Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13

Abigail Adams to Jeremy Belknap

Abigail Adams to John Quincy Adams

108 John Quincy Adams to Abigail Adams, 11 June 1798 Adams, John Quincy Adams, Abigail
John Quincy Adams to Abigail Adams
11. June 1798.

Three more letters from you of 3. 4. and 13. April, brought to England by Mr Thornton, have just this moment come to hand, together with a pamphlet or two.—1 The message to Congress of 3. April together with all the documents accompanying it, have been published in London, from whence I have received them as mentioned in a former letter. They were received from Philadelphia by the Directory on the 28th: of last month, when neither Mr: G. nor General P. had left France— The former of these gentlemen I fear has done no honour to the trust with which he was charged— His conduct with respect to his colleagues has been very exceptionable, and his intimate associates during his residence at Paris have been men notoriously and professedly hostile to the American Government, and devoted through every extremity to the french Directory.2

It does not become me to judge what the effect of this publication might be upon the public mind in America, but it will exasperate beyond all bounds the men whose prostitution it exposes, and who have all the power of France in their hands.

They threatened, by the diplomatic skill of France, and the french party in America, to throw the blame of the rupture upon the American Government, and they are apparently now preparing to carry this threat into execution.— The Moniteur, a Paris newspaper under the influence and controul of the Government, in a pretended article from New-York dated 12. April, says, that the french party, gains strength every day, both within Congress and out of it.— The same paper has published a translation of the President’s message of 19. March— At the passage where he says that the powers of the Envoys, were extensive as a liberal and pacific policy required, they have printed the word liberal in Italics, meaning to imply that the President thereby insinuates the Envoys had powers to use bribery.—3 You have doubtless heard how the Portuguese Minister d’Araujo was treated upon a similar occasion.— The same indirect proposals for the payment of money were made to him, and as his Government was in extreme need of Peace he complied with them, and paid— They took the money, but being through all their intermediates safe from detection they were not a whit more favourable to the Minister than they had been before— He being provoked to find himself not only plundered but cheated, told of his having paid money, and they 109 instantly shut him up in the temple to teach him discretion.—4 As to the universal venality prevalent at Paris, it has long been perfectly well known, and often a subject of complaints which have however invariably been suppressed and generally severely punished— Such complaints were among the principal causes for the transportation of many persons involved in the 4th: of September proscriptions.— Stone’s letter to Dr: Priestley you will observe says, that no Man of common sense believes those people were guilty of the charges trumped up against them: their real crimes were of exposing and denouncing the innumerable infamies continually practiced by the Government.—5 I do not believe the assertion that the french party in America, was daily increasing on the 12th: of April last, but I shall be very glad to see proofs that the Spirit of Independence really prevails among my Countrymen, and that they are not more disposed to yield to the oppression of France, than they were to that of England

You will hear from London of the present condition of Ireland; the insurrection was prepared to burst forth in its utmost violence on the 22d: ulto: but the measures taken by the Government, in some measure defeated the design.— The business was unquestionably concerted with the french, and probably it was intended to combine with it an invasion from France, which did not however take place6

About 20,000 men have embarked at Toulon with Buonaparte at their head, and sailed on the 19th: of last month— One frigate stranded as they went out of the harbour, and the admiral ship itself had well nigh met the same fate.— This accident detained them untill the 22d:—When it is said they finally put to sea.7

The french Minister at this Court, Caillard, is recalled, and Sieyes comes in his stead. Otto, is to be the Secretary of the legation.—8 At present there is here an unusual stagnation of political affairs, the king being absent— He is expected to return by the last of this month.

I had some enquiries made in a Letter some time ago, about a certain German philosopher who is indeed the top of admiration in this Country, named Kant.— I gave in the winter something of a summary answer, as far as my information then extended. Mr: Pitcairn at my desire has sent a french monthly pamphlet intituled Le Spectateur du Nord, to Philadelphia— In the Number for March there is some account of the life of this Mr: Kant, and in that for April is a french translation of one of his works—a plan upon which the author thinks, an Universal History ought to be written— The french 110 translator a man remote enough from the practical frenzies of these times, appears to be fascinated into the most extravagant admiration of Kant’s theoretic madness—9 For my own part, after reading the little Treatise, I find more reason than ever to adhere to my opinion as to the objects of the philosopher—atheism and revolution.

