Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
Your favor of the 6th: currt. is at hand. It is true, that I mistook the statement in
your preceding, respecting the exchange, but now comprehend it better.1 I agree with you also in opinion as to the
propriety of drawing now rather than at a future day. Money in Holland will probably
find less opportunity of improvement than hitherto. As it respects myself however,
security is all I want for my property.
By all the accounts which reach us from home; there seems to prevail a wonderful spirit of independence, & a resolution to assert it, by all the means within the reach of the people. The dispatches from our Envoys really seemed to operate a sort of divine revelation; but I had no conception that the mist before the eyes of our Countrymen had been previously so thick. To me I confess it is astonishing, that for two years past there should have been two opinions respecting the french Government & their manner of conducting towards us. The spirit that is roused, I well knew to exist among us, but so little of it had appeared, when, in my mind, there had been so much to provoke it, that I began to despair of any powerful display of it in the present crisis. It will do infinite good if properly & judiciously directed.
We have just got through with the ceremonies & rejoicings upon
the occasion of the homage, which took place on friday last. The spectacle was novel to
me, but excited no great degree of interest, because there seemed to be none of that
enthusiastic ardor, which, like the electric spark communicates & spreads from man
to man, upon occasions to which I have been a witness in my own Country.2 Such as prevails, I hope, at this day, among us,
and which will not suddenly be allayed or extinguished. There was here a wonderful
decorum observed by the people, actors & spectators, and the faintness of the shouts which burst forth on the occasion was doubtless owing to
the rigid regard to decency, which so abundantly prevails here on all public
solemnities. The Sieyes was a spectator of the scene.
On Saturday evening there was a brilliant & splendid ball at
the palace, which I found more to my taste than the first ceremony; & yesterday
there was a grand Concert of sacred music, intended for a Te deum. This I found tedious beyond measure, as indeed to me are all Concerts.
Here, I believe, the shew is over—3
With esteem I am, dear sir / your friend & servt
RC (OCHP: Joseph Pitcairn Letters); internal address: “Mr: Pitcairn.”
Not found.
The traditional ceremony of homage paid to a new Prussian king
was held for Frederick William III on 6 July. In his Diary JQA described
the event: “Between 9 and 10 this morning, went to the royal Palace, into the Hall
called the white Hall on the third story. … A secretary read the oath of allegiance,
which was afterwards repeated word by word by all the deputies, and closed with three
cheers of ’Long live Frederick William III.’ Then one of the Ministers read the act
signed by the king declaring on his part that he will maintain all the rights and
privileges of the respective States.” The ceremony, which TBA found “a
vapid & insipid spectacle, at least to an American,”
was then repeated before an audience of thousands (D/JQA/24,
6 July, APM Reel 27; TBA, Journal,
1798
, p. 21).
In his Diary TBA recorded having “passed a tolerable
pleasant time” at the ball, prior to which JQA had a private audience
with Queen Louise. TBA further noted that he attended the concert “for
the sake of seeing the building,” which he found “handsome,” but that he had “no
relish for the music,” which JQA described as “very indifferent” (TBA, Journal,
1798
, p. 21; D/JQA/24, 7, 8 July, APM Reel 27).
