Adams Family Correspondence, volume 9

17 Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch, 20 February 1790 Adams, Abigail Cranch, Mary Smith
Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch
My dear sister Richmond Hill Febry 20 1790

I yesterday received a Letter from dr Tufts and an other from Thomas informing me of the death of Mrs Palmer.1 the good old Lady is gone to rest, happily for her I doubt not, but what will become of her daughters Heaven only knows, Polly in particular. I feel very unhappy for them, and you I am sure must be still more so. I suppose you was too heavily loaded with care, and affliction to write me by the last post. they may continue in the House untill we want it, if it would any way serve them, but I presume there cannot be any thing for their support after their Mothers discease. I am sure you cannot help looking back for 20 years and exclaming what a change! but such are the visisitudes of Life, and the Transitory fleeting state of all sublinary things; of all pride that which persons discover from Riches is the weakest. if we look over our acquaintance, how many do we find who were a few years ago in affluence, now reduced to real want but there is no Family amongst them all whose schemes have proved so visionary, and so abortive as the unhappy one we are now commisirating. better is a little with contentment than great Treasure; and trouble therewith. it would be some consolation to the Sisters if they had a Brother in whom they could take comfort. if ever convents are usefull, would be for persons thus circumstanced.2

I did not write to you by Thomas as I thought he could give you every information you wish'd for respecting us. he writes that he got home well, but appears in Some anxiety about the Measles. I would not wish him to avoid them, but only to be watchfull when he takes them and to be particularly attentive to himself during the period. this care I know you will have of him, if he should get them, and if he does not take them, he will always have an anxiety upon his mind increasing too as he advances in Life, every time he is liable to be exposed to them.

From all the Debates in Congress upon the subject of a discrimination, I presume the vote will be that there shall be none, but that some one or other of the plans proposed by the Secretary of the Treasury will be adopted it is thought that tomorrow will be the desisive day with respect to the question, as the vote will be calld for.3 on this occasion I am going for the first Time to the House with mrs dalton4 mrs Jay & Mrs Cushing to hear the debate. if you read the 18papers you will find Some very judicious debates.5 mr Smith of S C who married a daughter of mr Izard, is one of the first from that state, & I might add from the Southern states.6 mr Ames from our state & mr Sedwick and mr Gerry are all right upon this Question & make a conspicuous figure in the debates.7 I hope some method will be adopted Speedily for the relief of those who have so long been the sufferers by the instability of Government. the next question I presume that will occupy Congress will be the Assumpition of the state debts and here I apprehend warm work, and much opposition, but I firmly believe it will terminate for the General Good.

What a disgrace upon the Legislature of our state that they should permit Such a Madman as Gardner to occupy their time, to vilify Characters to propogate grose falshoods to the world under their Sanction. I should feel more trust for them if I did not foresee that good would come out of it in time. if the Bar possess that Honour which I presume they Have, they will combine to defeat Gardner and his Abetters and establish such Rules & Regulations as will tend to restore their profession to the same Reputation which they held before the Revolution. you and I feel peculiarly interested in this matter as we have children rising into Life educated to the Law, without a competant knowledge of which no Man is fit for a Legislator or a statesman. let us look into our National Legislature, Scarcly a man there makes any figure in debate, who has not been Bred to the Law

pray give my Love to my worthy Brother Cranch & tell him that I sympathize with him in his affliction Remember me affectionatly to my Neices & Nephew and believe / that your happiness is very near the Heart / of your ever affectionat

A Adams

RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters); addressed by CA: “Mrs Mary Cranch / Braintree.”

1.

The letter from TBA has not been found.

2.

Gen. Joseph Palmer suffered a financial reversal after the Revolution that culminated in the loss of the family's Germantown estate. Palmer invested his few remaining assets building saltworks on the Boston Neck but died in 1788 before they were fully operational, leaving the family destitute. Mary Cranch Palmer and her two daughters had moved into the Old House in the Adamses’ absence the previous fall ( Grandmother Tyler's Book , p. 83–95; vol. 8:385).

3.

