Adams Family Correspondence, volume 12
d.1798
To communicate pleasure, is reflecting happiness. The secretary of
state came smiling in my Room yesterday. I said to him, I know you have got dispatches,
upon which he took from his pocket, two Letters from my dear son at Berlin. tho they
were publick Letters and upon publick buisness, they informd us of his safe arrival at
Berlin on the 7th of Nov’br, 4
days from Hamburgh— on the 10th he had an audience of the Prussian minister. the King
was informd of his arrival, and directed his Ministure to assure mr Adams, that he
received with great satisfaction this mark of attention from the united states and that
he regreetedly exceedingly that his extreem illness renderd it impossible for him to
give him the first Audience
“on the 17th mr Adams writes, The King
of Prussia died yesterday morning at 9 oclock at Potsdam. he was immediatly succeeded by
426 his son Frederic William the 3d. my Credentials cannot now be presented I must request New
ones to the Present King may be forwarded as soon as possible.”
I hope the mission began so contrary to his wishes, and so injurious to his Private interest, will become more auspicious. He had made his arrangement for going to Lisbon, hired a house there taken and paid his passage when he received news that he must go to Berlin—and this without any additional allowence, and only half the sum allowd for the outfit of a minister going from this Country, tho his expences must amount to the same—
I received he observes an office tho no promotion at once invidious in appearence and oppressive in reality, but I have done. my Country has every claim upon me. if her service were merely a Bed of Roses, it would not be a worthy incitement to ambition1
I inclose you an other paper upon the Foreign intercourse Bill. a stranger Would be ready to suppose that The President, instead of having appointed only one single Minister Since he came into office (the Envoys excepted, who was only for a particular object,) that he had Nominated an incredible Number, and increased or wanted to increase their salleries.2 the House of Rep’s have not by the constitution any right to judge of the propriety of sending foreign Ministers, nor the courts to which they shall be sent, nor the Grades. the Constitution has given that power solely to the President as it has to the House of Reps the granting of money. as well might the President assume to himself the disposal of Money, unappropriated, yet have they according to calculation expended as much Money by the length of the debate as would pay the salleries of all our ministers for two years to come—
Mr otis & mr Harper have very abley replied to mr Gallitin whose speaches I will send you as soon as they are Printed.3
Your son is well and talks of returning the beginning of the week
I would have my stockings kept till I return.
I had Letters from mrs smith4 she was well— my Love to Mrs Norten Greenleaf & their Families. Poor suky Warner. I am Grieved for her.
I am my dear sister / With unalterable / affection Your sister
RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters); addressed: “Mrs Mary Cranch / Quincy.”
See JQA to AA, 7 Oct. 1797, above.
The enclosure has not been found but was likely a copy of the
Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 3 March 1798,
which printed a 27 Feb. speech given by New York representative Jonathan Nicoll Havens
427 during the debate of the foreign intercourse
bill. Havens argued that because no limit was placed on the number of foreign
ministers the president could appoint, the House could be compelled to make
appropriations whether or not it supported the appointments. In particular, Havens
questioned the usefulness of having ministers at Berlin and The Hague (
Biog. Dir.
Cong.
).
On 1 March, during the ongoing debate over the foreign
intercourse bill, Albert Gallatin defended the constitutionality of the House’s
declining to fund the salaries of foreign ministers it deemed unnecessary. He also
warned that extending connections with Europe would entangle the United States in
foreign conflicts, inevitably leading to war and higher taxes. The following day both
Harrison Gray Otis and Robert Goodloe Harper offered responses. Otis defended the
usefulness of existing U.S. commercial treaties and justified “Executive Patronage” as
an extension of the will of the people who elected the executive. Harper argued that
Gallatin’s position was less about appropriations than it was about the power to
determine foreign appointments, which, as offices established by the law of nations
and in the case of Portugal and Prussia expressly sanctioned by Congress, the House
was bound to fund. Harper also voiced his support for a mission to Berlin and argued
that it was only through foreign ministers, not through consuls as suggested by
Gallatin, that the United States could keep itself free from political entanglements
in Europe. The Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser
printed the three speeches on 9, 10, and 12 March (Gallatin), 14 March (Otis), and 17,
20, 22, 24 March (Harper). Gallatin’s and Harper’s speeches were also published in
pamphlet form; see, for example, The Speech of Albert Gallatin
… upon the Foreign Intercourse Bill, 2d ed., Phila., 1798, Evans, No. 33777, and Mr. Harper’s Speech on the Foreign Intercourse Bill, in Reply to
Mr. Nicholas and Mr. Gallatin, [Phila., 1798], Evans, No. 33839.
