Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch

Abigail Adams to Cotton Tufts

Abigail Adams to William Smith, 29 June 1798 Adams, Abigail Smith, William
Abigail Adams to William Smith
Dear sir June 29 1798

I have this moment received your Letter of June 25th.1 I wrote to you by the post of twesday, and told you that from a Letter received from mr Adams I thought it would be impractable for Thomas Welch to go out.2 I now inclose you the Letter and you must judge what is best to be done mr Adams will undoubtedly give Thomas his Board if he goes but you see the expences of his going to him, and of his return must be from the Sum allowd. mr Adams finds the court of Berlin so expensive that with the utmost oeconomy he can but just Live within his means. The President says if Thomas and his Friends conclude, that it will do for him to embark upon those terms, the sooner he goes the better. if he should think the terms inadequate, the President says he will make him midshipman on Board Captain Sever, or any other vessel, or give him a commission 164 in the Army if he raises one. he will leave it optional with him. I wrote you on twesday respecting the Loan office and am happy to find that you think in the same manner The President considers himself as trustee for the publick, and his conscience responsible for the Charge committed to him. he yesterday conquerd all his own personal feelings and inclinations in an appointment of collecter of this port. the most respectable & responsible Merchants came forward in favour of an upright honest Man a firm federilist, a good citizen, who from his connections & his misfortunes claimd every attention, and for whom the President felt his Heart greatly interested, but he dared not commit the publick interest into the Hands of a Man whose private affairs were desperate, tho he no ways in fault. accordingly the speaker of the House of Reps of this State was appointed, mr Latimer a Man in good circumstances, who did not need it, as a support but who is very respectable—3 it is an old Proverb, [“]Let the Shoemaker keep to his last” it would be well for many if it was more attended to—4 in his Professional Line the President will serve him when ever opportunity occurs—

You will write me the determination as soon as it is made—

it is really a fine way of fortune making, plundering ones own Countrymen. what an infernal scene of iniquity has been practised by the French & the wretches who have united with them. I do not doubt but many vessels have already gone out with these commissions. I was told a number were hurrying away from Nyork. the Prohibition should have taken place as soon as the Bill past, but it seems as tho it was deferd to give time to them to get away— they have Priviledged merchants here—and many of them are known—but we shall never be free from these intrigues untill the Treaties are declared void.5 this city is a fine Situation. the Blacks whites & Grays are come from the Islands, here, and be sure we must let them Land and take them into our Bosoms because they have fought for Britain, and they chose to come here, and really peter is advocating their admission, tho cursing incessently every Frenchman— Peter never shewd himself a more bigoted English-Man, yet there exists no authority to exclude them, or any others6 whilst the treaties are in force. by them they have a right to come. I do not know what will be done. they are bold dareing and Insolent I hear.

In short we must have more decision.

I mourn with you the heavy loss sustaind by the death of our worthy and excellent Friend Dr Belknap. at any period it would have been cause of regreet, but at this more particuliarly so. a Clark & 165 Belknap, are not the Growth of every Age— as Men of Learning Piety, pure and undefiled Religion Benevolence and Candour, I know not where can be found their equals.

all these things serve to wean us from the world & will lead our minds I hope to place our trust, not in Man, not in an Arm of flesh, but look to the great first cause, with Humble hope, and trembling pinions Soar to the first Good first Perfect and first fair.

Kind and affectionate Remembrance to mrs smith cousin Betsy & all our other Friends

From your &c

A Adams

RC (MHi:Smith-Carter Family Papers); addressed: “William Smith Esqr / Boston”; docketed: “A. Adams / June 1798—”

1.

In his letter of 25 June, Smith suggested that the publication of Talleyrand’s letter would expose the connection between the French and Democratic-Republicans in the United States. He also commented on Thomas Welsh’s financial situation and reported the election of Samuel Dexter to the U.S. Senate (Adams Papers).

2.

See AA to Smith, 26 June, and note 1, above.

3.

Among the recommendations JA received was a letter endorsing Israel Whelen to be collector of the district of Pennsylvania. Whelen (1752–1806) served in the military during the Revolutionary War despite being a Quaker and afterward was a Pennsylvania state senator and a member of the Pennsylvania Electoral College. French spoliations damaged his finances, and while JA did not nominate him to be collector, he did appoint him to be a federal property valuation commissioner. The appointment of district collector instead went to George Latimer, whom JA nominated on 28 June and the Senate confirmed the following day. Latimer (1750–1825) had been active in Pennsylvania politics for a decade, serving in the state ratifying convention and as speaker of the state assembly (Richard Thomas and others to JA, 6 June, Adams Papers; Scharf and Westcott, History of Philadelphia , 3:2087; U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour. , 5th Cong., 2d sess., p. 282, 287–288; Jefferson, Papers , 35:741).

4.

This proverb from Pliny counsels restricting oneself to one’s area of knowledge and skill ( OED ).

5.

For JA’s 27 June message to Congress on emigration from the West Indies and subsequent legislative actions, see AA to Cotton Tufts, 29 June, and note 2, below. On 25 June the Senate passed a bill 14 to 5 declaring the treaties formerly concluded between the United States and France void. The House debated the bill on 6 July, and after reducing the Senate’s preamble to the bill, passed it 47 to 37. The bill became law on 7 July ( Annals of Congress , 5th Cong., 2d sess., p. 588, 2035–2037, 2116–2128; U.S. Statutes at Large , 1:578).

6.

The Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 28 June, carried an article arguing that the prohibition of West Indian colonists from landing in the United States would be a violation of its treaty with Great Britain. It also claimed that objections to the colonists were because they were “Royalists” but that no similar complaints were made about “the landing of the republicans” from other places.