Part of the ongoing debate in the House of Representatives regarding Alexander Hamilton's report on the public credit, James Madison's discrimination amendment would have made a distinction, when debt certificates were repaid, between the original holders of government securities and the people who subsequently purchased them at a depreciated cost, dividing compensation between the two. The proposal was soundly rejected on 22 Feb. 1790 ( First Fed. Cong. , 12:283, 473).

4.

Ruth Hooper Dalton (1739–1826), daughter of Robert and Ruth Hooper of Marblehead, was the wife of Massachusetts 19senator Tristram Dalton (Vital Records of Marblehead, Salem, 1903, p. 275; Salem Gazette, 17 Jan. 1826; Sibley's Harvard Graduates , 13:569).

5.

Coverage of debates in the House of Representatives on Madison's motion appeared in the New York Daily Gazette, 16–20 Feb., and New York Gazette of the United States, 17, 20 Feb. ( First Fed. Cong. , 12:322–345, 355–369).

6.

William Loughton Smith (ca. 1758–1812), married to Charlotte Izard (d. 1792), was a South Carolina lawyer and staunch Federalist who served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1789 until 1797, when he became minister to Portugal ( DAB ).

7.

Congressmen Fisher Ames, Elbridge Gerry, and Theodore Sedgwick all spoke at length in opposition to Madison's plan. Sedgwick argued, “What merit would the government possess, if it stripped one class of citizens who had acquired by the known and established rules of law, property, of that property, under the specious pretence of doing justice to another class of citizens” ( First Fed. Cong. , 12:335–345, 451–459).

Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch, 28 February 1790 Adams, Abigail Cranch, Mary Smith
Abigail Adams to Mary Smith Cranch
my dear sister Newyork Feb’ry 28 1790

on the 17 of this Month cousin William wrote his uncle,1 that he had carried his cousin Tom Home to Braintree with the Symptoms of the Measles upon him; you will easily Suppose that I waited for the next post with great anxiety but how was I dissapointed last Evening when mr Adams returnd from Town, and the Roads being very bad the post had not arrived. I could not content myself without sending into Town again before I went to Bed, but the Servant returnd with two Newspapers only. I am the more anxious because I know that Thomas was not well during the whole time that [he] was with us. I gave him a puke, after which he appeard [bet]ter. he appeard to me to have lost his appetite his flesh and his coulour, & I am fearfull he was in a poor state to take the measles. I know that he will have every care & attention under your Roof that he could have, if I was with him and this is a great relief to my mind; but to hear that he was sick, and to be ten days in suspence, & how much longer I know not; has made me very unhappy. if you have occasion for wine as no doubt you will, pray send for the Key and get it; and let Pratt bring you wood.— The trouble you must necessarily be in upon the death of Mrs Palmer, and the distrest Situation of the Family, anxiety which I know you feel for Mrs Norten, and now the Sickness of Thomas I fear will prove too much for your Health. I wrote to you by the last post and to Thomas, but tis a long time since I had a Letter from you.2 I think the House had better be shut up than permitt any Body that I can think of, to go into it especially as I think it probable we shall spend a large part of the year there. I wish however that the dr might be consul[ted] with regard to the Safety of the House; pray write to me and relieve my mind as soon as possible.

20

I have never heard how Brother got home with his charge. is Polly married? I did not mention it to him while he was here, but mr A did. I knew it to be so much against his inclination that I thought it best to be silent.3 our Family are all well. mrs Cushing and mrs Rogers Spent the day with me yesterday. the judg and his Lady appear very happy, and well pleasd with their situation & reception at Newyork. I am very well pleasd to find that Gardner is returning to his former insignifica[nce] Strange that he should be attended to, or have any weight with sensible Men—

my Love to cousin Lucy whom with the rest of my Friends I long to see. Believe me dear sister most / affectionatly yours

A Adams

RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters); addressed by CA: “Mrs Mary Cranch / Braintree.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.

1.

Not found.

2.

The letter to TBA has not been found.

3.

For Mary (Polly) Adams’ marriage, see Cranch to AA, 28 Feb., and note 4, below.