The doctrine of the progressive improvement of mankind seems to be a favourite, and is I believe an original opinion of the modern philosophers— Price and Condorcet in their ideas of it have proved at least the weakness of the human mind in its present degree of illumination; but they have not ventured to announce the means by which this improvement is to be effected.10 This was reserved for the Prussian sage— The means are antagonism; the spirit of discord; the perpetual strife which the Creator has ordained to prevail for ever among men.— In consequence of this system the warmest admirers of Kant, consider all the horrors of the present times as glorious steps towards the greatest perfection of the species, and they seriously maintain that although the same scenes of blood and desolation should continue one two or three centuries longer, they will be amply repaid by the supreme felicity which a yet later posterity will enjoy, as the purchase of all this misery.— What such opinions will finally produce I will not undertake to say, but they promise no peaceful prospects for the present.

This periodical pamphlet the “Spectateur du Nord,” has been published untill very lately at Hamburg, but as the author has always expressed himself very freely upon french affairs, the agents of the Great Directory have interfered, with the magistrates of Hamburg, and the author was obliged to remove his publication into Holstein— I suspect a new application against him was made to the Danish Government, for his last number is dated from Lower Saxony.— The french Directors are not content with possessing, and exercising in the most arbitrary manner a controul over the press in their own Country, but they exert their power for the same purpose, in every other Country, where the fear of them extends.— I have already mentioned an instance at Hamburg; and thus in Holland, the Leyden Gazette, unquestionably the best newspaper in Europe has by their means been suppressed.— I have heretofore given an account of the persecutions which that truly learned and excellent Man, Mr: Luzac has suffered from them, and then anticipated that which has since been effected— A new Paper however is published at Leyden, in the same form as the preceding, but under a different title.11

111

I shall perhaps take some future opportunity to give you some little account of the Country where I reside, more particular than I have done hitherto— Though I have been here now more than seven months, I am far from being intimately acquainted with it— much of my leisure time has been employed in the study of the language, which I have no doubt but to acquire so far as to read it with facility; but here as in most other parts of Europe an insuperable obstacle to the attainment of a power to speak the tongue of the Country arises from the universal practice of the french in all the companies with which we associate.— In these Societies it is very rare to hear any thing else spoken by the Germans themselves— This singularity is indeed more prevalent here perhaps than any where else, from the decided preference which the great Frederic shewed through his whole life to the french language and literature, and the marked contempt which he always discovered for the German. This Prince the author of many large volumes of french prose and verse, prided himself in not knowing how to write or even spell correctly his native idiom.12 It is easy to imagine what influence the authority of such a Sovereign, and the example of such a Man combining together must have, and how long its effects would continue even against the opposite inclinations and attachments of his successors, both of whom are considered as strongly attached to their own language, and little inclined to any thing french.

Enclosed is a letter from Mrs: Adams—13 I hope her family has heard from her directly before this.— She wrote to them from Hamburg; but all our Letters from that place must have failed on the passage— I fear that several of my last Letters from London, met with the same fate, and I cannot account readily for the nonarrival of many written from this place, at so late a date as your last Letter— As all mine of any consequence are numbered, you can always tell if any are missing, and I make it an invariable practice to acknowledge the receipt of every one from my correspondence whereby you can tell whether any of your’s do not reach me.

Ever your’s

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mrs: A. Adams.”; endorsed: “J Q A / June 11th / 1798”; notation by TBA: “No 38. / 37. May 30th:.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 133.

1.

For AA’s letter of 4 April and a summary of that of the 3d, see vol. 12:480–483. For her letter of 13 April, see same, 12:498–500.

2.

In addition to his private meetings with Talleyrand, following the departure of the other commissioners, Elbridge Gerry worked closely with Joel Barlow and Fulwar Skipwith, Democratic-Republicans who acted as 112 unofficial mediators between Gerry and the French government. Both Barlow and Skipwith advised the commissioners to proceed patiently when they first arrived in France, and both attacked John Marshall and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney for their hostility to France. Skipwith believed that it was necessary for the United States to apologize for its transgressions against France, to terminate the Jay Treaty, and to agree to a loan to the French government (Stinchcombe, XYZ Affair , p. 77, 96, 109–110, 114–115).

3.

The Paris Gazette nationale ou le moniteur universel, 23 May, disputed the rumor that the French Directory had demanded $12 million; described the growth of the French party in the United States, which it declared was truly the American party; and claimed that British warmongers were disheartened. A translation of JA’s 19 March message to Congress, for which see vol. 12:455, ran in the paper on 26 May.