Not found.
Since my residence at this place I have received your kind letter
of October 25th: written at East Chester, a few weeks
previous to your return to the seat of Government, from your nothern excursion. I have
been highly delighted by the accounts which reached us from various quarters of the
cordial & dignified reception given by the people to their chief magistrate, both in
his going from & his return to Philadelphia, and at the strain of affection which
pervades the numerous addresses, which were presented to him during his tour. They are
so many testimonies of approbation of the past & so many pledges of support to the
future administration of the Government, from the most respectable portion of the
community; and independent of the interest which I naturally took in sentiments of
respectful attachment addressed to you, I felt their full force & effect also, as
one of your fellow citizens.
Our intelligence from home is not later than the beginning of
January, when affairs are represented as having been particularly calm, though no
important discussion had then taken place in Congress. In a late letter to my mother, I
expressed an hope that this tranquility was not the consequence of a dull indifference
to the 428 actual state of our national concerns, for in my
opinion no period ever existed, which called for more wakefulness; but I cannot help
entertaining an apprehension that this is too much the case.1 Not that I distrust the spirit or temper of my
Countrymen if it were properly called forth. I believe it amply competent to ensure
success & triumph to any cause in which it shall be thoroughly exerted— But there
has been an organized employment of means to sooth the just resentment of our injured
fellow citizens, and above all to prevent any ebullition of popular indignation. The people must appear to be satisfied with the state of things,
and the Government only enraged & revengeful. I have
regretted most unfeignedly, & I still deplore as a signal calamity the necessity of
a serious contest between our Country & France, but I have long been convinced that
we ought not to decline it when forced upon us, and so perfect has been my persuasion
that no reconcilement was practicable while such dispositions existed in the french
Government, that I have for sometime considered forbearance of hostilities on our part
as impolitic & dangerous. If the progress of Jacobinism is to be arrested at all it
is by fighting it. It will not be treated with upon peaceable terms, and if there be a
nation on earth capable of going the necessary lengths and making the proper sacrifices
to stop its course, it must be one that is already possessed of substantial liberty,
that knows how to appreciate it & how to distinguish between it & that sort of
liberty which France is trying to propagate throughout the world. To every other nation
& people, the french liberty is perhaps equal if not superior to their own, at least
the difference is not worth contending for; when therefore, it is offered, accompanied
like the pistol of the highwayman with the alternative of surrender or death, who shall
dare to reject it?
Our Commissioners at Paris have been suffered to remain there
longer than I expected; but they will not succeed in their mission— they will eventually
be forced to depart, by the indignant conduct of the french
Government, and so soon as they are gone we may expect to see them accused of breaking
off the negotiation and their mission Stigmatized as
perfidious & insincere. There is precedent for this surmise, though for the
treatment of the American Envoy’s even the haughty register of the Directory does not
furnish any. They will not hear the legal Representatives of the American Government—nor
will they acknowledge them as such. It is clear then that the Government itself is
disavowed by them, and probably 429 nothing will content
them short of an exchange of the Constitution of the United States for one of the newest
fashion from the manufactory at Paris, with a loan of money into the bargain by way of
indemnity. If the people of the United States consent to this, they will be worthy of
admittance into the numerous Sisterhood of the Batavian, the Cisalpine, the Cisrhenine,
the Ligurian, the Liman & the Transjurane Republics;2 but by what pretty original name they will be baptised, I am at some loss to conjecture; though in
honor of those who first assumed the french cockade perhaps they will call it Kaskaskian.
