Adams Family Correspondence, volume 12
I wrote you on the 25 of October & 29 of Decr: 1796. & on the 14th: of May
& 1st: of August of the last year.1 All these letters excepting that of 14 May,
related to my affairs in your hands.— I have never received any answer whatever to
either of them. That of 29 Decr: I think must have
miscarried, but I have long since received answers from other persons, to letters which
went by the same opportunities as the others to you. In my letter of the first of August
last, I indicated to you three several persons at London, at Hamburg & at Bremen,
under cover to whom you might safely direct letters for me. I have received two months
ago answers to other letters, which went at the same time with that of 1st: August, but not a line not a syllable from you. I have not
a word from you upon the subject of my business later than the 7th: Septr: 1796.2 In all my letters I have urged you to write me,
constantly & frequently, and 401 particularly to send
me a state of the accounts between us at the close of every year. I must in the most
pointed manner again entreat you to shew this attention to my business. The neglect of
it introduces inevitable disorder into my own arrangements, and you have lived long
enough in the world to know that disorder is of itself a great advance towards ruin
I am your affectionate brother.
LbC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “Charles Adams Esqr.”;
APM Reel 130.
For JQA to CA, 25 Oct. and 29 Dec. 1796, see vol. 11:390–392, 465–466. In his 14 May 1797 letter to CA, he noted: “I have not a syllable from you for many months. I endeavour to apologize for you by concluding that you are extremely pressed with business. It is at least the most pleasing way of accounting for the long interval since you wrote me last” (LbC, APM Reel 130).
Not found.
I have not received a Line from Since the last of Jan’ry
1 Betsy is
much distresst to hear from her sister and I am not a little anxious. I hoped the
twesday post as usual would have given me some information. I must attribute it to the
weather for my dear sister, write me a line every post if only to tell me how you all
are.
You will see much to your mortification, that congress have been
fiteing, not the French, but the Lyon, not the Noble British Lyon, but the beastly
transported Lyon. I am of the Quakers mind whom Peter Porcupine quotes “speakin of the
Irish, he says, there is no mediocrity, or medium of Character in these people: they are
either the most noble, brave generous and best bred: or the most ruffian like dirty and
black gaurd of all the creation.[”]2 What a picture will these, 14 teen days make
upon our Journals?! yet are the supporters of Lyon alone to blame: the Gentlemen the real federilist would have expeld him
instantly, and if it were possible a federilist could be found thus to have degraded
himself, he would not have cost the Country 14 days debate, besides the infamy and
disgrace of sitting again there I inclose you a paper containing a speach or two upon
the subject3 the Brute has not been in
the house for several Days, but he is unfealing enough to go again, and if he does, I
have my apprehensions of something still more unpleasent.
These Philadelphians are a strange set of people, making
pretensions to give Laws of politeness and propriety to the union. they have the least
feeling of real genuine politeness of any people with 402 whom I am
acquainted. as an instance of it, they are about to celebrate, not the Birth day of the
first Majestrate of the union as such, but of General Washingtons Birth day, and have
had the politeness to send invitations to the President Lady and family to attend it.
The President of the united states to attend the celebration of the birth day in his
publick Character, of a private Citizen! for in no other light can General Washington be
now considerd, how ever Good how ever great his Character, which no person more respects
than his successor. but how could the President appear at their Ball and assembly, but
in a secondary Character, when invited there, to be held up in that light by all foreign
Nations. but these people look not beyond their own important selves. I do not know when
my feelings of contempt have been more calld forth. in answer to the invitation, the
President returnd for answer, “that he had received the card of invitation, and took the
earliest opportunity to inform them, that he delined accepting it.”—4 that the Virginians should celebrate the day is
natural & proper if they please, and so may any others who chuse.5 but the propriety of doing it in the Capital in
the Metropolis of America as these Proud Phylidelphians
have publickly named it, and inviting the Head of the Nation to come and do it too, in
my view is ludicrious beyond compare. I however bite my Lips, and say nothing, but I
wanted to vent my indignation upon paper. you must not however expose it, nor me. it
will be call’d pride it will be calld mortification. I despise them both, as it respects
myself—but as it respects the Character I hold—I will not knowingly degrade it—
Let me know whether a Letter coverd to mr Cranch for dr Tufts has reachd you safely—6 we are all as well as usual. the Baby was here on sunday and is very well. Remember me kindly to all Friends
Your ever affectionate / Sister
RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters).
For Cranch’s 29 Jan. letter, see AA’s reply of 6 Feb., note 1, above.
AA was quoting from the Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 13 February.
The enclosure has not been found but was possibly from the
Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 15 Feb., which
printed Samuel Whittlesey Dana’s 12 Feb. speech to the House of Representatives
stating he would vote to expel Matthew Lyon, removing him “as citizens removed impurities and filth from
their docks and wharves.” Dana also noted that if his fellow representatives chose “to
associate with such a Kennell of Filth,” they would “be
designated as the companions … by being pointed at, by ‘There
goes the member of Congress, who voted to have Matthew Lyon as a
companion!’”
On 12 Feb. Stephen Kingston and others sent JA an
invitation to a ball and supper celebrating George Washington’s 66th birthday to be
held at Ricketts’ Amphitheatre in Philadelphia on 22 Feb. (Adams Papers). Although JA’s reply has not
been found, it was 403 published in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 23 Feb., along with remarks that
JA’s answer was “couched in … impolite & arrogant terms” and that
the organizers “certainly had not the presumption to suppose, that the president of
the U. States would so far forget the dignity of his station as to mingle with shop keepers.” An election caused the event to be held a
day later than planned, and then it was only sparsely attended (Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser, 17 Feb.; Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 23 Feb.; AA to
Mary Smith Cranch, 28 Feb., MWA:Abigail
Adams Letters).
On 22 Feb. Fredericksburg and Norfolk, Va., held celebrations in
honor of Washington’s birthday. In both cities the day began with cannon fire;
citizens in Fredericksburg had a celebratory dinner at Herndon’s tavern followed by a
round of toasts, while those in Norfolk attended a ball at the Borough Tavern (Alexandria Times, 27 Feb., 3 March).
This was probably
AA’s 6 Feb. letter to Cotton Tufts,
above. In a 2 March letter to AA, Cranch noted that Richard Cranch had
“receiv’d the Letter for Doctor Tufts which you inclos’d to him & will receive it
to day. We have sent to the Docr. their was one for him.
We dare not venture it by any body—but tis safe now” (Adams Papers).