Papers of John Adams, volume 7

Benjamin Franklin and John Adams to J. D. Schweighauser, 10 February 1779 Franklin, Benjamin JA Schweighauser, John Daniel

1779-02-10

Benjamin Franklin and John Adams to J. D. Schweighauser, 10 February 1779 Franklin, Benjamin Adams, John Schweighauser, John Daniel
Benjamin Franklin and John Adams to J. D. Schweighauser
Sir Passy feby 10 1779

Capt. Jones has represented to us his Desire and Intention of returning to the Countess of Selkirk, some Plate which his People took from her house.1

We apprehend that Congress would not disapprove of this Measure, as far as it should depend upon them; and We therefore consent on the Part of the United States that this Plate should be return'd. This Consent is to be understood to extend no farther than to the share to which the U.S. may be suppos'd to have a Claim. The Claim of the Officers and Men, Cap. Jones must be responsible to them for. This Plate in the whole is represented to be worth about 100 Guineas.2

LbC in the hand of William Temple Franklin (Adams Papers).

1.

The Selkirk plate had been taken on 23 April 1778, when Jones raided St. Mary's Isle on the coast of Scotland during the Ranger's expedition in the Irish Sea. For an account of the raid, see Jones to the Commissioners, 27 May 1778, and note 1 (vol. 6:159–167). Jones' offer to return the silver, made in a letter to the Countess of Selkirk, dated 8 May 1778, was rejected by the Earl of Selkirk in a letter of 9 June to Jones, which he never received (Morison, John Paul Jones , p. 148–150, 151–154). When Benjamin Franklin learned of the contents of the Earl's letter, he informed Jones, in a letter of 24 Feb., that the booty would not be accepted if it came from his hands (Wharton, ed., Dipl. Corr. Amer. Rev. , 3:61). The affair ended when, after the war and at considerable expense to himself, Jones successfully returned the plate (Morison, John Paul Jones , p. 154–155).

2.

At the bottom of his letterbook copy of this letter, Arthur Lee wrote: “not signd by A. Lee” (PCC, No. 102, IV, f. 152).