Papers of John Adams, volume 14
je me propose d’aller à Versailles dans Le Cours de la semaine prochaine. je Chercherai de nouveau la traduction des Prior Documents que je n’ai point trouvée chés Mr Pissot.1 je m’émpresserai de 208vous La remettre aussitôt que je me la serai procurée. je vous Prie d’être persuadé du desir que j’aurai toujours de Concourir à vos vues; et je m’éstimerai heureux de pouvoir par là meriter votre Confiance.
Je Suis avec un Profond respect / Monsieur / Votre très humble et / très obéissant serviteur
Translation
I propose going to Versailles at some point next week. I shall make another search for the translation of “Prior Documents,” which I did not find at Mr. Pissot's.1 I shall hasten to send it to you as soon as I have obtained a copy. I pray that you will be persuaded of the desire that I have always to concur with your views and shall consider myself happy if I can thus deserve your trust.
I am with profound respect, sir, your very humble and very obedient servant
RC (Adams Papers).
Addenet, who had served JA as a translator, was apparently looking for a French translation of John Almon's A Collection of Interesting, Authentic Papers, Relative to the Dispute between Great Britain and America; Shewing the Causes and Progress of that Misunderstanding, from 1764 to 1775, London, 1777. Usually referred to as “Prior Documents,” it was a supplement to Almon's The Remembrancer, but no translation has been found (vol. 9:412;
Catalogue of JA's Library
). Pissot was a Paris bookseller from whom JA had bought books in the past (JA, D&A
, 2:437).
e.Janv
r.1783.
La maniere subite & imprévue dont on a reçu ici la nouvelle de la signature des Préliminaires par toutes les autres Puissances belligérentes, sans que celui qui tient le plus à coeur ici ait été fixé, a d’abord consterné nos Amis;1 mais après être revenus de leur premiere Surprise, Mr. Van Berkel, à la requisition & Sur les instances de Mr. le Grand-Pensionaire, dans une conférence secrete, a proposé un moyen, Sans doute le plus noble & le plus solide, pour parvenir au but desiré & desirable à tous. Mr. le Gd. Pre. l’a Saisi avec empressement; & l’on est convenu, que Mr. Van Berkel me prieroit de leur part, de consulter Votre Excellence en toute diligence sur ce moyen, que voici:
“Pour accélérer la Négociation de la paix générale, & pour prévenir les discussions ultérieures entre L. H. P. & la Grande Bretagne 209sur le point de la Navigation libre & illimitée, on demande à Mr. Adams, s’il se trouve assez autorisé de la part du Congrès, pour accéder au Traité de la Neutralité armée déjà conclu entre quelques Puissances belligérentes de l’Europe, ou pour entrer dans une pareille Négociation avec l’Espagne, la France, & les Pays-Bas Unis?”
“Dans l’un & l’autre cas, L. H. Puissances pourroient faire la même proposition à la France & à l’Espagne, afin de prévenir les discussions sur le point de la Liberté des mers, qui pourroient arrêter la paix générale; & pour mettre la République en état de faire sa paix avec la Grande-Bretagne, qui pourroit être retardée par des difficultés que pourroient rencontrer des stipulations particulieres, ou des arrangemens à faire avec l’Angleterre sur ce point.”
“Le Traité définitif entre l’Angleterre & la République pourroit alors se faire sous la Réserve du Droit primitif de toutes les Nations, qui se trouvent dans l’exercice de ce Droit, à moins qu’ils ne s’en soient départis par des Traités particuliers au sujet de Contrebandes reconnues pour telles par les Contractants respectifs.”2
“Mr. Adams est prié instam̃ent, de communiquer ses idées sur ce point le plutôt possible, & d’y ajouter ses réflexions sur les moyens d’avancer une telle Négociation & d’acheminer la paix générale.3 Car il paroît, qu’en attendant, la république pourroit accéder à l’Armistice, qui devra résulter de la signature des préliminaires de paix entre les autres Puissances belligerentes, & traiter avec l’Angleterre sur tous les autres points en question.”
Vous êtes le Maître, Monsieur, Si vous le jugez à propos, de conférer aussi là-dessus ministériellement avec Mr. Brantzen.