The question, in spite of all my aversion to meet it, will force
itself upon me. Will the United States connect itself with this family? & Will the
American people desert their Government in the hour of danger, exposed to all the
consequences of the independent engagements made in their name and under the expectation
of their support? While Switzerland is fulfilling its destiny, the Cantons of Berne
Friburg, Zurich & Solathern declare their intentions of substituting democracy for
aristocracy, in order to preserve peace with France. They had previously declared their
firm resolution to maintain & adhere to their ancient Constitution at the price of
their treasures & their blood. The people revolt & their magistrates are forced
to recant. Still they take new ground and talk of an unanimous resolution of the mass of
the people to resist foreign invasion, dominion or influence, & the french Directory disclaim at the same time all views except
the abolition of the Swiss Oligarchy, having no projects whatever against their
Sovereignty & independence. It is well known that Switzerland cannot resist this
foreign invasion, which notwithstanding all declarations to the contrary is destined to
reduce this Sovereignty to the most absolute dependence upon the french Republic— Here
is precept & example too for our Countrymen—will they obey the one, or imitate the
other? I believe not, because I know they are capable of resistance, and are more
attached to their present government than the people of Switzerland are to their
aristocratic institutions. It is natural enough for an American citizen, who has
witnessed the undeviating march of all these modern Revolutions effected by foreign
interference, to figure to himself the possibility of a
similar turn to affairs in his own Country; upon no other principle can I apologize to
myself for harbouring so unworthy and degrading an opinion of my fellow citizens— They
will, I am fully persuaded, never merit or incur the application of it.
The philosophy of Professor Kant will probably spread throughout
Germany, as his works are held in high repute by those who are capable of diving into
their profound mysteries— He ranks with the Luther’s & the Calvins, but whether his
writings are destined to bring about an important reformation in the political world,
equal to that produced in religion by the labors of those to whom he is compared, time
must determine. Upon this subject, however, I can add nothing to the information already
given you by my Brother;3 but in answer
to the question whether the jealousies of the nobility and the principles of democracy
are spread in Germany, I firmly believe that it is not hazardous to affirm it. They are
thickly and universally sown & time will gather a plentiful crop of them. Mr: Burke predicts a revolution in the Empire which is to have
a more extensive & important influence upon human affairs than that of France, of
which however it can only be a consequence. France is unquestionably the head of the new
reformation, but the predictions of Burke may be oracular.4
The Congress at Rastadt now occupied upon the momentous business of a settlement for peace between the Empire & the french Republic, must eventually subscribe to all the sacrifices which France requires; and in so doing the precedent of innovation upon the integrity of the Empire will be effectually established— The bulwark of the Germanic Constitution will thereby be irrecoverably lost, and future inroads upon it will follow in the train until the Empire itself is swallowed up by the two great powers which it contains in its own bosom, though France, when bordering upon it, will not forget to put in its claim for a share of the plunder, of which it now gives the first example. These consequences seem naturally to result from the peace of Campo-Formio, where the head & chief of the Empire consented to a separation of his interests from the common cause— This abandonment secured to him an indemnity, but if my ideas upon this subject be correct, this indemnity, however ample it may seem, will eventually prove perfidious. Where is now his frontier or barrier against France? Mentz, Manheim, Philipsburg & Ehrenbreitstein are upon the Rhine & not upon the Danube.5
The small & pitiful policy, as Burke calls it, of adding towns
to their dominions seems to possess all the first rank powers of Europe.6 Poland is irrecoverably gone— Some parts of its
territory may change masters in the course of trafic, but as a separate power there is
no resurrection for it. Venice is consolidated with the mass of 431 Austria in exchange for Flanders & the Ecclesiastical States upon the left bank
of the Rhine, which are necessarily sacrificed to the natural limits insisted on by the french Republic. By way of indemnity to the
princes & States thus despoiled, they may possibly be invited to join with the
french emigrants in the enterprize of reconquering Canada.7 The prospect for the Prince of Orange is perhaps
not much more cheering than this, though his pretensions may be advocated by the
negotiator from this Court at the General Congress.
