Papers of John Adams, volume 21
th:1792
Your obliging favor of the 29th: of January, would not have remained so long unanswered, had
not sickness in my family of a long continuance and distressing nature
interrupted my inclination to acknowledge my obligations to you. The
“Anticipation” which you observe to have retarded an “heavy attack.” I do
not fully understand. Such is the constitution of the human mind, that
nations and other great bodies of men, can never be expected to have even
virtues but in extremes. The habit of praise as well as of blame runs
naturally to extravagance. I cannot vindicate every measure which you say is
a topick of censure; and if neither prevention nor remedy are in my power,
it would do no good for me to concur in the blame. I have read the hints
&c on an American excise; the Remarks on Toll-bridges and turnpike
Roads, and the consolatory Letter to an afflicted friend; and I think they
are proofs of a talent at composition which ought not to be neglected, of a
Judgement which will be respected, and of a virtuous disposition which
cannot but be loved and esteemed. If the Volumes you Received should afford
you any amusement, or occasion any new reflections, I shall be happy. They
were all written and printed, except the last letter of the last volume,
before the Constitution of the United States reached my hand. They lay open
all the sources of information on the subject, and if my own opinion
expressed in them is not well founded, the reader will know where to look
for facts, arguments and objections against it. I have seen no rational
attempt to confute my doctrines unless it be in a writer under the signature
of Philodemos, who finally rests his argument on this position, “that the
people of America are, and will continue to be, different in knowledge and
virtue from all other people who are or have been.”1 On this position I am willing to
rest it, and leave to time and experience the decision. If ambition and
avarice are not as strong in this Country, as in others, my observations
have been inaccurate. If intrigues and manuevres in Elections have not been
practised, and are not now practising, I have been misinformed; and if the
people are not every day deceived by artifice and falsehood, I have no
understanding. The share that has been assigned to me in publick affairs the
circumstances of my fortune and family, as well as my age, make me very
willing to resign to any 112 other,
who may possess more of the popular favor, or national confidence. The
Hozanna’s of blind Enthusiasts, I never covetted. The esteem of the wise and
the good will ever be dear to the heart of / Sir your obliged humble
servant
LbC in TBA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal
address: “Nathaniel Hazard Esqr:”; APM Reel 115.
JA referred to four essays that appeared
under the pseudonym Philodemos in the New York Daily Advertiser, 21, 28 June 1791 and 5, 26 July,
interrogating the tripartite balance of power as outlined by
JA in his
Defence of the Const.
and
defining the duties of popular sovereignty.