Adams Family Correspondence, volume 12
thFeb
ry1798
I received your Letter of Jan’ry and
observed Your communication, somewhat alterd to better suit the Times. I though the
alteration not amiss. the paper you inclosed to me I put into the Hands of the
President. he could not apply the Character as he did not recollect that any such person
had applied. I had an opportunity of shewing it to the secretary at War. he was at no
loss, and mentiond a circumstance of one Gentleman who had put his Name to a Paper in
recommendation of that same Person, who had written a private Letter giving his reasons
for so doing, but at the Same time recommending an other person as much more Suitable
for the place.1 Gentlemen who recommend
to office; should consider that as far as their recommendation has an influence, they
are answerable to their Country for the proper discharge of the trust, and that in very
many instances, recommendations are the only grounds upon which the Executive can act,
for it is impossible to have a personal knowledge, in a Country so extensive as this,
and tho it may be the Wish and desire of the Executive to appoint to office only such
persons as will faithfully discharge the trust reposed in them he may frequently, by the
facility with which respectable people are led to recommend those who apply to them for
office, give to those from whom he would withold, if he had a personal knowledge of
them, and after all the bluster and racket which has been made by those who would
readily engrose all power to themselves, concerning Executive Patronage, it is attended
with much trouble and great anxiety, and as Louis the 14 once observed, that when he
appointed a man to office, he made 99 Enemies and one ungratefull person, for every
person who applies considers his own claims as the best, and his own pretensions the
strongest. Since I have been here, I have known a Member of Congress quit his Seat and
go home, vowing he would 379 not return again,
merely for being dissapointed in a recommendation which he gave.—2 The Jacobins think they have little Chance, and
are therefore for taking from the President the power vested in him by the constitution.
the Question has not yet been determined respecting the foreign intercourse Bill as it
is term’d, that gives place to a very dirty Buisness which has already occupied the
house 3 days, and is like to continue 3 days longer for ought I see. yet it is a subject
which as Gentlemen I should suppose might have been setled in one day. the papers will
give you a statement of the Buisness. Mr Griswold is a very respectable Member from the
state of Conneticut, a Gentleman of Strong sensibility and high spirit, but very
fortunately on this occasion so far respected the House and the Decorum due to it whilst
sitting, that he restraind his uplifted Hand, and withheld the blow he was just going to
lay upon Lyon.— Party, Party Spirit enters into this degrading buisness, and it is
thought that 2 thirds of the House will not vote for the expulsion of this unclean
Beast; you will find on the Nay side citizen Nicholas and citizen Jacobins from our own
state I doubt not.3
Not a word yet from our Envoys either they are held, in durance vile, or their dispatches are intercepted. knowing how great the anxiety of our Country must be, I am certain they would take early and constant measures to inform their Government. Mr Murrey writes in one of his dispatches, that he learnt that no communication was permitted them with any citizen of France, that they were not allowd even to speak to them. this being the case, no communications can be made but such as our good Allies chuse—
You will see in Fennos paper of the 5 & 6th of Feb’ry “observations upon the operation of the
French Constitution[”] &c written by the same Hand as
those which I sent you before. you will judge of the propriety of having them Published
in Boston. the People of N England generally read more, and judge better than they do
here, where so many discordent particles are jumbled together as in this city. as you
take the papers I do not think it worth while to inclose them to you—
Mr otis got in this morning and will add one to the respectable Number of Federilist, but it is a Sad thing to have such a ——— worse than dead weight attachd to them, benumbing every active measure, and opposing every dignified proposition.4
my kind regards to mrs smith & Children, to the Doctor and Mrs
Welch and to all other inquiring Friends— The President 380 request me to ask you for what you can purchase a genuine pipe of old Maderia wine.
you will not forget a hundred Bushels oats for us—even tho you give 2/6 pr Bushel the
P——t will send you an order upon Genll Lincoln for any sum
of money you may lay out for him—
when any vessel is about to Sail for Hamburgh or Bremin, will you be so good as to send mr Adams the latest papers addrest to the care of the different consuls— he complains much for want of intelligence from his Country. I fear he will get less now than ever—
Let Dr Welch know that the Gentleman mentiond by him is placed upon the List of applicants—
There are Letters from mr King as late as october & from mr
Murrey to the 10 Nov’br they are as much in the dark with
respect to our envoys as we are here.5 if
the French are seriously bent upon a decent upon England, no doubt an Embargo has taken
place— there will nothing be done in Congress I fear untill we receive dispatches, and
whether then any measures for defence can be carried, is by some doubted. the spirit
must come from the East & from the North. pray my dear sir, do all in your power to
promote the choice of true federilist from our state at the next Election. do not send
Men, who would bear to have their faces spit in, or countanance it in others. this
constant uphill work is enough to discourage every Man who has not the strength of
Hercules, and might be set down for an Eight Labour— my paper admonishes me to subscribe
yours &c
RC (MHi:Smith-Carter Family Papers); docketed: “A. Adams 1798.”
Neither the letter nor the enclosure regarding this application has been found.
AA was likely referring to John Vining, who resigned
from the Senate on 19 Jan. (
Biog. Dir. Cong.
).
For the Lyon-Griswold affair, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 8, above.
On 16 Jan. Samuel Sewall asked the House of Representatives for a
three-week leave of absence for Harrison Gray Otis, to which the House consented. Otis
was in Boston from 20 to 29 Jan., the reason for which was credited to “a pulmonary
complaint” (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 17
Jan.; Boston Columbian Centinel, 24, 31 Jan.).
Rufus King made no mention of the envoys in his letter to Timothy
Pickering of 31 Oct. 1797. Similarly, in a letter to Pickering of 10 Nov., William
Vans Murray offered no concrete news of the envoys but wrote, “I can not bring myself
to believe that the Directorie will absolutely reject them, until they can hear from
America, after the opening of the Session of Congress.” He also suggested that if
France was “seriously determined” to invade England then it might “detain the
commissioners between hopes and fears until the moment approaches of the attempt at
the invasion” (The Life and Correspondence of Rufus King,
ed. Charles R. King, N.Y., 1894–1900, 6 vols., 2:236–237; DNA:RG 59, Despatches from United States
Ministers to the Netherlands, 1794–1906, Microfilm, Reel 4).