Papers of John Adams, volume 18

From John Adams to Richard Cranch, 12 December 1785 Adams, John Cranch, Richard
To Richard Cranch
My dear Brother Grosvenor square Decr. 12th. 1785.1

I am much obliged to you for your judicious Letter of Octr. 15.2 you have described the Causes of the present Evil with Accuracy, and the Cure is equally obvious. I mean a partial Cure— as far as the difficulty arises from Property having been thrown by the Course of the War into Hands, unable to hold it, there is no remedy but time & the Course of Law, in this respect, the present times resemble the years 1763 & 4. immediately following the Peace with France & Spain— I remember there was then, great Complaints of hard times, and a remarkable multiplication of Law suits which subsided only by the shifting of Property from the Debtor to the Creditor— This alway’s, an unavoidable Effect of a Peace which throws numbers of Persons out of gainful Employments

In addition to this all the causes you enumerate have operated, since the Peace of 1783.— The Cure is very simple— let the trade be opened to the West Indies, Nova scotia, Canada and newfoundland— Let our oil & Bone & ships be received by the English as Remittances— this would relieve us at once— But in whose power is this? not in ours, But the british Governments, and if they had rather their own merchants and manufacturers who have traded to America, should be ruined and loose the Commerce of New England to the Nation, than open these sources of remittances, they have both the right & the Power

And this I believe to be the Principal & disposition of every Party & almost every Man, in the Legislative and Executive Departments of Goverment— the People in Power here, very well know, all the facts in your Letter— but a deadly malice is aimed deliberately at the Commerce, Population & Power especially at the Navigation of New England— and you may depend upon it you will never be relieved, 29 but upon this Principle, “If England dont receive their Remittances, France will”—

The french Comptroller General, has reduced the Duties upon our Oil to 7lv. 10s. a Barrique of 520 Weight, that is to 30 Livr. or 1 Louis ’dr. & 1/4. pr. ton imported in french or american ships— The difference between this Duty & the British Alien Duty which is 16£. 3s sterg is so great, that in my opinion you may sell all your Oil in france to advantage— Mr. Boylston has sold his whole Cargo there— Mr. Barrett is now at Paris,3 But in my opinion our merchants may send their Oil to France, to advantage without waiting for Contracts— But if they are so attached to England, that they will not, or so indebted that they dare not send any thing any where else, what can we say?—

Once for all, you may take it from me, that you must work out your own salvation at home— if you cannot find other Channels of Trade these will remain blocked up— When you have demonstrated to the World that you don’t want them, they will be opened but not before— I am informed that the Trade of Boston to the Cape of Good Hope & to Africa succeeds very Well, why has no attempt been made to China, Bengall or Pondichery or other parts of India—There have been very able Representations to me and others in Letters from Boston, & they have been made over & over again to the Ministery, by others as well as by me—by American merchants here too & west India merchants & Planters, but all to no Purpose as yet, since the signature of the Treaty of defensive alliance, between France & Holland, indeed, the Nation seems a little startled & Gentlemen begin in Conversation to wonder that Ministry dont think a little about the U.S. & begin to say that from our Climates soil &c We must increase fast & become important in Commerce & Politicks to this Country— You observe they dont allow us to be yet of any Consequence— In such a Delusion is this Nation still— My Love to sister & the Children, my duty to my aged, honourd & beloved Mother, whom I still hope to see— Yours

J A—

LbC in WSS’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Honb. Richard Cranch Esqr.”; APM Reel 113.

1.

This is the first letter entered in Lb/JA/25. For JA and his Letterbooks, see Introduction, Part 4, above.

2.

This letter was of 13 rather than 15 Oct. (vol. 17:505–510). There Cranch reviewed the economic problems facing Massachusetts that would form the basis for the popular grievances resulting in Shays’ Rebellion. In his reply JA attributes the difficulties to the aftermath of the Revolution, a situation that he saw as little different from that in the years after the Seven Years’ War. In a 30 April 1786 letter, James Warren provided a similar analysis of the economic issues facing 30 the commonwealth, and JA’s 4 July reply was much the same as that to Cranch, both below.