Peace both continental and maritime must take place & have some
permanency before it can be fully ascertained to what degree the Scheld is to supercede
the Texel & the Mease. A time of Commercial proscription is little favourable for
such a prediction. Antwerp appeared to me when I saw it, in deep despondency— Its
internal appearance offered the gloomy picture of a mind predisposed by sorrows,
afflictions & mortifications to assume the veil of devotion. The cross & the
image which was still left standing in some of the public squares, joined to the
occasional votaries to be met with in the act of offering their homage at its feet,
served to impress such a conception upon my mind. Its situation is highly favorable for
trade and the majestic river that runs by its borders is worthy of a comparison with our
Hudson or Delaware; but the finger of the french Republic is upon it, and though its
liquid floods do not thereby dry up, the floods of wealth & treasure which it once
bore upon its bosom have settled into other channels, but peace & a liberal policy
may possibly restore them to their kindred by nature.8 After the conquest of England, which is to
follow the Great Nation’s descent commercial law is to cease altogether & the most
unrestrained lawless liberty of the seas is to take its
place; the great monsters of the deep are to grow tame & civil by the force of such
“dulcet harmony” between all Nations of the Globe.
The late decree of the french government which is so hostile to all
neutral commerce has given considerable umbrage to the neutral powers of Europe; it has
already produced remonstrance from two of them, Denmark & Prussia, but with what
effect is not yet publicly known.9 If the
Legislature of the United States really wanted another
proof of the evil dispositions & the pernicious designs of the french Republic
towards their constituents, I should hope this last measure might convince them. Will
the House of Representatives persist in their refusal to authorise the arming of
Merchant 432 vessels, lest it should interfere with &
influence the negotiation with France? They may persist,
but not from such motives—the negotiation they talk of has never commenced— They may
continue to repeat that a lapse of six months has brought with it no alteration in the
affairs of the union, & that defence will be hostility—and if such arguments are
received in lieu of facts; if such treatment of their suffering Countrymen produce no
resentment, no indignation, I shall begin to believe that the syren song of Liberty,
equality & fraternity, has captivated all minds and prepared both governors &
governed to receive a french garrison as soon as it can be made to reach the Continent—
From that moment, come when it will, I have no longer a Country— I professedly belong to
Mr: Burke’s class of obstinates, and can never consent to a compromise with Jacobinism even should
it be disposed to pardon my heresies.10
From the little observation I have had occasion to make of the
disposition & temper of the Prussian people, I have
concluded that the subtle fluid of the french Revolution has been pretty copiously
diffused among them— The Nobility is a numerous, though an indigent & idle class—the revolutionary literature circulates among all
ranks with very little disguise— still it is not uncommon to hear them utter very
rankorous & bitter execrations against french principles, but like every body else,
they gape & stare at their astonishing progress & with a shrug of the shoulders
exclaim C’est étonant— ma foi! je ne l’aurai pas cru possible!11
I have made up my mind to leave my brother in the course of the
present year, and return home. He is now settled here in a snug family way and can
better dispense with my assistance than he could have done heretofore. As a companion
too I am now happily superceded, and though I shall leave him with great reluctance, it
will always be a consoling reflection that my continuance could add less to his comfort
than to his convenience. It is to be wished however, that my place may be supplied, and
I cannot but hope, that Mr: Malcom your present Secretary,
will be induced to come.
If in returning to America I should be so fortunate as to escape perils by sea & from privateers, I shall hope to reach it by the month of November at furthest; but I am doubtful whether the City of Philadelphia will be the most eligible place for my future residence— The almost annual occurrence of that devastating disorder, which banishes during a great part of the Summer & Autumn more than half the inhabitants, or exposes those who remain to continual alarm & danger, must be a powerful objection against that city, as 433 the permanent residence of a professional man. I shall hope to find an opening in some other quarter.12
I am dear Sir, with affectionate attachment your / Son
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “The President of the United States / Philadelphia”; internal address: “The President of the U.S.A.”; endorsed by AA: “T B Adams / 4 march 1798.”
See TBA to AA, 12 Feb., above.
