Papers of John Adams, volume 20
As the Citizens of these States, are all Legislators, or Creators
of Legislators, it is, as you observe in your favour of the 20th., necessary that Government Should be well understood by them. it is
necessary too that We Should understand it alike. That We should all agree in
Principles, and the essential Parts of Systems. to this end it is necessary that We
understand each others Language, and agree in the definitions of Terms, especially Words
of Art. if We do not, our Intercourse with each other, will be a Series of political
fraud. for Example. The Constitution, Art. 4. Sect. 4. Says “The United States Shall
guarantee, to every State in this Union, a Republican form of Government.” in order to
determine, what is the meaning of the Word Republican, We must enquire what is a
Republick? Look into Entick’s or Perry’s dictionary.1 They define it “a Commonwealth without a King”—
Look into Johnson and Sherridan. They define it “A State, in which the Power is lodged
in more than one.[”]— The Readers of Entick, will therefore understand that the
Constitution renders it their Duty to be King killers— The Readers of Johnson, will
understand that the Constitution has guaranteed to them the Rights of their Ancestors,
and the Solid Blessings of English Liberty. Is this Government, my Friend? or is it
Paper Money? Is it thus that We are to cheat or be cheated? Let Us take a little pains
to understand one another, and then to make ourselves understood by the People.— You and
I, will never be reproached, by the People that We have deceived them. The Definition of
Entick and Perry, is as ignorant as the pedantical Schoolmasters who made it.— All
Writers ancient and modern from Plato and Aristotle, all Courts present and 102 passed—all the Universities of the World, are against them.— all these Authorities
have ever agreed, that Lacedemon was a Republic, tho it had, for Seven hundred Years,
hereditary Kings: that Poland is a Republic, tho it has a King: and that England is a
Republick tho it has hereditary Kings.
But, Sir, are Words to be abused in this manner? if our popular
Government is to be conducted by the Abuse of Words We are
undone.— The vicious Part of the Community, will avail itself of this Instrument of
Government, more than the Virtuous. Are We, employing another Abuse of Words in the Name President.? Are Americans So Simple, as to be amused
with a Name.? The Prince of orange Said to me, in March 1788 “Sir You are going to have
a King under, the Title of President.”2
This Princes Judgment, upon this Occasion, would be approved by Sidney and Harrington,
Cicero and Livy, Plato and Aristotle, every one of whom, upon reading our Constitution
would pronounce the President, a King—3
Dft (Adams Papers); docketed by JA: “Republicks.”
William Perry, Royal Standard English
Dictionary, Worcester, Mass., 1788.
For JA’s final audience at The Hague with William V, on 7 March 1788, see vol. 19:284–285.
JA never sent this Dft, likely opting to continue the conversation when he dined with Sherman on 28 Aug. 1789 (Sherman to JA, 21 Aug., MHi:Adams-Hull Coll.).