Papers of John Adams, volume 21
Mr: Hall arrived a few days
ago, and delivered to me your favours of Novr:
17. and Decr: 12. The first acknowledges the
receipt of my N. 11. July 27. But I feel somewhat concerned lest my next
number to that, written very soon after it may have miscarried, as it should
regularly have reached you before the date of your last.1
Mr: Randolph’s pamphlet had
arrived before Mr: Hall, but I had seen only
some extracts from it which were and yet are dealt out in some of the daily
papers here.2 I think he
rolls the stone of Sisyphus with a more impetuous recoil than I ever
witnessed before. I confess I should never have thought that even the
delirium of guilt could publish such a
production and imagine it would injure the reputation of the President, or
defend that of the writer.— In my last numbered Letter to you, I mentioned
an opinion that the party in France would perhaps return to the courting
system, and I am almost tempted to believe that they advised this
publication by way of atonement.3 For it seems to me impossible that
the production should have been given to the world but by the agency of a
person inveterate even to rancour against Mr:
Randolph, and disposed to raise the character of the President, higher if
possible than its former elevation.
But the publication to the world of confidential opinions
and sentiments entertained by the President with respect to the European
parties and Governments, will produce in a degree the effect for which they were it was calculated. They will
produce some mischief. The sensation here upon seeing a proclamation to all
the world that the President has been inimical to England and the friend of
the french cause, is very perceptible and very strong. It will not only
corroborate and confirm that deep rooted malignity towards us which governs
the cabinet but it alienates and irritates the part of the Nation who are
well disposed towards us.
They have however so much at present upon their hands
that they will not quarrel with us. But no small use will be made of this
pamphlet, by the Ministers of this Country. I have reason to suppose that it
has given them great satisfaction; for their purposes concur so thoroughly
with those of Mr: Randolph that they seize with
449 delight every thing that contributes
to promote them. It is one of those singularities, which seem reserved
exclusively for the complication of political intrigues, that the views of
our french party, and those of the Hawkesbury conclave here are exactly the
same, and accordingly they are continually playing into each other’s hands.
They wish to perpetuate the variances between the United States and Britain,
and ardently catch at every thing that has a tendency to that end.
Upon this subject I think it necessary to give you my
opinion explicitly. The cabinet here have of late affected a great regard
for the Government of the United States. In
this particular too they have coincided with our most virulent anarchists,
and have taken all possible pains to countenance and give credit to their assertions that the American
administration were upon terms of great harmony with that of Britain. The
truth is that the American Government and those
who are at the head of its administration have not upon Earth more rancorous
enemies, than the springs which move the Executive machine of this Country.
They know perfectly well that the strength as well as the prosperity of the
United States depend upon the efficiency of the Government, and above all
things they dread the proof which any continued course of tranquility would
afford that it is a good practical Government. In short every one of their
feelings individual and national is hostile to us, and the policy of
Vergennes & Montmorin, to prevent our acquiring a consistency, which
would make us really formidable is here envenomed by the recollection of
former defeat and disappointment.
Between the United States and Great-Britain no cordiality can exist. I do not think it is on
our part to be desired. But Peace may, and I hope will continue,
notwithstanding all the conspiracies that have been formed against it in
America and in Europe.
Before this time I presume you will have received my
letters since I left the Hague which will shew that I did not flinch on the subject of my orders to come here and
treat. The result of my coming has hitherto been even more unpleasant
personally speaking than I had anticipated; but I have made no sacrifice of
my duty or of my Country’s Interests: my conduct here has been fully
detailed in my dispatches. If it shall meet the approbation of the
Government all my wishes will be satisfied: but most assuredly it will not
suit the views of any partizans either of
France or Britain. I never can and never will deviate from my own sense of
duty to please either
But since the return of Mr:
Pinckney I have had nothing to do here, though my orders do not permit me to
return to Holland, 450
without waiting for further instructions. I have hitherto been tolerably
patient; but can hardly answer how much longer I shall be so.
I enclose the newspapers4 and remain in all duty & affection your Son
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The Vice-President.”;
endorsed: “No. 17 / J. Q. Adams / London
Feb. 10. 1796” and by AA: “J Q A Febry 10 1796.”
LbC (Adams
Papers); APM Reel
130. FC-Pr (Adams
Papers); APM Reel
131. Tr (Adams
Papers).
AFC
, 11:63–65, 84–85. JQA’s letter
of 27 July 1795 (Adams
Papers) reported on European political news and accompanied
various French publications that “discover in some degree the state of
the public mind, and furnish materials for the History of a
philosophical Revolution. The man that can read them and retain an ardor
for Revolutions, must indeed possess more philosophy than humanity.” He
wrote again on 27 Aug. to recommend the bearer, Mr. Montfort, a Dutch
clergyman immigrating to America. Boston lawyer Joseph Hall delivered
JA’s 12 Dec. letter, along with American newspapers, to
JQA (LbC, APM Reel 128).
Edmund Randolph, eager to restore his reputation
following a scandalous exit from the State Department, published A Vindication of Mr. Randolph’s
Resignation, Phila., 1795, Evans, No. 29384, in December. Despite the
inclusion of French diplomatic dispatches and an affidavit from Jean
Antoine Joseph Fauchet on his behalf, the effort only further tarnished
Randolph’s public reputation. As JA warned
JQA, “Your old Friend real or pretended, Randolph is under
a dark Cloud and his Behaviour Under it increases its blackness and
thickness. I think his Business is done” (
AFC
, 11:39, 84).
In his letter No. 16 of 29 Dec., JQA assessed the recent creation of the French Directory. While he thought that the body “has given to their deliberations a character of order, and decorum hitherto unknown since the commencement of their Revolution,” he deemed the model of a plural executive to be impracticable (Adams Papers).
The enclosures have not been found.