Adams Family Correspondence, volume 12
I have not written a line to you for a long time; yet scarcly an hour of the day passes in which you are not present to my mind; I fear my last Letters were captured the ship, captain scott, was taken by the French.1 you will think me more tardy than I have really been.
by the date of this you will see where I am. it was not my intention to have come here untill the Fall of the Year. I expected your Father would have been able to have returnd to me, and to have relieved himself from the weight of Buisness and care which has oppressed him; by a month or twos relaxation in the rural occupations 163 of his Farm, which are so necessary for his Health of Body and vigor of mind.
But the critical state of our Country as it respects France, the daily and increasing depredations made upon our commerce, and refusal to receive our Minister, were Subjects of so allarming a Nature, as to induce the Executive to convene Congress. This measure left me no alternative. I thought it my Duty to risk my Health, and Life in a climate which has heretofore proved injurious to the one; and hazardous to the other, for I could not permit your Father to be left Solitary, wanting my care or aid, after he had commenced Housekeeping.
on the week I was to have sit out on my journey, I was suddenly
calld to pay the last sad office of respect to the Remains of your venerable
Grandmother. she died on the 21 of April, after a short illness. her wish was fulfilld
which was to be removed before I left her: she had lived to an advanced Age having
enterd her 89th year.
But seldom comes a solitary woe. two days after her Death, I was again arrested in my journey by the death of Mary Smith. She had been in a decline for three Months. she had resided at your Uncle Cranchs for several years, and was a fine girl, with a very improved mind. her death at the Age of 21, was severely felt by us all. patient resignd and Submissive, she evinced to all the justice of the poets sentiment That,
These melancholy harbingers following, so closely each other, cast a Gloom over every object, and saddend the otherways Cheerfull Scenes of Nature, which were just waking into Life, and putting on new verdure after a long and severe winter.
I cannot Name to you the date of your last Letter to me, having
undesignedly left it at Quincy. I know the Month was March.3 I find here a double pleasure and advantage
having the priviledge of reading all your Letters. Your
last publick Letter was March 27th
4 those which I have seen to your Father since I
came here, were dated Feb’ry 3d
7th & 16th March 4th and 18th.5 the originals and duplicats have all safely
arrived, tho not always in the order of Time, but they never come too late to
communicate authentick information, and have not been a little instrumental in disolving
the facination which had bewilderd too many of the well disposed of our Countrymen.6
There are so many occurences of a publick nature which daily arise that I cannot undertake to detail them to you. that which more particularly affects you is the Change of your mission from the Court of Lisbon to Berlin. the reason which opperated in affecting this Change will be obvious to you, that of being more usefull to your Country at the present time, than you could be in Lisbon. it was necessary that the Nomination should take place early in the session, that you might be prevented an unnecessary voyage. the senate concured in the appointment, 19 to 9: those who were opposed, said it was not to the person, but to the Mission; it was contended that the constitution gave them no Right to judge of that, that the power lay wholy with the Executive. The Jacobins endeavourd to make use of it, as tho it was an advancement from the Residentship at the Hague, to a Plenipotentiaryship and being the first nomination, was held up by communications in Baches papers, as a proof of the asspiring views of the President, but this could only impose on a few. the subject was clearly stated, but Envy is always Malignant. the Faction are not Idle, but their views are perfectly understood.
The next nomination was of Envoys Extraordinary to France. Judge
Dana, and Genll Marshal of Virginna are joind with mr
Pinckny. these Gentlemen were also opposed by Some in senate, tho a very small Number, 4
against 22–2 were absent. the reason given was that they were voilently opposed to the
French; they would not have been chosen by the Executive if that had been the case. they
are true Americans, and as such, will be desirious of setling all differences amicably
upon just and equitable Terms, which is the sincere desire of every real Friend of both
Countries. War we deprecate with any power, and Peace will be cultivated by every means
consistant with our National honour and independence.
I presume you may have seen a Letter which has been the subject of much conversation here, and was publishd just before the meeting of congress. The writer may say with the poet,
Mazzei committed a breach upon a private correspondence when he publishd it. from the stile of it, and the sentiments it contains, I presume it was Written, about the period when the writer was anxious to convert all political Heriticks to French Faith.— I believe it 165 has been republishd in every News paper throughout the united states and is thought, to be genuine, as the writer has never denied it, tho publickly calld upon to do it; You may be sure it has not escaped censure, and will never be forgotten by the Characters traduced.8 my paper remind me that it will not contain more / than the affectionate Regard of your / Mother
RC (Adams
Papers); endorsed by TBA: “Mrs: A
Adams 15 June 1797. / 22d July Recd / 29 Do Answd.”
Tr (Adams Papers).
The brig John, Capt. James Scott
Jr., which left Boston on 23 Jan. en route to London, was captured by the privateer
L’Amitié on 27 Feb. and carried to Roscoff, France. On
4 April a French tribunal of commerce condemned the John
for lacking “a rôle d’équipage in good form.” After several appeals the vessel and its
cargo were condemned a second time on 3 June 1799 by a French civil tribunal on the
grounds that there were irregularities with the passport, bills of lading, and rôle d’équipage (Williams, French Assault on American Shipping
,
p. 203–204; U.S. House, Documents
, 59th Cong., 1st sess., No. 807, p.
1–2).
Edward Young, The Complaint; or, Night
Thoughts, Night II, lines 649–650.
The most recent extant letter from JQA to AA is dated 8 Feb. 1797, for which see vol. 11:546–550.
In his 27 March letter to Timothy Pickering, JQA described the French Directory’s latest navigation decree and reported rumors that France intended that the U.S. government pay French debts to American citizens for previous shipping seizures and that a secret treaty between France and Prussia had been signed (LbC, APM Reel 129).
In his letter to JA of 4 March, JQA reported rumors of JA’s election in Europe. He commented on various French attempts to influence U.S. politics and the complicity of Democratic-Republicans in those attempts. JQA also briefly described European affairs, including the recent successes of the French Army and the civil unrest across the Batavian Republic (Adams Papers). For summaries of JQA to JA, 3, 7, and 16 Feb. (all Adams Papers), see vol. 11:550; for a summary of JQA to JA, 18 March, see AA to Thomas Welsh, 6 June, and note 4, above.
JQA’s 3 Feb. letter to JA was reprinted
in the New York Minerva, 25 May, and the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 29 May.
Alexander Pope, “Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot,” lines 125–126.
On 24 April 1796 Thomas Jefferson wrote to his former neighbor
Philip Mazzei, then living in Pisa, Italy. Written at the height of the Jay Treaty
debate, the letter revealed Jefferson’s thoughts on the current state of American
politics: “In place of that noble love of liberty and republican government which
carried us triumphantly thro’ the war, an Anglican, monarchical and aristocratical
party has sprung up,” among which Jefferson included the president, the courts,
two-thirds of the legislature, and “all timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to
the boisterous sea of liberty.” On receipt of the letter Mazzei sent copies to several
friends, one of which was published in the Paris Gazette
nationale ou le moniteur universel, 25 Jan. 1797. An excerpt first appeared in
the United States in the New York Minerva, 2 May (Jefferson, Papers
, 29:73–88). For JQA’s views on the letter, see
JQA to
AA, 29 July, below. For more on Mazzei, see JA, Papers
,
9:483 and 17:xvi–xvii.