Papers of John Adams, volume 16

Joseph Reed to John Adams, 21 February 1784 Reed, Joseph Adams, John
From Joseph Reed
Dear Sir London Feb. 21st. 1784.

I was duly honoured with your Favour of the 11th. Instt. which I communicated to Dr. Witherspoon who joins me in reciprocating every Mark of your polite & friendly Attention, & in expressing our very cordial Acknowledgments—

The Establishment of our Funds in America tho long delayed & occasionally interrupted will I flatter myself take Place this Winter, at least so far as to establish the Impost by Authority of Congress 50 confirm’d by the States. How far the Revenue will be faithfully collected & the Laws duly executed remains to be seen. Having found so much Difficulty to check the Intercourse with the British during the War, it is to be feared the Spirit of Smuggling too much predominates in America & that a Competition for the Trade between different States may enfeeble the Collection: As a sumptuary Regulation it would now be very beneficial to the Country for I am sorry to say, my dear Sir, the Appetite for European & especially British Manufactures & Imports is much too strong for our weak Digestion. We neither want, nor can we pay for the Quantitis which this Kingdom is pouring forth in the most lavish Profusion. In this View the Suspension of our European Credit may not be so great a Misfortune as may be apprehended.— The Goodwill of G. Brittain seems to be manifested to America in no other Mode than giving her an unlimited Credit from which I fear both Countries will suffer, there it will check Industry & promote Dissipation & end in Loss & Complaint here. The Morality of America & the Education on which it must be founded have not yet gained that Vigour, which we could wish. The best regulated Armies are poor Schools for moral Virtue. Our Officers are scattered over the whole Country & will of course influence its Manners in a considerable Degree. Their Virtues tho great, are of a different Species; it is impossible to say too much of their Perseverance Patience & Bravery. They have created an Order among themselves which has occasioned a Variety of Sentiment we hope in this Instance Virtues & Ribbons may be inseparably blended.—

With Respect to a Commission for negotiating a Treaty of Commerce with this Kingdom Dr. Witherspoon & myself both think it was the general Opinion there, that what has been sent as Instructions, connected with former Powers was sufficient; but as to my own Part it was only a general Idea taken up in Conversation the Subject having never been spoke of authoritativly.—1

The little Observation I have made in this City affords but very faint Hopes of removing any Prejudices against America, if my own Abilities were much more equal to such a Task; they seem to labour under the insuperable Curse of never profiting by Experience in any Thing which respects that Country. There must be a Capacity to receive Information & a Spirit to improve it before they learn their true Interest. I confess I find myself most disappointed & deceived in my Opinion of their conciliating Spirit. There is certainly a very great Fund of Bitterness towards America to be done away, before 51 we can meet with a general Cordiality. Most of the Gentlemen of America are returning thither with these Sentiments & will discourage the Intercourse.— If it is not improper I should be happy to learn what Prospect there is of the Payment of Mr. Morris’s Bills— At least I hope you will excuse my Freedom, when I add that a Motive beyond Curiosity influences me—. By Letters just received from America I find that on the 18th. Decemr. Congress made up 6 States,2 & single Members from others so as to expect a Congress to form immediately If any Thing important should occur I shall have great Pleasure in communicating it & shall be extremely happy to be honoured with your occasional Favours. As I am with very great Respect & equal Esteem Dr. Sir, / Your most Obed. & very Hble Servt.

Jos. Reed

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mr Reed. Feb. 21. 1784.”

1.

Presumably Congress’ instructions of 29 Oct. 1783 (vol. 15:329, 331–334).

2.

Not until 14 Jan. 1784 did Congress have a quorum of nine members, the number necessary to ratify the Anglo-American definitive peace treaty (vol. 15:455).

John Adams to Antoine Marie Cerisier, 22 February 1784 Adams, John Cerisier, Antoine Marie
To Antoine Marie Cerisier
Sir The Hague Feby: 22. 1784.

I thank you for your Favour, of the 21st: and for the Communication of the Letter from my Friend the Abby de Mably. I am very Sensible of his Partiality for a Man, who he thinks has contributed, from virtuous Principles, to a great Event. his Approbation is the more precious, to me as I know his Principles to be pure, and his Spirit independent. You may be Sure my Advice to you will be, to write your Preface, because I love to read your Compositions always, for the same Reason.1 But take care to caution your Readers against an implicit Adoption of the Sentiments of any Writer, how great so ever his Name may be, or how justly so ever his Writings in general may be esteemed. It is with great Pleasure, that I see the Pens, of a De Mably, a Raynal, a Cerisier, a Price, turned to the Subject of Government. I wish the Thoughts of all Academies in Europe, engaged on the same Theme, because I really think that the Science of Society, is much behind other Arts and Sciences Trades, and Manufactures. The noblest of all Knowledge, is the least general, and that a general Spirit of Inquiry, would produce ameliorations in the Administrations of every Government in every form. I have read with Pleasure, the Dissertation of the Baron de 52 Hertzberg in the Academy of Berlin, on the 29 of last month, not because I am of his Opinion, but because the Example of a Minister of State & an Academician will probably be followed.2

Mr: Van den Corput’s Observation upon the Plan of a Loan seems to merit Attention, but I must leave it to the three Houses, in whose Experience & Judgment I confide3

I return you our Friend’s Letter, and hope soon to see his Book.

With much Esteem &c

LbC in JQA’s hand (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mr: A. M. Cerisier.”; APM Reel 107.

1.

Despite JA’s approval, Cerisier did not write the preface to the Dutch edition of Mably’s Observations sur le gouvernement et les loix des États-Unis d’Amérique, for which see Cerisier’s letter of 21 Feb., and note 2, above. The Dutch edition attributes the preface to the translator of the 1784 English edition published at Amsterdam, probably the Rev. Benjamin Choyce Sowden, for whom see JA’s 27 July letter to Benjamin Franklin and Franklin’s reply of 6 Aug., both below, and Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 6, above.

2.

JA refers to Ewald Friedrich von Hertzberg’s dissertation Sur la forme des gouvernemens, et quelle en est la meilleure?, [Berlin?], 1784, presented before the Berlin Academy on 29 Jan. in celebration of Frederick II’s birth. Hertzberg was Frederick’s foreign minister. In referring to Hertzberg’s presentation in the Defence of the Const., JA noted that fact and observed that it was to be expected that the Prussian minister would “show the advantages of simple monarchy over all kinds of republican governments, even that best species of them, limited monarchies” and that none of the “academicians” hearing the address was prepared to dispute his conclusion (JA, Defence of the Const. , 1:324).

3.

See JA’s 23 Feb. letter to the consortium, below.