The Cisrhenish or Rhineland Republic was a short-lived French
client state centered in Cologne and created in Sept. 1797 out of territory between
the Moselle and Rhine Rivers. However, because the Directory wanted the direct
annexation of the territory, it refused to recognize the fledgling republic. The
Lemanic Republic was formed out of the Pays de Vaud region of Switzerland in Jan. 1798
but was soon incorporated into the Helvetic Republic (Biro, German Policy of Revolutionary
France
, 2:838, 898–904; Lina Hug and Richard Stead, The Story of the Nations: Switzerland, N.Y., 1890, p.
349).
For JQA’s comments on Immanuel Kant, see JA to TBA, 25 Oct. 1797, note 3, above.
“A great revolution is preparing in Germany; and a revolution, in
my opinion, likely to be more decisive upon the general fate of nations than that of
France itself; other than as in France is to be found the first source of all the
principles which are in any way likely to distinguish the troubles and convulsions of
our age” (Burke, Three Memorials on French Affairs
, p. 20).
The 13th secret article of the Treaty of Campo-Formio specified
within twenty days of ratification the evacuation of several cities and fortresses
along the Rhine River, including Mainz, Mannheim, Philippsburg, and Ehrenbreitstein
(Biro, German
Policy of Revolutionary France
, 2:939).
In A Vindication of Natural Society; or,
A View of the Miseries and Evils Arising to Mankind from Every Species of Artificial
Society, London, 1756, Edmund Burke characterized the territorial struggles of
ancient Greece as “one of the bloodiest Scenes in History. One is astonished how such
a small Spot could furnish Men sufficient to sacrifice to the pitiful Ambition of
possessing five or six thousand more Acres, or two or three more Villages” (p.
20).
While no invasion was attempted, the French government did desire
to reclaim Canada and even hired spies to lay the groundwork for revolt against
British rule in Quebec (F. Murray Greenwood, Legacies of Fear:
Law and Politics in Quebec in the Era of the French Revolution, [Toronto],
1993, p. 139–140).
Antwerp had been in a state of economic decay for more than a
century after the 1648 Treaty of Münster restricted navigation of the Scheldt River,
thereby closing the city’s access to the sea. Following French military success in the
Austrian Netherlands in the fall of 1792, the National Convention reopened the river
to international commerce, and trade was slowly reestablished (vol. 5:452; JA, Papers
, 9:283; Schama, Patriots and
Liberators
, p. 405, 580).
For the French decree on neutral shipping, see
JQA to
AA, 19 Jan. 1798, and note 6, above. The neutral nations of
Europe, including Denmark and Prussia, protested France’s attack on their shipping
rights. JQA reported in several letters that while Prussia and Denmark
reinforced their armies and raised their naval forces, they also ordered their
ministers at Paris to remonstrate jointly against the French decree. By mid-March
however, France had neither answered nor shown signs of withdrawing the provision.
Denmark, following Sweden’s lead, began convoying its merchant vessels in the summer
of 1798, and the two nations coordinated their efforts under the armed neutrality
agreement of 1794 (Alexander DeConde, The Quasi-War: The
Politics and Diplomacy of the Undeclared War with France 1797–1801, N.Y., 1966,
p. 53; JQA to William Vans Murray, 13 Feb. 1798, LbC, APM Reel 130; to JA, 25 Feb.,
Adams Papers; to Timothy Pickering, 19
Feb., 8 March, LbC, APM Reel
132; H. Arnold Barton, Scandinavia in the Revolutionary Era,
1760–1815, Minneapolis, Minn., 1986, p. 248).
“If a great change is to be made in human affairs, the minds of
men will be fitted to it; the general opinions and feelings will 434 draw that way. Every fear, every hope, will
forward it; and then they who persist in opposing this mighty current in human
affairs, will appear rather to resist the decrees of Providence itself, than the mere
designs of men. They will not be resolute and firm, but perverse and obstinate” (Burke, Three Memorials
on French Affairs
, p. 80).
It is astonishing—indeed! I would not have believed it possible!
For TBA’s return to the United States in the fall of
1798, see LCA, D&A
, 1:90.