th[
1798]
It was with much anxiety and concern that I learnt from mrs Johnson the outrageous attack which was made upon you by mr duncanson, and the dissagreable circumstance of your being Badly wounded. I hope however from What I yesterday heard that the concequences of the wound will not prove so bad as was apprehended. mr Greenleaf call’d yesterday to inquire what intelligence I had received. he spoke like a friend and felt like a Brother I related to him the circumstances as detaild by the pen of mrs Johnson who was exceeding iritated & hurt at the event. I wisht however to See some person from whom I could lean the state of Parties and Character of the persons— I applied to mr Stodard who conversed very fully with me and satisfied me, that to steer between them requires great skill and management. No person would wish an other to Speak in higher terms of approbation and praise of the Honour integrity impartiality & concilitary disposition of an other than mr stodard did of my Nephew and mr stodard if I justly estimate him possesses all those qualities him Self. it was very ungentlemanly and 186 Rascally to attack a Man merely for his being Professionally engaged in the service of his attagonist the Law must decide upon the Equity of the dispute between the Parties—
I cannot say but that I felt hurt that Mr Dalton should tender
himself as Bondsman— a respectable one he is and is therefore I trust the more honorable
security for the good behaviour of Duncanson of whose
Party to whom I hear he has attachd himself I know you too well to suppose you
can harbour any lasting Enimity and I trust you will as you have done stear as clear as
possible of all Paty animosity and bitteness, in all cases consistant with what You owe
to yourself, strive to heal animosities and soften Passions, to do good even to those
who despightly use you and Percecute you. I do not mean by this that the Law ought not
to have its full course and that as a Man unjuctly injured, you ought to have justice
done you.
I hope this will be Mrs Cranch—study also. where a city is divided
against itself, it must come to mine and it is to be regreeted that at the commencment of Private interest should So
embroil Friends and Neighbours. I lament that mrs Johnson should be fixt down in the
very focuse & Hot bed of dissention. I believe no part of America is so
circumstanced, having lived in a Country where one neighbour does not trouble an other,
nor even know them, it must be the more unpleasent to her— I would advise all my friends
to hear see & as far as possible to be silent
Whilst I am writing a Letter is brought me from mrs Johnson, with the pleasing intelligence of your recovery so far as to think of sitting out upon a jouney—1 I hope you will not be too soon; Some accounts have reachd this city of the affair. all of them criminate duncanson— tho some say that he is really injured by mr L—— & R——
I received a Letter from your mother this morning the family were well. I dared not in my last Letters hint the affair to her—2 I shall now give her an account of it—
My Love to mrs Cranch tell her I hope Louissa will meet with as kind a friend in Berlin as a reward for the interest her amiable mother takes in Mrs Cranchs and your situation— I presume mrs Cranch will find a Mother & sisters in your absence. I hope the Washington Family will be gratified with the cordiality which subsists & has never known an interruption between the Late & Present President. I assure you that the invitation will be cordially accepted, and a great relief it will be to the President What can be the occasion of Thorntons animosity to the President. he never injured 187 or offended him— he is the only one of the three who are not personally known—3
Dft (Adams Papers); notation by CFA: “Copy. W. Cranch.”
Not found.
Likely Mary
Smith Cranch to AA, [7 July], above.
AA had written to her on 9 and 12 July. In her 9 July letter,
AA reported the capture of the French privateer Le Croyable and the reluctance of Congress to declare war. She also relayed
Benjamin Rush’s comments on Betsy Quincy Shaw’s illness (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters). For the 12 July letter, see AA to Cranch, 13 July, note 4,
below.
William Thornton (1759–1828), University of Aberdeen M.D. 1784,
was born on Tortola and became a self-trained architect. In April 1793, George
Washington selected Thornton’s design for the U.S. Capitol, applauding its “Grandeur,
Simplicity and Beauty of the exterior—the propriety with which the apartments are
distributed—and the economy in the mass of the whole structure.” Between 1794 and
1804, Thornton served on the Board of Commissioners, and in the 1796 presidential
election he supported Thomas Jefferson. In June 1798 Thornton “lamented the
war-speeches of our President” and questioned the Federalist emphasis on French
depredations over those of the British, causing Tristram Dalton to claim that Thornton
was part of a French faction in the district trying to divide the country. According
to Dalton, Thornton possessed “a philosophical hatred to
Kings, without Distinction—for a violent attachment to
the French—and an open uniform opposition to the Measures
of our Administration” (vol. 12:460–461;
ANB
; Papers of
William Thornton, ed. C. M. Harris and Daniel Preston, Charlottesville, Va.,
1995, p. li, 238–242, 465; Washington,
Papers, Presidential Series, 12:71–72; Dalton to Bailey Bartlett, 21 June, Adams Papers).