Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

Abigail Adams to Catherine Nuth Johnson, 8 July 1798 Adams, Abigail Johnson, Catherine Nuth
Abigail Adams to Catherine Nuth Johnson
My Dear Madam Philadelphia July 8th 1798

I received your Letter of July 4th. 1 I was indeed so allarmd at the beginning of it, as scarcly to have power or fortitude to proceed. I thought the next line was to anounce to me the death of one, or other of our Children. happily that was not the case tho the affair which gave rise to your Letters is very destressing to me I thank God 182 that it did not prove a fatal one. I know the candid and Generous mind of my Nephew too well to believe him in any way the agressor. he would much sooner receive an injury than do one, and I have reason to think the more intimately you know him, the more he will rise in your esteem— Nothing but misfortunes seem to have marked his way ever since he first went to the Federal city. his Benevolence & the Generous confidence of youth, a Strong sense of probity and honour in his own Breast, led him to place too great a confidence in others, to his own injury, but mr Morris drew every one into his vortex, who did any buisness with, or for him. as you represent the affair, mr d appears to have transferd his Malice to the Agent of mr Roy, and to have insulted mr Cranch, previous to the Blow which he so basely inflicted. I hope he has not lastingly injured him—but a blow upon the Head, and that sufficient to lay a man flat, is too serious a Buisness to be considered in a very light point of view. mr Cranch’s fair and unoffending Character will bear him up, where ever truth and justice prevail, and the Law I trust will punish the offender most of our troubles in this Country arrise from imported foreigners, Men who have neither an affection for our Laws Government or People, who many of them, escape from the just vengence of their own Country, & flee to this which affords them protection and shelter. here they are still wrestless & turbulent, and prove that the Leopard cannot change his spots.2

As to mr D——s Bondsman, I know not what to say, or what plea he may have to urge. I have ever lived in habits of friendly intercourse with the whole Family, and considerd them amongst my firmest Friends. I am not insensible to their vunerable past, but mr dalton has always been considerd by the President, and myself, as a Gentleman of honour and integrity. he knows mr Cranch & his whole family he has lived in habits of friendly intercourse with them, & mine, for many years—nor can I suppose him capable of taking part against them. what facination may have bound him to mr Duncanson, or any of Family to him, may be better known by others, than myself—3 I have been in company with Capt D—— at New york some years since. his manners were not particularly attractive to me, but I am very ignorant of all th[. . .] Party squables which subsist; either in Washington or George Town I he[. . .] the late President had trouble Enough in arranging the Buisness of the city the Present President has had enough of it, since he came into office, but has been too much occupied with the approaching Calamities 183 of our Country to attend So much to it, as he otherways would have done—and he has not contnued the commissoners in any thing, which they esteemed for the Benifit of it. I scarcly think it possible for him to visit it this Season. he is overpowerd with Buisness, and if he can get a respite of a few weeks, it must be Northward for his Health requires it. I read him that part of your Letters which respects mr J——n. he has not heard of the intended resignation, tho I believe he has of the disscentions. I presume it must be a very unpleasent & uncomfortable Birth for a Man who values his Peace or quiet.

Pray my dear Madam continue to inform me of the state of my Nephews Health. I dare not communicate it to his Parents untill I hear further. he is very dear to them, and it will greatly afflict and distress them. I have in Charge from them their best respects to mr Johnson and yourself. I rejoice that Mrs Cranch is so near you; and that you & the Ladies take so kind an interest for them.

A few lines from Thomas of March 30th the family were then well—4 I hope soon to hear more fully from them

I am my dear Madam / your truly / affectionate Friend

Abigail Adams

my Love to mr & mrs Cranch—

I open my Letter this Evening to inform you that Captain Decausler in the deleware—who saild on fryday has this moment returnd with a french Prize of 10 Guns, & 70 men, upon which I congratulate my Country— this is the first Capture—5

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs Catharine Johnson / George Town.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.

1.

Not found.

2.

Capt. William Mayne Duncanson (d. 1812), a merchant in India, arrived in New York City in 1794 and soon became involved in several financial ventures in Washington, D.C., in association with Morris, Nicholson, & Greenleaf; Thomas Law; and James Ray. The failure of these enterprises left Duncanson at odds with his partners. His dispute with Law over property in the district was concluded in arbitration that awarded Duncanson $1,817.64 on 31 July 1798. After the dissolution of his mercantile partnership with Ray, Ray attempted to avoid payments toward the firm’s debts relating to the capture of the ship Mount Vernon, purchased in 1796, which resulted in lawsuits that stretched until 1809. William Cranch represented Ray and James Greenleaf, and it was in early July that Duncanson attacked Cranch after being served notice of a Greenleaf lawsuit against him. Duncanson punished Cranch’s “insolence” with a horsewhip, and he was indicted and fined for the assault (Allen C. Clark, “William Mayne Duncanson,” Columbia Hist. Soc., Records , 14:1, 4–6, 13–18, 24 [1911]; Arnebeck, Through a Fiery Trial , p. 487; Alexandria Times, 12, 18 Oct. 1798).

