Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
th1798
I received your Letter of July 4th.
1 I was indeed so allarmd at the
beginning of it, as scarcly to have power or fortitude to proceed. I thought the next
line was to anounce to me the death of one, or other of our Children. happily that was
not the case tho the affair which gave rise to your Letters is very destressing to me
I thank God 182 that it did not prove a fatal one. I know the
candid and Generous mind of my Nephew too well to believe him in any way the agressor.
he would much sooner receive an injury than do one, and I have reason to think the
more intimately you know him, the more he will rise in your esteem— Nothing but
misfortunes seem to have marked his way ever since he first went to the Federal city.
his Benevolence & the Generous confidence of youth, a Strong sense of probity and
honour in his own Breast, led him to place too great a confidence in others, to his
own injury, but mr Morris drew every one into his vortex, who did any buisness with,
or for him. as you represent the affair, mr d
As to mr D——s Bondsman, I know not what to say, or what plea he
may have to urge. I have ever lived in habits of friendly intercourse with the whole
Family, and considerd them amongst my firmest Friends. I am not insensible to their
vunerable past, but mr dalton has always been considerd by the President, and myself,
as a Gentleman of honour and integrity. he knows mr Cranch & his whole family he
has lived in habits of friendly intercourse with them, & mine, for many years—nor
can I suppose him capable of taking part against them. what facination may have bound
him to mr Duncanson, or any of Family to him, may be better known by others, than
myself—3 I have been in company with
Capt D—— at New york some years since. his manners were not particularly attractive to
me, but I am very ignorant of all th[. . .] Party squables which subsist; either in
Washington or George Town I he[. . .] the late President had trouble Enough in
arranging the Buisness of the city the Present President has had enough of it, since
he came into office, but has been too much occupied with the approaching Calamities
183 of our Country to attend So much to it, as he
otherways would have done—and he has not contnued the commissoners in any thing, which
they esteemed for the Benifit of it. I scarcly think it
possible for him to visit it this Season. he is overpowerd with Buisness, and if he
can get a respite of a few weeks, it must be Northward for his Health requires it. I
read him that part of your Letters which respects mr J——n. he has not heard of the
intended resignation, tho I believe he has of the disscentions. I presume it must be a
very unpleasent & uncomfortable Birth for a Man who values his Peace or quiet.
Pray my dear Madam continue to inform me of the state of my Nephews Health. I dare not communicate it to his Parents untill I hear further. he is very dear to them, and it will greatly afflict and distress them. I have in Charge from them their best respects to mr Johnson and yourself. I rejoice that Mrs Cranch is so near you; and that you & the Ladies take so kind an interest for them.
A few lines from Thomas of March 30th the family were then well—4 I hope soon to hear more fully from them
I am my dear Madam / your truly / affectionate Friend
my Love to mr & mrs Cranch—
I open my Letter this Evening to inform you that Captain Decausler in the deleware—who saild on fryday has this moment returnd with a french Prize of 10 Guns, & 70 men, upon which I congratulate my Country— this is the first Capture—5
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs Catharine Johnson / George Town.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
Not found.
Capt. William Mayne Duncanson (d. 1812), a merchant in India,
arrived in New York City in 1794 and soon became involved in several financial
ventures in Washington, D.C., in association with Morris, Nicholson, & Greenleaf;
Thomas Law; and James Ray. The failure of these enterprises left Duncanson at odds
with his partners. His dispute with Law over property in the district was concluded in
arbitration that awarded Duncanson $1,817.64 on 31 July 1798. After the dissolution of
his mercantile partnership with Ray, Ray attempted to avoid payments toward the firm’s
debts relating to the capture of the ship Mount Vernon,
purchased in 1796, which resulted in lawsuits that stretched until 1809. William
Cranch represented Ray and James Greenleaf, and it was in early July that Duncanson
attacked Cranch after being served notice of a Greenleaf lawsuit against him.
Duncanson punished Cranch’s “insolence” with a horsewhip, and he was indicted and
fined for the assault (Allen C. Clark, “William Mayne Duncanson,” Columbia Hist. Soc., Records
, 14:1, 4–6, 13–18, 24 [1911]; Arnebeck, Through a Fiery Trial
, p. 487; Alexandria
Times, 12, 18 Oct. 1798).