4.

For the negotiations and subsequent imprisonment of Portuguese minister to France Antonio de Araujo de Azevedo, see vol. 12:240–241.

5.

Copies of Original Letters Recently Written by Persons in Paris to Dr. Priestley in America, London, 1798, p. 20–21, in which John Hurford Stone wrote that while the arrests made during the French coup of 4 Sept. 1797 (An. V, 18 fructidor) were “no doubt, very distressing,” they were nevertheless necessary as “we are so placed as to be obliged to commit one evil to avoid an accumulation.”

6.

The Irish Rebellion of 1798 broke out on 24 May in several counties after weeks of violent repression and martial law. Despite having an advantage in numbers at the start of the conflict, the rebels were divided by sectarian interests, limiting their effectiveness, and the main revolts were put down in the early summer. A supportive French force commanded by Gen. Jean Joseph Amable Humbert landed in August but was quickly overwhelmed. The rebellion was quelled in the autumn after the leader of the United Irishmen, Theobald Wolfe Tone, was captured when a second, larger French invasion failed, for which see TBA to JA, 27 Oct., and note 4, below (vol. 12:199–200; Cambridge Modern Hist. , 9:701–702).

7.

This marked the beginning of Napoleon’s Egyptian campaign, for which see JQA to TBA, 12 Oct., and note 3, below. It was the portion of the British fleet led by Rear Adm. Horatio Nelson that was damaged in a storm as it approached Toulon, which allowed the French fleet to escape. Strong winds demasted the flagship Vanguard, which had to be towed to safety (The Dispatches and Letters of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Nelson, ed. Nicholas Nicolas, 7 vols., London, 1845–1846, 3:17–20).

8.

Abbé Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès served as the French minister to Prussia from 5 July 1798 until 23 May 1799, when he was named as a director. His secretary, Louis Guillaume Otto, remained in Berlin as chargé d’affaires for the remainder of the year. The German-born Otto (1754–1817) was a career French diplomat and had served both as secretary to the French legation and as chargé d’affaires in the United States during the 1780s ( Repertorium , 3:132, 144; Hoefer, Nouv. biog. générale ).

9.

JQA wrote to Joseph Pitcairn on 25 May 1798 requesting that he regularly send Le spectateur du nord, journal politique, littéraire et moral to JA (OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters). A review of Immanuel Kant’s life and work by Charles François Dominique de Villers appeared in the March edition of the journal. The following month Villers published a French translation of Kant’s 1784 essay, “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose,” which included an introduction by Villers claiming that Kant’s ideas had elevated his thinking (Le spectateur du nord, 5:335–368 [March 1798]; 6:1–39 [April 1798]; Louis Wittmer, Charles de Villers, 1765–1815, Paris, 1908, p. 27). For JA’s 25 Oct. 1797 request to TBA for information on Kant, a summary of JQA’s 3 Jan. 1798 letter on the subject, and TBA’s 4 March response to JA, see vol. 12:271, 272, 430.

10.

Richard Price, A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals, 3d edn., London, 1787, and Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, Marquis de Condorcet, Outlines of an Historical View of the Progress of the Human Mind, London, 1795.

11.

Jean Louis Amable de Baudus was the editor of Le spectateur du nord and had been expelled from Hamburg in April by Claude Roberjot, the French minister there. For the loss of Jean Luzac’s professorship at Leyden University in 1796, see vol. 11:353–354. In May 1798, based on a complaint from the French government against the Gazette de Leyde, the Batavian government shut down the newspaper. Luzac’s brother Etienne 113 Luzac, however, was willing to work within the confines of French control and was able to resume the paper as Nouvelles politiques. Jean Luzac formally removed himself as editor in August (Paris Gazette nationals ou le moniteur universel, 16 April; Jeremy D. Popkin, News and Politics in the Age of Revolution: Jean Luzac’s Gazette de Leyde, Ithaca, N.Y., 1989, p. 244–245).

12.

JQA owned several editions of Frederick II’s writings, including Oeuvres du philospophe de Sans-Souci, Neuchatel, 1760, which JQA had purchased in St. Petersburg in 1782, and Oeuvres posthumes de Frédéric II, 16 vols., Berlin, 1788, 1789, presumably purchased in Berlin (JQA, Diary , 1:110; Catalog of the Stone Library).

13.

LCA to AA, 12 June 1798, below.