Papers of John Adams, volume 7

The Commissioners to C. W. F. Dumas

C. W. F. Dumas to the Commissioners

The Commissioners to John Ross?, 9 September 1778 Franklin, Benjamin Lee, Arthur JA First Joint Commission at Paris Ross, John

1778-09-09

The Commissioners to John Ross?, 9 September 1778 Franklin, Benjamin Lee, Arthur Adams, John First Joint Commission at Paris Ross, John
The Commissioners to John Ross?
Sir Passi September 9. 1778

Yours of the 29 of August1 We duely received. We return you the Contract inclosed in it.

We are neither instructed nor authorised, to discharge your Debts, whether contracted in a private Capacity or otherwise, and if We were, our Finances would not enable Us to do it, at present.2 In one of your Letters you Say you have certain Merchandises on Hand to ship to America, which you will not ship untill you have our orders. If you had told Us that these Goods were purchased with the Money which the Commissioners sent you and had given Us an Account as We demanded, We should have done what would have appeared to Us proper, in that Business. But as it is, We can give no orders. If you have any Goods, by you belonging to the United States, We wish you to deliver them to Mr. Schweighauser, who will send them to America, as soon as We shall order it to be done, nor Advice. You must do your own Business.

17

We take no Notice of the manner in which We have been treated by you in refusing to account to Us, for a very large sum of Money which was intrusted to you by the Commissioners, and in several Letters. We leave it to you to revise your Letter Book, reconsider your Conduct and follow the Dictates of your Conscience: but We expect it as a favour that We may be troubled with no more of your Letters, unless they are better adapted to your Character and to ours, and to the public service of our Country. We are, with all due Respect, your, humble servants.

LbC (Adams Papers); notation: “not sent.” The portions of this letter in double angle brackets were canceled before those in single angle brackets.

1.

No letter of 29 Aug. has been found that would seem to warrant this response. However, it is probable that John Ross, a merchant at Nantes with whom the Commissioners had a long-standing dispute over accounts and other matters, was the intended recipient (see, for example, Commissioners to Ross, 13 April, vol. 6:28–29, calendar entry; JA, Diary and Autobiography , 4:50–51). In addition, the Commissioners' letter to Ross of 30 Sept. (below) states that they are returning a contract that Ross had sent them in an earlier, unidentified letter.

2.

The remainder of this paragraph was written after the closing and marked for insertion here. It was apparently intended as an alternative to the original final paragraph, which had been canceled.