Tristram Dalton did not post bond for Duncanson (AA to Johnson, 24 July, CSmH:HM 20281; Ruth Hooper Dalton to AA, 28 July, below).
Not found.
The Delaware, Capt. Stephen Decatur,
184 one day after setting sail captured the French
privateer Le Croyable on 7 July. As the Delaware began its cruise, the Alexander Hamilton, en route to Baltimore, alerted Decatur about a privateer
in the area and directed him on a course to pursue. After drawing the privateer in for
a fight, the 20-gun Delaware forced the vessel to
surrender. Decatur (1752–1808) commanded American privateers during the Revolutionary
War and was the father of Como. Stephen Decatur (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 9 July;
Naval Documents of the
Quasi-War
, 1:175;
ANB
).
Your favor of the 6th: currt. is at hand. It is true, that I mistook the statement in
your preceding, respecting the exchange, but now comprehend it better.1 I agree with you also in opinion as to the
propriety of drawing now rather than at a future day. Money in Holland will probably
find less opportunity of improvement than hitherto. As it respects myself however,
security is all I want for my property.
By all the accounts which reach us from home; there seems to prevail a wonderful spirit of independence, & a resolution to assert it, by all the means within the reach of the people. The dispatches from our Envoys really seemed to operate a sort of divine revelation; but I had no conception that the mist before the eyes of our Countrymen had been previously so thick. To me I confess it is astonishing, that for two years past there should have been two opinions respecting the french Government & their manner of conducting towards us. The spirit that is roused, I well knew to exist among us, but so little of it had appeared, when, in my mind, there had been so much to provoke it, that I began to despair of any powerful display of it in the present crisis. It will do infinite good if properly & judiciously directed.
We have just got through with the ceremonies & rejoicings upon
the occasion of the homage, which took place on friday last. The spectacle was novel to
me, but excited no great degree of interest, because there seemed to be none of that
enthusiastic ardor, which, like the electric spark communicates & spreads from man
to man, upon occasions to which I have been a witness in my own Country.2 Such as prevails, I hope, at this day, among us,
and which will not suddenly be allayed or extinguished. There was here a wonderful
decorum observed by the people, actors & spectators, and the faintness of the shouts which burst forth on the occasion was doubtless owing to
the rigid regard to decency, which so abundantly prevails here on all public
solemnities. The Sieyes was a spectator of the scene.
On Saturday evening there was a brilliant & splendid ball at
the palace, which I found more to my taste than the first ceremony; & yesterday
there was a grand Concert of sacred music, intended for a Te deum. This I found tedious beyond measure, as indeed to me are all Concerts.
Here, I believe, the shew is over—3
With esteem I am, dear sir / your friend & servt
RC (OCHP: Joseph Pitcairn Letters); internal address: “Mr: Pitcairn.”
Not found.
The traditional ceremony of homage paid to a new Prussian king
was held for Frederick William III on 6 July. In his Diary JQA described
the event: “Between 9 and 10 this morning, went to the royal Palace, into the Hall
called the white Hall on the third story. … A secretary read the oath of allegiance,
which was afterwards repeated word by word by all the deputies, and closed with three
cheers of ’Long live Frederick William III.’ Then one of the Ministers read the act
signed by the king declaring on his part that he will maintain all the rights and
privileges of the respective States.” The ceremony, which TBA found “a
vapid & insipid spectacle, at least to an American,”
was then repeated before an audience of thousands (D/JQA/24,
6 July, APM Reel 27; TBA, Journal,
1798
, p. 21).
In his Diary TBA recorded having “passed a tolerable
pleasant time” at the ball, prior to which JQA had a private audience
with Queen Louise. TBA further noted that he attended the concert “for
the sake of seeing the building,” which he found “handsome,” but that he had “no
relish for the music,” which JQA described as “very indifferent” (TBA, Journal,
1798
, p. 21; D/JQA/24, 7, 8 July, APM Reel 27).