3.

The information provided here concerning the reduction in French duties on whale oil and the efforts of Thomas Boylston and Nathaniel Barrett to sell it in France was probably obtained from the Marquis de Lafayette’s 30 Nov. 1785 letter, not found, for which see JA’s 13 Dec. letter to Lafayette, and note 1, below.

From John Adams to James Warren, 12 December 1785 Adams, John Warren, James
To James Warren
Dear Sir Grosvenor Square Decr 12. 1785

Your Favour of October 6. I recd but Yesterday.— I had before written very fully to Mr Jay, a recommendation of your son to be Consull at Lisbon, and desired him to communicate it to the Members of Congress. I will write also to Mr Jefferson, and wish very heartily that he may be appointed.1 He is a modest and ingenious Man, and independently of the Merits of his Family, which are equal to any I know, his Pretensions personal are better than any one in Competition that I have heard of. There is a Probability of a Treaty with Portugal, but these Negotiations are so slow and capricious that I can never depend upon any Thing till it is signed and sealed. I will forward the Letter inclosed as I have before, to Winslow, in the Dispatches of the Chevalier De Pinto the Portuguese Minister, with whom I have the Pleasure of an agreable Acquaintance.2 He is a Man of Merit and offers me every civility in his Power. The Danger of the Letters being opened will be less in this Way than by the Post or any other Conveyance in my Power.

I admire the Spirit of the Massachusetts Navigation Act but cannot pretend to judge of the Ability of the State to Support it.— It is thought by many that it would be better to confine it to British ships and Goods, or to those Nations who have no Treaty of Commerce with Us.— The French Ordinance giving a Bounty of ten Livres a Quintal upon Fish of the French Fishery imported into their own Islands, or sold in the Marketts of Spain, Portugal or Italy, and laying a Duty of five Livres upon foreign Fish in their Islands is suspected to be in Retaliation, for our Navigation Act.3 I dont know whether it is good Policy to begin a commercial Conflict with commercial nations with whom We have Treaties, if it is possible to distinguish between their Goods & British as no doubt it is between their ships.

Mr Boylston, took Passage in his own ship for France and has there sold here Cargo. Mr Barrett is arrived there, and I hope they will be able to open the Trade in that Article.— What the British Ministry will do, I know not and cannot expect to know till the 31 session of Parliament. If they can Support their own Sperma Cæti Fishery and We cannot find a Markett in France, they will continue the high duty.—

The Agents are gone, to Madrid, in their Way to Algiers. I have a Letter from one of them at Bayonne.4

With great Regard your Friend & / sert

John Adams

RC (MB); internal address: “General Warren.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 113.

1.

Although JA refers only to James Warren’s 6 Oct. letter, he also is replying to the letters of 4 and [ca. 4] Sept. from James and Mercy Otis Warren, respectively (vol. 17:395–400, 499–500). Those letters were received on or about 3 Dec., the day on which JA wrote to John Jay (second letter), above, regarding Winslow Warren’s appointment as consul at Lisbon, a matter Mercy had raised in her letter. For JA’s 13 Dec. letter to Thomas Jefferson on Winslow’s behalf, see below.

2.

The letter forwarded by JA to Winslow at Lisbon with the dispatches of Luiz Pinto de Balsamão, Portuguese minister to Britain, was that enclosed by Mercy Otis Warren with her [ca. 4] Sept. letter. JA wrote to the younger Warren on 3 Dec. (LbC, APM Reel 111), enclosing that letter and indicating that he had written to “Mr Jay, recommending you to be Consul at Lisbon.”

3.

For the substance of the 18 Sept. arrêt and JA’s opinion of it when he first learned of it on 3 Nov., see vol. 17:564–565.

4.

These are John Lamb and his secretary, Paul R. Randall, who reached Madrid by 10 Dec. The letter was Randall’s 18 Nov. letter from Bayonne, France (same, 17:585–586).