Il ne me reste plus, que de vous présenter les complimens & tout ce qui se peut penser de plus cordial de la part de Mr. Van Berkel qui vient de me quitter, pour me laisser écrire tout ce que dessus. Je Suis avec un très grand respect, Monsieur, De Votre Excellence / le très humble & très obeissant / serviteur
Translation
The sudden and unexpected news that the preliminaries had been signed by all the other belligerent powers, but without the point deemed here most essential having been settled, initially alarmed our friends.1 But after they had recovered from their surprise, Mr. Van Berckel, at the request and urging of the grand pensionary and in a secret meeting, proposed a means, doubtless the noblest and most solid, by which to attain an end desired by and desirable to all. The grand pensionary embraced it 210eagerly, and it was agreed that Mr. Van Berckel would ask me to consult your excellency with all possible speed on their behalf. Here is the text of the proposal:
“To hasten the negotiation of a general peace, and to avoid further discussions between their High Mightinesses and Great Britain on the matter of free and unlimited navigation, we ask Mr. Adams if he is authorized by Congress to accede to the Treaty of Armed Neutrality already concluded between some European belligerent powers, or to enter into a parallel negotiation with Spain, France, and the Netherlands?
“In either case, their High Mightinesses could make the same proposal to France and Spain in order to forestall discussions on the point of freedom of the seas, which would impede the general peace; and place the republic in the position of making its peace with Great Britain, which would be delayed by difficulties that would be encountered from the particular stipulations or arrangements to be made with England on this point.
“The definitive treaty between England and the Republic could then be made contingent upon the customary law of all nations that find through the exercise of this law the means to depart from it by particular treaties on the subject of contraband goods recognized as such by the respective contracting parties.2
“Mr. Adams is asked to communicate his ideas on this point as soon as possible; and also his thoughts on how best to further such a negotiation and bring about a general peace.3 For it seems that in the meantime the Republic could accede to the Armistice, which must necessarily result from the signature of preliminary peace accords between the other belligerent powers, and treat with England on all the other points in question.”
You are at liberty, sir, if you judge it appropriate, to confer on the matter, ministerially, with Mr. Brantsen.
The only remaining task is to present the compliments and most cordial sentiments of Mr. Van Berckel, who has just left me, so that I could write the above. I am with great respect, sir, your excellency's very humble and very obedient servant
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Paris à Son Exce. Mr. Adams Min. Plenipo: des Etats- / Unis.”
That is, Great Britain's 20 Jan. signing of preliminary treaties with France and Spain but not the Netherlands. Despite the lack of a preliminary Anglo-Dutch treaty, which would not be signed until Sept. 1783, the Dutch were included under the terms of the armistice concluded on 20 Jan., for which see the British and American proclamations of 14 and 20 Feb., respectively, both below. For the signing of the preliminaries, the armistice, and JA's comments on the status of Anglo-Dutch peace negotiations, see his 22 Jan. letter to Robert R. Livingston, above. For the increasingly bitter reaction of Dumas’ Dutch friends toward France, the Comte de Vergennes, and even the Duc de La Vauguyon for failing to support the Netherlands in peace negotiations with Great Britain and thereby precluding it from signing a preliminary treaty at the same time as the other belligerents, see Dumas’ letters of 28 and 30 Jan. and 4 Feb., all below.
The third and fourth instructions to the Dutch peace negotiators required them to obtain from Britain an unequivocal acknowledgment of the right of the Netherlands to 211base its neutrality on the terms of Catherine II's 28 Feb. 1780 Declaration of Armed Neutrality and assurances that Britain would no longer consider naval stores to be contraband (vol. 13:246–247). In offering this proposal, Van Berckel, the grand pensionary, and the others involved recognized that Great Britain would never agree to a treaty incorporating the substance of those instructions. Therefore, in their proposal to JA, the Dutch sought to finesse their way around the instructions by having all of the belligerents except Britain formally accede by treaty to the principles of the Armed Neutrality, including the exclusion of naval stores from list of goods considered contraband. The treaty would be part of the stipulative law of nations rather than the customary law of nations that Britain adhered to insofar as the rights of neutrals and contraband were concerned. By doing so, the Dutch could save face by claiming that, with the sole exception of Britain, the principles of the Armed Neutrality had become the universal law of all nations and therefore the principal objectives of their war with Great Britain had been achieved. For the difference between the conventional or stipulative law of nations and the customary law, see Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations; or, the Principles of Natural Law, London, 1759–1760, introduction, sects. 24–25.
For the response of JA and his fellow peace commissioners, see his reply of 29 Jan., below.