register of Officer Personnel United States Navy and Marine Corps and Ships’ Data 1801–1807, Washington, D.C., 1945, p. 32; Maturin Livingston Delafield, “Judge William Smith, of the Supreme Court of the Province of New York,” Magazine of American History, 6:277 [April 1881]; Princetonians , 2:236, 239–240).