3.

Tristram Dalton did not post bond for Duncanson (AA to Johnson, 24 July, CSmH:HM 20281; Ruth Hooper Dalton to AA, 28 July, below).

4.

Not found.

5.

The Delaware, Capt. Stephen Decatur, 184 one day after setting sail captured the French privateer Le Croyable on 7 July. As the Delaware began its cruise, the Alexander Hamilton, en route to Baltimore, alerted Decatur about a privateer in the area and directed him on a course to pursue. After drawing the privateer in for a fight, the 20-gun Delaware forced the vessel to surrender. Decatur (1752–1808) commanded American privateers during the Revolutionary War and was the father of Como. Stephen Decatur (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 9 July; Naval Documents of the Quasi-War , 1:175; ANB ).

Thomas Boylston Adams to Joseph Pitcairn, 9 July 1798 Adams, Thomas Boylston Pitcairn, Joseph
Thomas Boylston Adams to Joseph Pitcairn
Dear Sir. Berlin 9 July 1798

Your favor of the 6th: currt. is at hand. It is true, that I mistook the statement in your preceding, respecting the exchange, but now comprehend it better.1 I agree with you also in opinion as to the propriety of drawing now rather than at a future day. Money in Holland will probably find less opportunity of improvement than hitherto. As it respects myself however, security is all I want for my property.

By all the accounts which reach us from home; there seems to prevail a wonderful spirit of independence, & a resolution to assert it, by all the means within the reach of the people. The dispatches from our Envoys really seemed to operate a sort of divine revelation; but I had no conception that the mist before the eyes of our Countrymen had been previously so thick. To me I confess it is astonishing, that for two years past there should have been two opinions respecting the french Government & their manner of conducting towards us. The spirit that is roused, I well knew to exist among us, but so little of it had appeared, when, in my mind, there had been so much to provoke it, that I began to despair of any powerful display of it in the present crisis. It will do infinite good if properly & judiciously directed.

We have just got through with the ceremonies & rejoicings upon the occasion of the homage, which took place on friday last. The spectacle was novel to me, but excited no great degree of interest, because there seemed to be none of that enthusiastic ardor, which, like the electric spark communicates & spreads from man to man, upon occasions to which I have been a witness in my own Country.2 Such as prevails, I hope, at this day, among us, and which will not suddenly be allayed or extinguished. There was here a wonderful decorum observed by the people, actors & spectators, and the faintness of the shouts which burst forth on the occasion was doubtless owing to the rigid regard to decency, which so abundantly prevails here on all public solemnities. The Sieyes was a spectator of the scene.

185

On Saturday evening there was a brilliant & splendid ball at the palace, which I found more to my taste than the first ceremony; & yesterday there was a grand Concert of sacred music, intended for a Te deum. This I found tedious beyond measure, as indeed to me are all Concerts. Here, I believe, the shew is over—3

With esteem I am, dear sir / your friend & servt

Thomas B Adams

RC (OCHP: Joseph Pitcairn Letters); internal address: “Mr: Pitcairn.”

1.

Not found.

2.

The traditional ceremony of homage paid to a new Prussian king was held for Frederick William III on 6 July. In his Diary JQA described the event: “Between 9 and 10 this morning, went to the royal Palace, into the Hall called the white Hall on the third story. … A secretary read the oath of allegiance, which was afterwards repeated word by word by all the deputies, and closed with three cheers of ’Long live Frederick William III.’ Then one of the Ministers read the act signed by the king declaring on his part that he will maintain all the rights and privileges of the respective States.” The ceremony, which TBA found “a vapid & insipid spectacle, at least to an American,” was then repeated before an audience of thousands (D/JQA/24, 6 July, APM Reel 27; TBA, Journal, 1798 , p. 21).

3.

In his Diary TBA recorded having “passed a tolerable pleasant time” at the ball, prior to which JQA had a private audience with Queen Louise. TBA further noted that he attended the concert “for the sake of seeing the building,” which he found “handsome,” but that he had “no relish for the music,” which JQA described as “very indifferent” (TBA, Journal, 1798 , p. 21; D/JQA/24, 7, 8 July, APM Reel 27).