Adams Family Correspondence, volume 11

Charles Adams to John Adams

Abigail Adams Smith to John Quincy Adams

41 Abigail Adams to John Quincy Adams, 8 October 1795 Adams, Abigail Adams, John Quincy
Abigail Adams to John Quincy Adams
my Dear son Quincy october 8th 1795

I hear of a vessel going to Amsterdam, and tho I presume you are not in Holland, I shall write a few lines just to let you know that we are all well, and that your Letters by capt Trevett, who saild from Roterdam arrived safe and the Books, but the Bracelets you mention intending to send by it, I have not any tydings of.1 it would have been fortunate if you had given them to the Captain, as well as the Books. I regreet that my other matters were not put on Board. it is of very little concequence what port a vessel is Bound to, provided it is in the state. I would add to my former commission, and request that 2 Doz table cloths may be sent in stead of one, only that they should be a size larger.

Mr Dickinson and Family have arrived from London.2 I have not seen them yet, but I hear they bring allarming accounts of a scarcity of Bread in England

Before this reaches you, you will hear no Doubt of the Party opposition to the Treaty, and of Sercet Service Money circulating in America. that there are hireling Writers and printers, orators and Declamers, I have not the least Doubt. Bache paper and the noted Chronical have become the infamous vehicles of the most insolent & perfidious Defamation, Rancorous Knaves & Desperate incendiarys Skulk behind the press, and stab the fairest and best characters in the United States. Witness the present Writers, under the signature of Bellisarius, Vallerius Hancock & Cato, the three first Written at Philadelphia, the last at Nyork—in which the President and mr Jay, are treated like the Vilest Tyrants and greatest Trators of the Age.3 I doubt not many of these papers will reach you, but I cannot have a Hand, in transmitting such base calumny. You know what an Engine the press has been in France, in sewing the seads of sedition and, aiding all their Sanguinary Machinations. God forbid that Americans should become imitators of their examples—

every effort is made use of to Draw and to Drive the United states into a War, but if the Government of Great Britain is no seazd with the folly and Madness of individuals, the Party spirit will subside in America, when it is found that their toil is useless, and the great Bulk of America, the Yeomonary, and all the solid judicious Characters are against War, and willing to acquiese in the Treaty. I inclose 42 you part of a News paper in which you will see the late appointments, and a Letter which will cause you some speculation.4 all I can say is, our judgments must be suspended untill Congress come together—

N York is in a Distresst state. the Yellow fever has made great Havock. the consternation and distress is little less than that which took place at Philadelphia Happily your sister and Family have been out of Town ever since I left her in july.

My Love to Thomas. I wrote him two Letters under cover to you about a fortnight since I shall write again soon by a conveyance to England5

Yours most affectionatly

Abigail Adams

Louissa desires to be rememberd

RC (Adams Papers); endorsed by TBA: “Mrs: A Adams to JQA / 8th: Octr: 1795 / 12 Novr: Recd:”; and by JQA: “21. Decr: recd. London. / 6. Jany: 1796. Answered.”

1.

For JQA’s letter to AA of 29 June, carried by Capt. Samuel Russell Trevett, see vol. 10:468–470. JQA might have also sent his letter of 15 June to AA by the same route; see vol. 10:452–454. Neither letter mentions the books that were apparently enclosed. AA sent her letter by the Ann, Capt. Robert Lord; see TBA to AA, 1 Dec., and note 1, below.

2.

Thomas Dickason Jr. and his family arrived in Boston from London aboard the America on 3 October. Dickason, a merchant, subsequently purchased a house at the corner of Milk and Oliver Streets in Boston (Boston Courier, 3 Oct.; Thwing Catalogue, MHi).

3.

Belisarius was published in five pieces in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 11, 15, 22 Sept., 3, 14 October. The elevenpart essay by Valerius appeared in the Aurora, 22 Aug., 1, 9, 17, 25 Sept., 8, 21, 29 Oct., 11, 19 Nov., 1 December. Hancock wrote five pieces for the Aurora, 21, 27 Aug., 3, 8, 12, September. The essays by Cato, sixteen in all, appeared in the New York Argus, 15, 17, 22, 25, 31 July, 7, 11, 17, 22, 26, 29 Aug., 2, 10, 16, 23, 30 September. All four series argue against the Jay Treaty. For instance, after a lengthy article-by-article dissertation on what he perceives to be the failings of the treaty, Cato notes in his concluding piece, “The treaty has obtained no adequate compensation for the injuries we have suffered; that it has relinquished important claims that we had upon the British government. … That it is injurious to our commerce, and ruinous to our navigation. … That it counteracts the existing laws, and violates the federal constitution, and that it infringes the rights of individual States” (30 Sept.). Similarly Hancock compares the treaty to a volcano, which “contains within its bosom the materials of destruction” (21 Aug.). But these pieces also particularly criticize George Washington and John Jay, offering direct personal attacks, as well as chastising them for their roles in negotiating and implementing the treaty. Valerius, for example, describes Washington as a man who in youth was “unadorned by extraordinary features or uncommon capacity,” with “none of those sparks of genius, however irregular and inconstant, which mark the dawn of future eminence” (21 Oct.), and Jay as someone who had displayed “sentiments of hostility to liberty” and “incompetency” (19 Nov.).

4.

The enclosure has not been found but was likely the Boston Columbian Centinel, 16 September. This issue contained speculation on new cabinet appointments, for which see AA to JQA, [ca. 28 Sept.], and note 5, above. It also contained a copy of George Washington’s 5 Sept. letter revoking Thomas William Moore’s exequatur, for which see AA to TBA, 17 Sept., and note 3, above.

5.

One of these letters was of 17 Sept., above. The second, apparently of 18 Sept., for which see TBA to JQA, 23 Dec., and note 8, below, has not been found.