Papers of John Adams, volume 20
y.22
d.1791
From the Borders of the Grave, revived, and even established in Health, I once more present my Respects with my accustomed Fervency to You and Yours.
But, with my Respects I must also send my Complaints and Supplications.
In a Transaction where you was only, according to your own chosen
Expression, Teste di Legno, I was fretted disgraced & beslaved; and have taken some
Measures for Emancipation. You will know why I was not
Collector of this Port; but I have never told you how
perfectly you reconciled me at
first to my present Office, or how I ceased afterwards even to wish for any Change during the Remainder of my Days. But,
Sir, what tended heretofore to give me Tranquillity serves at present to heighten my
Chagrin. Possessing the good Will of the President and yourself I am martyred by one or
more Committee-Men who have carried private Friendship and Relationships into their
public official Doings. I know but two of the Committee one of whom can give no better
Rationale of the inimical Transaction than because the other “perhaps was more a Friend
to the Collector than to the Naval officer,” while in fact he was himself brother in Law
to a Surveyor, and the Naval Officer is sacrificed to both.
This will appear œnigmatical till you have read my Letter to mr Gerry.1 I
intreat you to do that; and to quiet me by a Condemnation of my Discontent, or by
promoting Redress—according to the Verdict of that sound Judgement to which I now submit
myself.
Be so good as to allow me to present my respectful Love to your Lady, and to think me continuing devotedly / Sir / Your obedient / Friend & Humble / Servant
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “The Vice President / of the United States / His
Excellency / John Adams Esqr / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Mr Lovel”; notation by Lovell: “favd by / Majr Genl. Lincoln”; and by
CFA: “Jany 22d
1791.”
Lovell also wrote to Elbridge Gerry on 22 Jan., complaining that
personal connections between members of Congress and those applying for jobs in the
revenue service meant that Gerry and his colleagues were biased enforcers of the
Collection Act. He wrote: “As there are 67 Collectors 54 Surveyors and but 13 Naval
Officers it is evident how the Proportion of Relations
Friends and Patrons will naturally stand in the Great Assembly.” Lovell trained his criticism on
appointments made for the ports of Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newburyport, and Salem,
Mass., where, he observed, “Rivalry & Heart-burnings” for federal posts dominated
local politics. Equally troubling, in Lovell’s view, was the hazy status of officers’
duties, their annual salaries, and their treatment of emoluments (
First Fed.
Cong.
, 21:494–497).