Papers of John Adams, volume 18

225 From John Adams to Edward Augustus Holyoke, 3 April 1786 Adams, John Holyoke, Edward Augustus

To Edward Augustus Holyoke

Sir Grosvenor Square April 3. 1786 London

I now do myself the Honour of inclosing to you, as President of the Medical Society, the original Letters of Monsieur De Lassone Monsieur Geoffroy and Monsieur Vicq D’Azyr Copies of which I Suppose have been before recd.— The Vote of the Royal Society of Medicine in Parchment authenticated by its Officers is also inclosed, and a Journal.1

I received in due Season your Letter, inclosing a Vote of the Medical Society,2 both of which do me great honour. I ought to make my Apology for not answering that Letter, and for not transmitting these original Papers, sooner: but many Removals of my Papers and my Family with various Calls of public Service, have been the real cause.

With my best Respects to the Medical Society / and the most Sincere Wishes for their Pros / perity, I beg Leave to subscribe myself your / most obedient and obliged servant

John Adams.

RC (MaSaPEM:Holyoke Family Coll.); internal address: “Edward Augustus Holyoke Esqr / President of the Medical society.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 113.

Since 1782 JA had facilitated a correspondence between the newly formed Massachusetts Medical Society and the Société royale de médecine at Paris. With this letter, JA resolved a query raised by Charles Storer in his of 23 Nov. 1785. The society’s receipt of published scientific research from Paris had been so slow, Storer wrote, that members worried “it has been stopped” (vol. 17:597, 598, 604, 605).

Vol. 15:349, 350.

From John Adams to Joel Barlow, 4 April 1786 Adams, John Barlow, Joel

To Joel Barlow

Sir. Grosvenor square April 4th. 1786—

I am much obliged to you for your favour of December 12th. 1785, and for the oppertunity of reading the vision of Columbus a Poem of very great Merit— as soon as I had read it, I went out with it to my friend Dr. Price at Newington Green, and left it with him, together with your Letter to him— The Doctor will do you every service in his Power & I will do what may be in mine.

As the English is very little read in any Country of Europe, except England, a Poem in that Language will never, or at least for many years to come make any fortune in any part of the World except England & America,— In French, if it had the same merit it would sell to some degree every where— I hope that you & your friends Dwight, Trumbull and Humphreys will contribute with other causes 226 to make our Language more generally Studied— But this must be the work of time— There is not extant a Poem, written by any Englishman now living, that will bear any Comparison, with the Vision of Columbus, or the Conquest of Canaan— There is indeed no very eminent Poet on the stage— Sherriden, Anstey Mason, Hayley, Day1 & some others have written some things well. As Day & Hayley have been rather favourable to America, it may be proper to consult one of them—

The Dedication to the King of France, will do it honour in that Kingdom but not in this— It is even questionable whether it would not ruin the sale of it here where alone it can be sold at all, very few Copies will ever be disposed of in france, or any other part of Europe, at least for many years to come. You must consider that the public opinion here is very different from that in America— This Nation is & ever has been profoundly Ignorant of what has happened in America, and all the Channels of information are so stopped up by Influence & Power, that it is utterly impossible to convey the truth to their minds.

There are some Expressions in the Vision of Columbus which would be adjudged libellous by any Court & Jury in the Kingdom: And the Attorney General, ex officio would think himself bound to prosecute the Printer & Publisher for Example in what you say of Adams, whether you mean John or Samuel, I know not: but as it is left doubtfull it will be here applyed to me, and as I am the public Minister from the U. States here, if I were to be instrumental, or only accessory to the Publication of it for what I know it might produce a Declaration of War. “From all the tyrants guileful plotts the Veil he drew”2 I have taken the liberty to write guileful, instead of Tyrants, a Word that never has been tolerated in England They never dared even to publish the declaration of Independance without gutting it— The Poem must be revised by somebody who will determine what Corrections of this Sort are indispensable for no Printer will run the risk of a Pillory & Imprisonment for the sake of publishing a Poem that notwithstanding its beauty, harmony & Sublimity, too probably will have a dull sale. Neither America nor her Heroes nor her sages, are popular here, Much otherwise— The United States must encourage their own Poets, as well as Warriors— or they will be discouraged— all Europe is too Jealous of both to do this Duty for us—

You may depend however upon every thing in my power to do, 227 and when the Poem is printed, I will consult the Imperial Ambassadors here, to know if a Copy may be presented to each of their sovereigns, without offence.3 I shall be glad at any time to hear from you & am with great esteem / Yours

J A

LbC in WSS’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr. Joel Barlow—”; APM Reel 113.

JA’s “eminent” writers were: playwright and Stafford M.P. Richard Brinsley Sheridan (1751–1816), poet Christopher Anstey (1724–1805), writer and book collector George Mason (1735–1806), poet and biographer William Hayley (1745–1820), and Thomas Day (1748–1789), author and friend of Henry Laurens and John Laurens.

An 1823 London edition of Poems and Plays by William Hayley is in JQA’s library at MQA. A copy of Day’s Reflexions upon the Present State of England, and the Independence of America, London, 1782, is in JA’s library at MB. But Day, who wrote several poems honoring John Laurens after his death in 1782, is perhaps best known for his authorship, with John Laurens Bicknell (1746–1787), of the abolitionist poem The Dying Negro, London, 1773 ( DNB; Catalogue of JA’s Library ; Catalog of the Stone Library; Laurens, Papers , 9:588).

The version of Vision of Columbus that Barlow sent to JA has not been found, but in the 1787 edition published in Hartford, Conn., Barlow adopted JA’s suggestion, for there the passage reads: “Adams, enraged, a broken charter bore, / And lawless acts of ministerial power; / Some injured right, in each loose leaf appears, / A king in terrors and a land in tears; / From all the guileful plots the veil he drew, / With eye retortive look’d creation thro’, / Oped the wide range of nature’s boundless plan, / Traced all the steps of liberty and man; / Crouds rose to vengeance while his accents rung, / And Independence thunder’d from his tongue” (p. 165).

Barlow sent copies of the published poem to JA on 14 June 1787, along with “drafts of letters to their Majisties to be covered if sent, otherwise to be burnt” (Adams Papers). As promised, JA forwarded the books and letters to Friedrich Graf von Kageneck Karl Emmerich Reviczky, Baron von Revisnie , the Austrian envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary to Great Britain, and to Count Semon Romanovich Vorontsov, the Russian minister, on 4 September. Describing the poem as a “Curiousity” to be “reckoned among the First Fruits of the Arts, in the United States of America,” JA cautioned that Barlow’s zealous depiction of revolutionary events, while “excellent,” also made him “very apprehensive” of its royal reception abroad (LbC’s, APM Reel 112; Repertorium , 3:76, 355).