Papers of John Adams, volume 18
Dr White has been So obliging to me, as to take with him to America, two Volumes, one for your Excellency and one for the Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, of a Production of mine, Suggested by the late popular Phrensy in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. It contains my Confession of political Faith, and if it is Heresy, I shall I Suppose be cast out of Communion. But it is the only Sense, in which I am or ever was a Republican, and in Such Times I hold concealment of Sentiments to be no better than countenancing Sedition.— Let me beg your Excellencys Acceptance of one Volume, and that you would present the other to the Philosophical Society, with my respectfull Thanks for the Volume of their Transactions, transmitted me by your Excellency in their Name.— That Work is in good Reputation here.
Mr Dilly has often requested me to mention to your Excellency, his great desire of publishing a new Edition of your Works, and a Sketch of your Life. and his Inclination is much quickened Since he learnt that you had been advised to write it, with your own Hand. inclosed is a Note which I received from him this morning.1 Mr Dilly is as honest a Man as any of the trade here, and as much esteemed by Men of Letters, so that, I believe you may depend upon his honour and skill. My Regards to Mr Franklin and / Mr Beach,2 if you please. with great / Respect I have the honour to be, sir, your / most obedient & humble servant
RC (PPAmP:Franklin Papers); internal address: “His Excellency / Dr Franklin.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 113.
The note from the London bookseller Charles Dilly has not been found, but Franklin indicated in his 18 May reply to JA that he would “write soon to Mr Dilly” (Adams Papers). Dilly subsequently printed Philosophical and Miscellaneous Papers: Lately Written by B. Franklin (London, 1787).
JA refers to Franklin’s grandsons William Temple Franklin and Benjamin Franklin Bache.
r.square
y.27. 1787.
I have received with pleasure your obliging Letter of the 24 of october and am much affected with the disagreable State of things in the Massachusetts— It is indeed news to me that there is any such 564 fixed determination as you mention in the minds of men of greatest Influence. Perhaps I am not a proper confident of those Gentlemen, As to my comeing home it is not possible for me to come home with decency untill next year, at the expiration of my Commission, which will be in about 12 months, then I shall come home of course— I wish with all my heart I were now in Boston, or to embark for that town to-morrow, not that I give full credit to your sanguine partiality to me in supposing that I shall be Chosen first Magisrate—Nor that I think it an eligible situation in such times, or that my health or other Qualifications would enable me to sustain the Weight of it, with dignity at any time— Indeed I doubt whether my sentiments of Government are agreable to the Majority of our state, and I am not enough of an accomodating disposition, to give up or conceal sentiments that I think of Consequence for the sake of Places, The Commotions in New England allarmed me so much that I have thrown together some hasty speculations upon the subject of Government which you will soon see— If the general spirit of those papers is not approved in our Country, my Career in political Life, will be very short—
I see by some news papers rec’d to day that you have distinguished yourself in support of the Laws in a manner that does you great honour & will not soon be forgotten—1 I begin to suspect that some Gentlemen who had more Zeal than Knowledge in the year 1770. will soon discover that I had good Policy as well as sound Law on my side when I ventured to lay open before our People the Laws against Riots, Routs & unlawful assemblies—mobs will never do–to govern states or command armies—2 I was as sensible of it in 70. as I am in 87—to talk of Liberty in such a state of things– Is not a Shattuck & a Chase3 as great a Tyrant, when he would pluck up Law & Justice by the roots, as a Bernard or a Hutchinson when he would overturn them partially? you see I have not forgotten old stories any more than you— I am sorry however that you recollect the old affair of the Letters in which I ever believed you as innocent as myself and more so too—4 I had long since forgotten it or at least all unpleasant feelings occasioned by it— Altho those Letters gave offence to some Men whom I alway’s esteemed—there were other sentiments in them which contributed to apprize the Continent early of what I was about & to prepare their minds for it— Those Letters are the first Monument extant of the Immortally glorious Project of Independence— Instead of blushing at them altogether, I Glory in 565 them & so will my Grand Child that I hope to see next spring—5 You will oblige me much sir by any Communications you can spare the time to make me
Yours
LbC in WSS’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Colonel Hitchbourne”; APM Reel 113.
The newspapers have not been identified but likely reported on the cavalry raid led by Hichborn, for which see Hichborn’s 16 Jan. letter, note 2, above.
JA presumably refers to the 1770 Boston Massacre trials where he argued that the British soldiers were justified in defending themselves because the people confronting them were engaged in a riot and unlawful assembly. See, for example, his argument in Rex v. Wemms (JA, Legal Papers
, 3:242–270) and his comment in his autobiography that his purpose was to lay before the jury “the Law as it stood that the[y] might be fully apprized of the Dangers of various kinds, which must arise from intemperate heats and irregular commotions” (JA, D&A
, 3:296).
By “Chase,” JA meant Daniel Shays.
See note 1 to Hichborn’s 24 Oct. 1786 letter, above.
JA became a grandfather on 2 April 1787, when AA2 gave birth to a son, William Steuben Smith, at the American legation in Grosvenor Square.